influence du climat et de la prÃ©dation sur l'utilisation de l'habitat et la ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Douglas, C. L. , & D. M. Leslie, Jr. 1986. Influence ofweather and density oflamb survival of desert mountain sheep. Journal of Wildlife Management 50: 153- 156. Dussault, c., 1. P. Ouellet, R. Courtois, J. Huot, L. Breton, & J. Larochelle. 2004. Behavioural responses of moose to thermal conditions in the boreal forest. Ecoscience 11 :321-328. Dzialowski, E. M. 2005. Use of operative temperature and standard operative temperature models in thermal biology. Journal of Thermal Biology 30:317- 334. Earle, R. D. , & K. R . Kramm. 1982. Correlation between fisher and porcupine abundance in upper Michigan. American Midland Naturalist 107:244-249. Ebensperger, L. A., & M. 1. Hurtado. 2005. On the relationship between herbaceous coyer and vigilance activity ofdegus (Octodon degus). Ethology 111 :593-608 . Eberhardt, L. L. 2002. A paradigm for population analysis of long-lived vertebrates. Ecology 83:2841-2854. Fairbanks, W. S. 1993. Birth-date, birth-weight, and survival in pronghorn fawns. Journal ofMammalogy 74 :129-135 . Farn1er, C. J., D. K. Person, & R. T. Bowyer. 2006. Risk factors and mortality of black-tailed deer in a managed forest landscape. Journal of Wildlife Management 70: 1403 -1415 . Farnsworth, E. J., & 1. Rosovsky. 1993. The ethics of ecological field experimentation. Conservation Biology 7:463-472. Fisher, D. O ., & A. W . Goldizen. 2001. Maternai care and infant behaviour of the bridled nailtail wallaby (Onychogaleafraenata). Journal ofZoology 255:321- 330. Fitzgibbon, C. D . 1993. Antipredator strategies offemale Thomson gazelles with hidden fawns. Journal ofMammalogy 74:758-762 . Forchhammer, M. c., T. H. Clutton-Brock, 1. Lindstrom, & S. D . Albon. 2001. Climate and population density induce long-term cohort variation in a northern ungulate. Journal of Animal Ecology 70:721-729. Forchhammer, M. c., N . C. Stenseth, E. Post, & R. Langvatn. 1998. Population dynamics ofNorwegian red deer: density-dependence and climatic variation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-B iological Sciences 265:341-350. Forman, D. W., & K. Williamson. 2005. From the field: an alternative method for handling and marking small carnivores without the need for sedation. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33:313-316. Fortin, D. 2001. The use ofheated taxidermie mounts in studies ofecological energetics. Mammalia 65: 195-204. Fortin, D., H. L. Beyer, M. S. Boyce, D. W. Smith, T. Duchesne, & J. S. Mao. 2005. Wolves influence elk movements: behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 86: 1320-1330. 126
127 Fortin, D., & G. Gauthier. 2000. The effect of postural adjustment on the thermal environment of greater snow goose goslings. Canadian Journal ofZoology 78:8 17-821. Fournier, F., & D. W. Thomas. 1999. Thermoregulation and repeatability ofoxygenconsumption measurements in winter-acclimatized North American porcupines (Erethizon dorsatum). Canadian Journal ofZoology 77: 194-202. Frohlich, C. 2000. Observations of irradiance variations. Space Science Reviews 94: 15-24. Gaillard, 1. M., M. Festa-Bianchet, & N. G. Yoccoz. 1998. Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13:58-63. Gaillard, 1. M., M. Festa-Bianchet, N. G. Yoccoz, A. Loison, & C. Toiego. 2000. Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31 :367-393. Gaillard, 1. M., A. Loison, & C. Toiego. 2003. Variation in life history traits and realistic population models for wildlife management: the case of ungulates. Pages 115-132 in M . Festa-Bianchet & M . Apollonio, editors. Animal behavior and wildlife conservation. Island Press, Washington, USA. Gaillard, J. M., D . Pontier, D. Allaine, 1. D. Lebreton, 1. Trouvilliez, & 1. Clobert. 1989. An analysis of demographic tactics in birds and mammals. Di/ms 56:59- 76. Gaillard, 1. M., & N. G. Yoccoz. 2003. Temporal variation in survival ofmammals: A case of environmental canalization? Ecology 84 :3294-3306. Gaillard,1. M., N. G. Yoccoz, 1. D. Lebreton, C. Bonenfant, S. Devillard, A. Loison, D. Pontier, & D . Allaine. 2005. Generation time: a reliable metric to measure life-history variation among mammalian populations. American Naturalist 166: 119-123. Gaines, M. S., & L. R. McClenaghan. 1980. Dispersal in small mammals. Annual Review ofEcology and Systematics 11: 163-196. Garshelis, D. L. 2000. Delusions in habitat evaluation: measuring use, selection, and importance. Pages 111-164 in L. Boitani & T. K. Fuller, editors. Research techniques in animal ecology- Controversies and consequences. Columbia University Press, New York, USA. Gauthier, G., R. Pradel, S. Menu, & 1. D. Lebreton. 2001. Seasonal survival of greater snow geese and effect of hunting under dependence in sighting probability. Ecology 82:3 105-3119. Gese, E. M., R. L. Ruff, & R. L. Crabtree. 1996a. Foraging ecology of coyotes (Canis latrans): the influence of extrinsic factors and a dominance hierarchy. Canadian Journal ofZoology 74:769-783. Gese, E. M., R. L. Ruff, & R. L. Crabtree. 1996b. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing coyote predation of small mammals in Yellowstone National Park. CanadianJournal ofZoology 74:784-797 .
Page 1 and 2:
UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À RIMOUSKI
Page 3 and 4:
Remerciements Cette thèse n'aurait
Page 5 and 6:
Table des matières LISTE DES TABLE
Page 7 and 8:
Liste des tableaux Chapitre 3 Table
Page 9 and 10:
VB Table 4.2 Power consumed (in Wat
Page 11 and 12:
Liste des figures Chapitre 1 Figure
Page 13 and 14:
XI Figure 2.3 Number oftimes ajuven
Page 15 and 16:
Xlll Figure 4.3 Time spent outside
Page 17 and 18:
Liste des annexes Annexe 1 Descript
Page 19 and 20:
Chapitre 1 Introduction 1.1 Impact
Page 21 and 22:
3 L ' importance relative des facte
Page 23 and 24:
5 des populations ne donne qu' une
Page 25 and 26:
7 (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) les
Page 27 and 28:
9 1940 1000 1960 139---------- c ~
Page 29 and 30:
1 1 (Roze 1987). Ils perdent 10 à
Page 31 and 32:
13 140 a) 1 20 - o -l- 2000 2001 20
Page 33 and 34:
15 manipulations et la pose d'émet
Page 35 and 36:
Chapitre 2 Handling North American
Page 37 and 38:
19 information is lacking in the pu
Page 39 and 40:
21 We searched for juvenile porcupi
Page 41 and 42:
23 Switzerland). To check sex and r
Page 43 and 44:
25 transmitters fo r larger units s
Page 45 and 46:
27 8 a) 7 "0 c: :l 0 6 -If) ~ c: 5
Page 47 and 48:
29 record sex, reproducti ve status
Page 49 and 50:
Chapitre 3 Predation as a possible
Page 51 and 52:
33 3.2. Introduction A growing numb
Page 53 and 54:
35 predation risk. To do so, we tes
Page 55 and 56:
37 Table 3.1 : Monitoring effort ac
Page 57 and 58:
39 winter precipitation (total prec
Page 59 and 60:
41 emaciated), road kills, dead fro
Page 61 and 62:
43 Seasonal survival rates The sele
Page 63 and 64:
45 >. 1.0 0.9 ..... 0.8 .c ta .c 0.
Page 65 and 66:
47 Causes of mortality We assigned
Page 67 and 68:
49 100 - 90 a) 80 1/) c: .2 iii ...
Page 69 and 70:
51 too simplistic to detect complex
Page 71 and 72:
53 correlated with winter survival
Page 73 and 74:
55 4.1. A bstract Because the clima
Page 75 and 76:
57 Ta, first because of the effects
Page 77 and 78:
59 Third, we evaluated the behaviou
Page 79 and 80:
61 pattern of den use over one or t
Page 81 and 82:
63 two modali ties, Table 4.1, mode
Page 83 and 84:
65 feeding behaviour for the popula
Page 85 and 86:
67 of Tc we considered. However, we
Page 87 and 88:
69 Calculating TefrOIn Ta, wind spe
Page 89 and 90:
71 Number and duration of activity
Page 91 and 92:
73 8 o _ --L-_ 0 Operative temperat
Page 93 and 94: 75 Beschta 2004). Predation rates w
Page 95 and 96: 77 in our population (chap. 3). Mal
Page 97 and 98: 79 Tableau 4.5 : Pourcentage d'obse
Page 99 and 100: 81 associées avec le temps de surv
Page 101 and 102: 83 5.1. Abstract ln many mammals, j
Page 103 and 104: 85 use of coyer influenced summer s
Page 105 and 106: 87 juvenile was moving to escape fr
Page 107 and 108: 89 individual (using approximations
Page 109 and 110: 91 den use (treated as a binary var
Page 111 and 112: 1 93 20 - 18 ~ a) DAvailable .Used
Page 113 and 114: 95 80 -, 70 l DAvailable .Used 60 -
Page 115 and 116: 97 Table 5.3: Use of coyer by juven
Page 117 and 118: 99 juveniles. At the microhabitat s
Page 119 and 120: 101 However, we think protection fr
Page 121 and 122: 103 we found that most mortalities
Page 123 and 124: Chapitre 6 Conclusion Dans le cadre
Page 125 and 126: 107 porcs-épics fréquentent les c
Page 127 and 128: 109 épies, via un impact des condi
Page 129 and 130: II I Hiver E n hi ver, on montre qu
Page 131 and 132: 113 compromis auquel les animaux fo
Page 133 and 134: 11 5 En été, la mortalité des je
Page 135 and 136: 117 pékan dans la région. On mont
Page 137 and 138: 119 Annexe 2 Étalonnage des modèl
Page 139 and 140: 121 Références Aanes, R. , & R. A
Page 141 and 142: Bult, A., & C. B. Lynch. 1997. Nest
Page 143: 125 Creel, S. , 1. Winnie, B . Maxw
Page 147 and 148: 129 Hik, D. S. 1995. Does risk of p
Page 149 and 150: Lent, P. C. 1974. Mother-infant rel
Page 151 and 152: 133 Murray, D. L. , & S. Boutin. 19
Page 153 and 154: au Québec depuis 1984. Ministère
Page 155 and 156: 137 Proceedings of the Royal Societ
Page 157 and 158: 139 Tsiropoula, G. 2003. Signatures
show all

influence du climat et de la prÃ©dation sur l'utilisation de l'habitat et la ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?