influence du climat et de la prÃ©dation sur l'utilisation de l'habitat et la ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

130 Johnson, D. H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61 :65-71 . Jorgenson,1. T., M. FestaBianchet, 1. M . Gaillard, & W . D. Wishart. 1997. Effects of age, sex, disease, and density on survival ofbighorn sheep. Ecology 78:1019- 1032. Kaitala, V., & E. Ranta. 2001. Is the impact of environmental noise visible in the dynamics of age-structured populations? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London- Series B: Biological Sciences 268: 1769-1774. Keech, M. A., R. T. Bowyer, 1. M. Ver Hoef, R. D. Boertje, B . W . Dale, & T. R. Stephenson. 2000. Life-history consequences of maternaI condition in Alaskan moose. Journal of Wildlife Management 64:450-462 . Keller, F. L. 1935. Porcupines killed and eaten by a coyote. Journal of Mammalogy 16:232. Kie, 1. G. 1999. Optimal foraging and risk of predation: effects on behavior and social structure in ungulates. Journal of Mammalogy 80: 1114-1129. Klvana, 1., D. Berteaux, & B. Cazelles. 2004. Porcupine feeding scars and climatic data show ecosystem effects of the solar cycle. American Naturalist 164:283- 297. Korslund, L., & H. Steen. 2006. Small rodent winter survival: snow conditions limit access to food resources. Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 156-166. Kortner, G ., & F. Geiser. 2000. Torpor and activity patterns in free-ranging sugar gliders Petaurus breviceps (Marsupialia). Gecologia 123 :350-357. Krebs, C. 1. 1994. Ecology. Harper Collins College Publishers, New York, USA. Krebs, C. 1., & D. Berteaux. 2006. Problems and pitfalls in relating climate variability to population dynamics. Climate Research 32: 143-149. Kreith, F., & W. Z. Black. 1980. Basic heat transfer. Harper & Row, New York, USA. Langvatn, R., S. D. Albon, T. Burkey, & T. H. Clutton-Brock. 1996. Climate, plant phenology and variation in age of first reproduction in a temperate herbivore. Journal of Animal Ecology 65 :653-670. Larochelle, J. 1998. Comments on a negative appraisal of taxidermie mounts as tools for studies of ecological energetics. Physiological Zoology 71:596-598. Lean, 1., 1. Beer, & R. Bradley. 1995. Reconstruction ofsolar irradiance since 1610- Implications for climate-change. Geophysical Research Letlers 22:3195-3198 . Lebreton, 1.-D., K. P. Burnham, J. Clobert, & D. R. Anderson. 1992. Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animaIs: a unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs 62:67-118 . Lenart, E. A ., R. T. Bowyer, 1. Ver Hoef, & R. W. Ruess. 2002. Climate change and caribou: effects of summer weather on forage. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80:664-678. Lensing, 1. R. , & D . H. Wise. 2006. Predicted climate change alters the indirect effect of predators on an ecosystem process. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103:15502-15505.
Lent, P. C. 1974. Mother-infant relationships in ungulates. Pages 14-54 in V. Geist & F. Walther, editors. The behaviour ofungulates and its relation to management. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Morges, Switzerland. Leon, M. 1986. Development ofthermoregulation. Pages 297-322 in E. M . Blass, editor. Handbook of behavioral neurobiology: vol. 8. Developmental psychobiology and developmental neurobiology. Plenum Press, New York, USA. Levins, R. 1968. Evolution in changing environnements. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA. Lima, M. , 1. E. Keymer, & F. M. Jaksic. 1999. El nino-Southern oscillation-driven rainfall variability and delayed density dependence cause rodent outbreaks in Western South America: linking demography and population dynamics. American Naturalist 5:476-491. Lima, M. , N . Stenseth, & F. M . Jaksic. 2002a. Population dynamics of a South American rodent: seasonal structure interacting with climate, density dependence and predator effects. Proceedings of Royal Society of London - Series B: Biological Sciences 269:2579-25 86. Lima, M., N. C. Stenseth, & F. M . Jaksic. 2002b. Food web structure and climate effects on the dynamics of small mammals and owls in semi-arid Chile. Ecology Letters 5:273-284 . Lima, M., N. C. Stenseth, N. G. Yoccoz, & F. M. Jaksic. 2001. Demography and population dynamics of the mouse opossum (Thylamys elegans) in semi-arid Chile: seasonality, feedback structure and climate. Proceedings of Royal Society of London - Series B: Biological Sciences 268 :2053-2064 . Lima, S. L., & L. M . DilI. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the ri sk of predation - A review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68:61 9- 640. Lin, D. Y., & L. 1. Wei. 1989. The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards mode!. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84 :1074-1078. Lindstrom, E. R., & B. Hornfeldt. 1994. Vole cycles, snow depth and fox predation. Oikos 70: 156-160. Linnell,1. D. c., R. Aanes, & R. Andersen. 1995. Who killed Bambi? The role of predation in the neonatal mortality oftemperate ungulates. Wildlifè Biology 1:209-223. Loison, A., J. M . Gaillard, & H. Houssin. 1994. New insight on survivorship of female chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) from observation of marked animaIs. Canadian Journal ofZoology 72:591-597 . Loison, A., & R. Langvatn. 1998. Short- and long-term effects of winter and spring weather on growth and survival ofred deer in Norway. Oecologia 116:489- 500. Lustick, S. , B. Battersby, & M. Kelty. 1978. Behavioral thermoregulation - Orientation toward sun in herring gulls. Science 200 :8 1-83 . 131
Page 1 and 2:
UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À RIMOUSKI
Page 3 and 4:
Remerciements Cette thèse n'aurait
Page 5 and 6:
Table des matières LISTE DES TABLE
Page 7 and 8:
Liste des tableaux Chapitre 3 Table
Page 9 and 10:
VB Table 4.2 Power consumed (in Wat
Page 11 and 12:
Liste des figures Chapitre 1 Figure
Page 13 and 14:
XI Figure 2.3 Number oftimes ajuven
Page 15 and 16:
Xlll Figure 4.3 Time spent outside
Page 17 and 18:
Liste des annexes Annexe 1 Descript
Page 19 and 20:
Chapitre 1 Introduction 1.1 Impact
Page 21 and 22:
3 L ' importance relative des facte
Page 23 and 24:
5 des populations ne donne qu' une
Page 25 and 26:
7 (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) les
Page 27 and 28:
9 1940 1000 1960 139---------- c ~
Page 29 and 30:
1 1 (Roze 1987). Ils perdent 10 à
Page 31 and 32:
13 140 a) 1 20 - o -l- 2000 2001 20
Page 33 and 34:
15 manipulations et la pose d'émet
Page 35 and 36:
Chapitre 2 Handling North American
Page 37 and 38:
19 information is lacking in the pu
Page 39 and 40:
21 We searched for juvenile porcupi
Page 41 and 42:
23 Switzerland). To check sex and r
Page 43 and 44:
25 transmitters fo r larger units s
Page 45 and 46:
27 8 a) 7 "0 c: :l 0 6 -If) ~ c: 5
Page 47 and 48:
29 record sex, reproducti ve status
Page 49 and 50:
Chapitre 3 Predation as a possible
Page 51 and 52:
33 3.2. Introduction A growing numb
Page 53 and 54:
35 predation risk. To do so, we tes
Page 55 and 56:
37 Table 3.1 : Monitoring effort ac
Page 57 and 58:
39 winter precipitation (total prec
Page 59 and 60:
41 emaciated), road kills, dead fro
Page 61 and 62:
43 Seasonal survival rates The sele
Page 63 and 64:
45 >. 1.0 0.9 ..... 0.8 .c ta .c 0.
Page 65 and 66:
47 Causes of mortality We assigned
Page 67 and 68:
49 100 - 90 a) 80 1/) c: .2 iii ...
Page 69 and 70:
51 too simplistic to detect complex
Page 71 and 72:
53 correlated with winter survival
Page 73 and 74:
55 4.1. A bstract Because the clima
Page 75 and 76:
57 Ta, first because of the effects
Page 77 and 78:
59 Third, we evaluated the behaviou
Page 79 and 80:
61 pattern of den use over one or t
Page 81 and 82:
63 two modali ties, Table 4.1, mode
Page 83 and 84:
65 feeding behaviour for the popula
Page 85 and 86:
67 of Tc we considered. However, we
Page 87 and 88:
69 Calculating TefrOIn Ta, wind spe
Page 89 and 90:
71 Number and duration of activity
Page 91 and 92:
73 8 o _ --L-_ 0 Operative temperat
Page 93 and 94:
75 Beschta 2004). Predation rates w
Page 95 and 96:
77 in our population (chap. 3). Mal
Page 97 and 98: 79 Tableau 4.5 : Pourcentage d'obse
Page 99 and 100: 81 associées avec le temps de surv
Page 101 and 102: 83 5.1. Abstract ln many mammals, j
Page 103 and 104: 85 use of coyer influenced summer s
Page 105 and 106: 87 juvenile was moving to escape fr
Page 107 and 108: 89 individual (using approximations
Page 109 and 110: 91 den use (treated as a binary var
Page 111 and 112: 1 93 20 - 18 ~ a) DAvailable .Used
Page 113 and 114: 95 80 -, 70 l DAvailable .Used 60 -
Page 115 and 116: 97 Table 5.3: Use of coyer by juven
Page 117 and 118: 99 juveniles. At the microhabitat s
Page 119 and 120: 101 However, we think protection fr
Page 121 and 122: 103 we found that most mortalities
Page 123 and 124: Chapitre 6 Conclusion Dans le cadre
Page 125 and 126: 107 porcs-épics fréquentent les c
Page 127 and 128: 109 épies, via un impact des condi
Page 129 and 130: II I Hiver E n hi ver, on montre qu
Page 131 and 132: 113 compromis auquel les animaux fo
Page 133 and 134: 11 5 En été, la mortalité des je
Page 135 and 136: 117 pékan dans la région. On mont
Page 137 and 138: 119 Annexe 2 Étalonnage des modèl
Page 139 and 140: 121 Références Aanes, R. , & R. A
Page 141 and 142: Bult, A., & C. B. Lynch. 1997. Nest
Page 143 and 144: 125 Creel, S. , 1. Winnie, B . Maxw
Page 145 and 146: 127 Fortin, D., & G. Gauthier. 2000
Page 147: 129 Hik, D. S. 1995. Does risk of p
Page 151 and 152: 133 Murray, D. L. , & S. Boutin. 19
Page 153 and 154: au Québec depuis 1984. Ministère
Page 155 and 156: 137 Proceedings of the Royal Societ
Page 157 and 158: 139 Tsiropoula, G. 2003. Signatures
show all

influence du climat et de la prÃ©dation sur l'utilisation de l'habitat et la ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?