Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada
Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada
Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Synthesis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Operations</strong> March 2003<br />
Vogt (1999)<br />
Vogt (1999) in developing crash models <strong>for</strong> rural intersections examined the safety<br />
impacts <strong>of</strong> protected left-turn phasing <strong>for</strong> the major road <strong>of</strong> signalized intersections with<br />
four approaches. Forty-nine signalized intersections were included in the analysis.<br />
Negative binomial regression analysis was used to model all crashes within 250 feet <strong>of</strong><br />
the intersection on the main road, and with 100 and 250 feet <strong>of</strong> the intersection on the<br />
side road, in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia and Michigan, respectively. Three years <strong>of</strong> crash data were used<br />
in the analysis.<br />
Vogt found that protected left-turn phasing <strong>for</strong> the major road at a rural, 4-legged,<br />
signalized intersection yields a CMF <strong>of</strong> 0.51.<br />
Bauer and Harwood (2000)<br />
Bauer and Harwood (2000) using three years <strong>of</strong> crash data from Cali<strong>for</strong>nia developed<br />
crash prediction models <strong>for</strong> several types <strong>of</strong> rural and urban intersections. Model<br />
development used statistical sound procedures. With respect to signalized intersections,<br />
only urban intersections with four approaches were modelled. It was found that signal<br />
timing produced the CMFs shown in Table 3.53.<br />
TABLE 3.53: CMFs <strong>for</strong> Signal Timing Changes<br />
Treatment<br />
CMF<br />
Pretimed to Semiactuated 0.94<br />
Pretimed to Fully actuated 1.75<br />
Two-phase to multi-phase 0.82<br />
Thomas and Smith (2001)<br />
Thomas and Smith (2001) undertook an examination <strong>of</strong> the safety impacts <strong>of</strong> left turn<br />
phasing at four intersections in Iowa. The site selection process is not described; the<br />
study methodology is a naïve be<strong>for</strong>e-after analysis using crash frequency and severity.<br />
The crash frequency is comprised <strong>of</strong> three years <strong>of</strong> be<strong>for</strong>e and three years <strong>of</strong> after data<br />
categorized by severity, and several impact types. The exact change in signal phasing is<br />
not described. The results are shown in Table 3.54.<br />
The results indicate that under a 90% degree <strong>of</strong> confidence, safety benefits can be<br />
expected <strong>for</strong> total crashes (CMF = 0.64). The aetiology suggests that the majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />
safety gains would be a reduction in left-turn crashes. Exposure was not accounted <strong>for</strong> in<br />
the analysis, as this data was not readily available.<br />
Page 57