31.07.2014 Views

INTEGRATED PROTECTED AREA CO-MANAGEMENT (IPAC) - BIDS

INTEGRATED PROTECTED AREA CO-MANAGEMENT (IPAC) - BIDS

INTEGRATED PROTECTED AREA CO-MANAGEMENT (IPAC) - BIDS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The basic structure of marketing chains for SRF products is shown in Figure 1.1. However, the<br />

actual marketing chains are found to follow multi-dimensional patterns (Annex C).<br />

As mentioned earlier, the theme of the present study is to map the monetary value throughout<br />

the chain. In other words, our ultimate output would look like something involving the following<br />

steps (Figure 1.2):<br />

Figure 1.2: A simplified and typical SRF marketing system and value chain of the actors (% of<br />

retail price)<br />

Collector Faria/Bepari Choto<br />

Boro<br />

Aratdar Wholesaler<br />

Mahajan Mahajan<br />

Retailer<br />

VA = ?<br />

C = ?<br />

M = ?<br />

VA = ?<br />

C = ?<br />

M = ?<br />

VA = ?<br />

C = ?<br />

M = ?<br />

VA = ?<br />

C = ?<br />

M = ?<br />

VA = ?<br />

C = ?<br />

M = ?<br />

VA = ?<br />

C = ?<br />

M = ?<br />

VA = ?<br />

C = ?<br />

M = ?<br />

VA = Value addition; C = costs; M = Margin = VA – C<br />

1.4.6 Characteristics of SRF Actors and Plausible Hypotheses regarding the<br />

Value Chain<br />

The study aims to track the various channels of SRF product marketing and the agents<br />

involved. As will be evident later, the marketing and distribution system of major SRF<br />

products follow a complex system in a unique economic zone. For many of the items, which<br />

are dependent to some extent on FD rules and regulations, the number and type of major<br />

intermediaries (e.g., Mahajans and Aratdars) are rather limited, allowing for oligopolistic<br />

behavior to carry out such activities. The complex pattern of markets of SRF items in<br />

Bangladesh makes the market operation interesting and critical. In this backdrop, concerns with<br />

regard to resource control of the leading powerful agents, musclemen and intermediaries are<br />

strongly voiced from time to time, however, often without adequate proof. The market power (in<br />

terms of share of particular player in total supply) is also reported to be concentrated in the<br />

hands of a few powerful players (See, for example, Rahman 2007). On the other hand, the<br />

bargaining power of disadvantaged group (e.g., harvesters) is critically low for various factors.<br />

This may give rise to the possibility of inequity and anti-competitive behavior (for example,<br />

price manipulation, ownership of productive resources and control of supply in the market,<br />

earning extraordinary profit) through a well-coordinated oligopolistic behavior. The present<br />

study is an attempt to examine the relevant issues in this context.<br />

Within a complex system, it is hypothesized that the number of important and powerful<br />

players in the marketing and distribution system of SRF goods is limited who can exert the<br />

major control over the productive resources allowing for oligopolistic behavior to carry out<br />

such activities 39 . In other words, it is hypothesized that such network of powerful actors<br />

creates unequal income distribution among SIZ populations through widespread exploitations.<br />

1.4.7 Methodological Issues relating to Estimation Procedures<br />

39 See Rahman (2007) for a similar hypothesis.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!