13.09.2014 Views

Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada

Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada

Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Intersection Control<br />

where:<br />

X1 = 0 if main road left-turns are permitted; 1 otherwise<br />

X2 = Average lane width on main road (metres)<br />

X3 = 1 if the number <strong>of</strong> lanes on main road is 3 or less;<br />

0 otherwise<br />

X4 = 1 if the number <strong>of</strong> lanes on main road is 4 or 5; 0 otherwise<br />

X5 = 1 if no access control on main road; 0 otherwise<br />

X6 = 1 if right-turn is NOT free flow from main road; 0 otherwise<br />

X7 = 1 if no illumination; 0 otherwise<br />

X8 = 1 if the main road is a minor arterial; 0 otherwise<br />

X9 = 1 if the main road is a major collector; 0 otherwise<br />

Signal-controlled<br />

N = 0.032452 ADT main 0.503 ADT side<br />

0.224<br />

e 0.063X1 e 0.622X2 e -0.200X3 e -0.310X4 e -0.130X5<br />

e -0.053X6 e -0.115X7 e -0.225X8 e -0.130X9 [3.8]<br />

where:<br />

X1 = 1 if pre-timed signal; 0 otherwise<br />

X2 = 1 if fully-actuated signal; 0 otherwise<br />

X3 = 0 if two-phase signal; 1 otherwise<br />

X4 = 1 if no access control on main road; 0 otherwise<br />

X5 = 1 if 3 or less lanes on the side road; 0 otherwise<br />

X6 = Average lane width on main road (metres)<br />

X7 = 0 if no free flow right turn from main road; 1 otherwise<br />

X8 = 1 if 3 or less lanes on the main road; 0 otherwise<br />

X9 = 1 if 4 or 5 lanes on the main road; 0 otherwise<br />

These models can be used to determine the impacts <strong>of</strong> signalization (or the removal <strong>of</strong> a<br />

signal). Caution should be exercised in relying solely on the prediction models. First <strong>of</strong><br />

all, it is a better estimate <strong>of</strong> the long-term safety <strong>of</strong> a facility if the results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

prediction model can be combined with the actual safety per<strong>for</strong>mance (i.e., crash history)<br />

<strong>of</strong> the site. Secondly, there are some aspects <strong>of</strong> the above models that seem to be<br />

counterintuitive. For instance, in the model <strong>for</strong> stop-controlled intersections, controls on<br />

access, and the provision <strong>of</strong> illumination are seen to be detrimental to safety (CMFs <strong>of</strong><br />

1.55 and 1.17, respectively). The conventional wisdom disagrees with these findings and<br />

casts some doubt on the usefulness <strong>of</strong> these equations.<br />

Harwood et al (2000)<br />

Harwood et al (2000) also developed SPFs <strong>for</strong> cross intersections <strong>of</strong> two-lane roads in<br />

rural settings. The models are as follows:<br />

Page 24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!