13.09.2014 Views

Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada

Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada

Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Synthesis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Operations</strong> March 2003<br />

Pedestrian Refuge Islands and Split PXOs<br />

iTrans (2002)<br />

The safety <strong>of</strong> pedestrian refuge islands and split pedestrian crossovers (SPXOs) were<br />

investigated by the City <strong>of</strong> Toronto (iTrans, 2002). A brief description <strong>of</strong> each device is<br />

as follows:<br />

• Pedestrian refuge island are raised islands approximately 1.8 metres wide and 11<br />

metres long located in the middle <strong>of</strong> roads that are 16 metres wide. Pedestrian<br />

warning signs are located upstream on the vehicular approaches, end island<br />

markers and keep right signs are posted on both ends <strong>of</strong> the island, pedestrian<br />

entrances are posted with “Wait <strong>for</strong> Gap” and “Cross Here” signs. Legislation<br />

does not provide the pedestrian with the right-<strong>of</strong>-way.<br />

• Pedestrian crossovers are an Ontario-specific traffic control device that consists<br />

<strong>of</strong> a combination <strong>of</strong> static traffic signs, an internally illuminated overhead<br />

“pedestrian crossing” sign, and pedestrian activated flashing amber beacons. It<br />

is fully described in the Ontario Manual <strong>of</strong> Uni<strong>for</strong>m <strong>Traffic</strong> Control Devices.<br />

Essentially a driver approaching an activated PXO must yield the right-<strong>of</strong>-way to<br />

the pedestrian, and may proceed once the pedestrian has cleared the driver’s half<br />

<strong>of</strong> the roadway. The islands present at SPXOs are <strong>of</strong> the same general design as<br />

the pedestrian refuge islands. SPXOs are also outfitted with pedestrian warning<br />

signs, keep right signs, and end island markers, however, pedestrian signing is<br />

“Caution Push Button to Activate Early Warning System”.<br />

The research included 30 pedestrian refuge islands and 20 SPXOs, in a direct comparison<br />

<strong>of</strong> the safety per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> both devices. In addition, a be<strong>for</strong>e-after study to determine<br />

the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> pedestrian refuge islands was undertaken. The crash results from the<br />

direct comparison between the two devices are shown in Table 6.2.<br />

TABLE 6.2: <strong>Safety</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> Pedestrian Devices in Toronto<br />

Total Crashes per Crash Severity (%)<br />

<strong>Traffic</strong><br />

location<br />

Control<br />

Fatal Injury PDO<br />

(crashes/year)<br />

Pedestrian<br />

Refuge Island<br />

0.7 3 42 55<br />

SPXO 3.6 1 47 52<br />

The crash frequency at the SPXO locations is 5.5 times higher than the crash frequency at<br />

the pedestrian refuge islands. Although exposure is not accounted <strong>for</strong> in this statistic,<br />

elsewhere in the report it is noted that the pedestrian volumes at SPXOs average four<br />

times the pedestrian volumes at the refuge islands.<br />

Page 81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!