13.09.2014 Views

Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada

Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada

Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Synthesis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Operations</strong> March 2003<br />

Region <strong>of</strong> Waterloo (2001)<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> an ongoing program the Region <strong>of</strong> Waterloo, Ontario routinely assesses the<br />

street system <strong>for</strong> locations with an elevated risk <strong>for</strong> motor vehicle crashes, and<br />

implements appropriate countermeasures. The Region <strong>of</strong> Waterloo (2001) reports that in<br />

1998 three locations were changed from stop control to signal control with results as<br />

shown in Table 3.19.<br />

TABLE 3.19: <strong>Safety</strong> Effects <strong>of</strong> Signalization in Waterloo, Ontario<br />

Location<br />

Crash Frequency<br />

Be<strong>for</strong>e After<br />

CMF<br />

A 7 5 0.71<br />

B 8 3 0.38<br />

C 9 4 0.44<br />

Average 8 4 0.50<br />

The Waterloo analysis is a naïve be<strong>for</strong>e-after study <strong>of</strong> crash frequency using one-year <strong>of</strong><br />

be<strong>for</strong>e and one year <strong>of</strong> after data. Furthermore, the traffic signals were installed, at least<br />

in part, because these locations had an aberrant crash record. The results are very<br />

unreliable due to a failure to account regression-to-the-mean, the limited sample size, and<br />

the failure to account <strong>for</strong> exposure.<br />

Pernia et al (2002)<br />

Florida’s investigation into the safety impacts <strong>of</strong> signalization included developing crash<br />

prediction models <strong>for</strong> 447 intersections that were signalized between 1990 and 1997<br />

(Pernia et al, 2002). The models included crashes that occurred within three years <strong>of</strong><br />

signalization (i.e., three years be<strong>for</strong>e, and three years after), and captured all crashes<br />

within 76 metres (250 feet) from the point <strong>of</strong> intersection along the major road. It is<br />

recognized that regression-to-the-mean bias may be present in the dataset; it was not<br />

addressed in the analysis.<br />

The <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> equation used in the analysis was as follows:<br />

N = exp(a + C 1 X 1 + C 2 X 2 + … + C n X n ) [3.15]<br />

Where:<br />

N = Annual number <strong>of</strong> crashes<br />

a = constant as shown in Table 3.16<br />

X n = Independent variables as shown in Table 3.16<br />

C n = (“value” multiplied by “coefficient”) from Table 3.16<br />

Page 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!