Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada
Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada
Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Synthesis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Operations</strong> March 2003<br />
Flashing Beacons with Supplementary Signs<br />
Van Houten (unpublished)<br />
Van Houten (unpublished) examined the effects <strong>of</strong> pedestrian-activated flashing beacons<br />
supplemented with traffic signs on vehicle-pedestrian conflicts at two locations in<br />
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia. The activated beacons, which have been in solo use, are amber<br />
in colour, and suspended over the crosswalk. A sign placed on the pole displayed the<br />
message “PRESS BUTTON TO ALERT MOTORISTS.” The beacons continued to flash<br />
<strong>for</strong> 35 seconds once activated.<br />
The beacons were supplemented with an internally illuminated pictogram <strong>of</strong> a pedestrian<br />
(pictogram) that was placed between the two flashing beacons, and advance warning<br />
signs (advance sign) displaying a pictogram <strong>of</strong> a pedestrian, and the legend “YIELD<br />
WHEN FLASHING”. One site was located at an intersection, and the other was a<br />
midblock crosswalk linking a major community recreation facility with a convention<br />
centre. Both crosswalks traversed a divided six-lane street with a speed limit <strong>of</strong> 50 km/h.<br />
No indication <strong>of</strong> site selection procedures is provided.<br />
The safety impacts were measured by proportion <strong>of</strong> pedestrians who activated the<br />
beacons, yielding behaviour <strong>of</strong> drivers, and vehicle-pedestrian conflicts. As we are<br />
unaware <strong>of</strong> any research that definitively links activations and yielding behaviour to crash<br />
occurrence, only the conflict data is reported in this report. A vehicle-pedestrian conflict<br />
was scored whenever:<br />
• a motorist had to engage in abrupt audible braking, or change lanes abruptly to<br />
avoid striking a pedestrian; or<br />
• a pedestrian had to jump or suddenly step back to avoid being struck by a vehicle.<br />
The researchers controlled <strong>for</strong> exposure by examining 48 pedestrians per day, who<br />
crossed when traffic was present. The results <strong>of</strong> the study are shown in Table 6.4.<br />
TABLE 6.4: <strong>Traffic</strong> Conflicts at Different Crosswalk Treatments<br />
<strong>Traffic</strong> Conflicts per session<br />
<strong>Traffic</strong> Control<br />
Location<br />
1 2<br />
Beacon Only 1.0 3.0<br />
Beacon+Pictogram 0.91 N/A*<br />
Beacon+Advance Sign N/A* 0.37<br />
Beacon+Pictogram+Advance Sign 0.25 0.67<br />
*The revisions to the traffic control were introduced sequentially at each location, with the pictogram being<br />
introduced first at Site 1, and the advance sign being introduced first at Site 2.<br />
Page 83