13.09.2014 Views

Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada

Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada

Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Synthesis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Operations</strong> March 2003<br />

increasing an average <strong>of</strong> 11%. The researchers re-examined the crash frequency 13<br />

years after stop sign installation and found the crash frequency had increased to 3.3<br />

crashes/intersection/year (CMF = 0.15). The traffic volumes at this time are not reported.<br />

Laplante and Kropidlowski also were concerned about crash migration to the streets<br />

surrounding the treated neighbourhood. An examination <strong>of</strong> the crash frequency at the 10<br />

stop controlled intersections on the four peripheral streets (arterials or collectors)<br />

decreased from 27.9 crashes/intersection/year to 19.7 crashes/intersection/year. Again<br />

traffic volume changes are not reported. However, the analysts make note that the total<br />

number <strong>of</strong> crashes in Chicago increased during the study period.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the Laplante and Kropidlowski study are questionable based on a likely<br />

regression-to-the-mean bias. Site selection is not detailed in the documentation.<br />

However, a crash frequency <strong>of</strong> 21.3 crashes/year at a low-volume intersection is certainly<br />

considered abnormally high. It would appear that these intersections were selected based<br />

on their high crash frequency. Moreover, the sample size (nine intersections) is very<br />

small and a lack <strong>of</strong> statistical analysis does not provide the reader with any in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

on the variability <strong>of</strong> the results.<br />

Intersection Control Beacons<br />

Pant et al (1999)<br />

Pant et al (1999) undertook a cross-section, and be<strong>for</strong>e-after study <strong>of</strong> six stop-controlled<br />

intersections and seven stop-controlled intersections that were supplemented with<br />

beacons. The sites were rural intersections located in Ohio. The study sites were<br />

selected because <strong>of</strong> the availability <strong>of</strong> complete traffic and crash data <strong>for</strong> four years but<br />

were matched on the following geometrics:<br />

• The angle <strong>of</strong> intersection was approximately 90 degrees;<br />

• All legs had a single approach lane;<br />

• All intersections were located in a rural area and had no substantial development<br />

around the intersection; and<br />

• The posted speed limit was 55 mph in the major direction.<br />

The researchers speculate that the intersections that are supplemented with beacons were<br />

done so because <strong>of</strong> an abnormal crash record.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the cross-section study are shown in Table 3.26.<br />

Page 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!