13.09.2014 Views

Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada

Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada

Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Legislation and En<strong>for</strong>cement<br />

non-intersection and parking crash rates, and the proportion <strong>of</strong> parking crashes as the<br />

metrics. Parking crashes were defined as crashes that involved a parked vehicle or a<br />

vehicle that was either parking or unparking. Crashes that were caused by a vehicle<br />

slowing or stopped to park, but that did not involve the parking vehicle were not included<br />

in parking crashes because <strong>of</strong> limitations on data.<br />

The crash rates <strong>for</strong> the different types <strong>of</strong> parking are shown in Table 8.15.<br />

TABLE 8.15: Crash Rates <strong>for</strong> Curbside Parking in Nebraska<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> Parking Major Street<br />

Two-way, two-lane streets<br />

Nonintersectiointersection<br />

Non-<br />

Parking<br />

Parking<br />

Crash Rate<br />

Crash Rate<br />

Crash Rate<br />

Crash Rate<br />

Crashes per MVM<br />

Painted Parking<br />

Parallel 1.65 0.55 1.83 0.85<br />

Low-angle --- --- 3.38 2.60 +<br />

High-angle 1.20 0.53 3.59 2.91 +<br />

Unpainted<br />

Parking<br />

Parallel 1.32 0.28 0.67 0.26<br />

Angle 1.57 0.52 1.67 1.11 +<br />

Crashes per BVMHPS*<br />

Painted Parking<br />

Parallel 6.50 2.17 6.58 3.05<br />

Low-angle --- --- 9.59 7.38 +<br />

High-angle 7.19 3.19 12.90 + 10.50 +<br />

Unpainted<br />

Parking<br />

Parallel 7.67 1.65 5.44 2.13<br />

Angle 13.19 + 4.40 + 12.10 + 8.04 +<br />

*BVMHPS = Billion vehicle-miles-hours per stall<br />

+ Significantly different from equivalent parallel parking at 5% level <strong>of</strong> significance<br />

The crash rates calculated using exposure that is based on traffic volume and parking<br />

activity (i.e., crashes per BVMHPS) is likely to provide the most valid measure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relative safety <strong>of</strong> the different types <strong>of</strong> curbside parking. In all cases, the streets that<br />

permit parallel parking have lower crash rates than the streets with angle parking.<br />

Moreover, the low-angle parking yields typically lower crash rates than the high-angle<br />

parking streets.<br />

Recognizing the limitations <strong>of</strong> a cross-sectional study in determining the relative safety <strong>of</strong><br />

a particular treatment, McCoy et al attempted to control <strong>for</strong> several confounders by re-<br />

Page 102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!