INTEGRATED PROTECTED AREA CO-MANAGEMENT (IPAC) - BIDS
INTEGRATED PROTECTED AREA CO-MANAGEMENT (IPAC) - BIDS
INTEGRATED PROTECTED AREA CO-MANAGEMENT (IPAC) - BIDS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The basic structure of marketing chains for SRF products is shown in Figure 1.1. However, the<br />
actual marketing chains are found to follow multi-dimensional patterns (Annex C).<br />
As mentioned earlier, the theme of the present study is to map the monetary value throughout<br />
the chain. In other words, our ultimate output would look like something involving the following<br />
steps (Figure 1.2):<br />
Figure 1.2: A simplified and typical SRF marketing system and value chain of the actors (% of<br />
retail price)<br />
Collector Faria/Bepari Choto<br />
Boro<br />
Aratdar Wholesaler<br />
Mahajan Mahajan<br />
Retailer<br />
VA = ?<br />
C = ?<br />
M = ?<br />
VA = ?<br />
C = ?<br />
M = ?<br />
VA = ?<br />
C = ?<br />
M = ?<br />
VA = ?<br />
C = ?<br />
M = ?<br />
VA = ?<br />
C = ?<br />
M = ?<br />
VA = ?<br />
C = ?<br />
M = ?<br />
VA = ?<br />
C = ?<br />
M = ?<br />
VA = Value addition; C = costs; M = Margin = VA – C<br />
1.4.6 Characteristics of SRF Actors and Plausible Hypotheses regarding the<br />
Value Chain<br />
The study aims to track the various channels of SRF product marketing and the agents<br />
involved. As will be evident later, the marketing and distribution system of major SRF<br />
products follow a complex system in a unique economic zone. For many of the items, which<br />
are dependent to some extent on FD rules and regulations, the number and type of major<br />
intermediaries (e.g., Mahajans and Aratdars) are rather limited, allowing for oligopolistic<br />
behavior to carry out such activities. The complex pattern of markets of SRF items in<br />
Bangladesh makes the market operation interesting and critical. In this backdrop, concerns with<br />
regard to resource control of the leading powerful agents, musclemen and intermediaries are<br />
strongly voiced from time to time, however, often without adequate proof. The market power (in<br />
terms of share of particular player in total supply) is also reported to be concentrated in the<br />
hands of a few powerful players (See, for example, Rahman 2007). On the other hand, the<br />
bargaining power of disadvantaged group (e.g., harvesters) is critically low for various factors.<br />
This may give rise to the possibility of inequity and anti-competitive behavior (for example,<br />
price manipulation, ownership of productive resources and control of supply in the market,<br />
earning extraordinary profit) through a well-coordinated oligopolistic behavior. The present<br />
study is an attempt to examine the relevant issues in this context.<br />
Within a complex system, it is hypothesized that the number of important and powerful<br />
players in the marketing and distribution system of SRF goods is limited who can exert the<br />
major control over the productive resources allowing for oligopolistic behavior to carry out<br />
such activities 39 . In other words, it is hypothesized that such network of powerful actors<br />
creates unequal income distribution among SIZ populations through widespread exploitations.<br />
1.4.7 Methodological Issues relating to Estimation Procedures<br />
39 See Rahman (2007) for a similar hypothesis.<br />
15