13.09.2014 Views

Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada

Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada

Synthesis of Safety for Traffic Operations - Transports Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Synthesis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Operations</strong> March 2003<br />

Region <strong>of</strong> Halton (2001)<br />

The Region <strong>of</strong> Halton, Ontario has also developed SPFs <strong>for</strong> their signalized and<br />

unsignalized intersections, disaggregated by severity. These SPFs can be used to<br />

estimate the safety impacts <strong>of</strong> signalization through comparison. The <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> the SPFs<br />

are as per Equation 3.14, the parameters are estimated in Table 3.15 and 3.16 <strong>for</strong><br />

signalized and unsignalized intersections, respectively.<br />

N = a TOTAL b1 RATIO b2 [3.14]<br />

where:<br />

TOTAL = AADT main + AADT minor<br />

RATIO = AADT minor / TOTAL<br />

AADT main = Average daily traffic entering from the main road<br />

AADT minor =Average daily traffic entering from the minor road<br />

TABLE 3.15: Region <strong>of</strong> Halton – Signalized intersections<br />

a<br />

Type Environment<br />

b<br />

Fatal+Injury PDO 1 b 2<br />

3-leg All 7.0E-5 2.5E-4 0.934 0.165<br />

Urban/Suburban 8.1E-3 2.32E-2 0.591 0.688<br />

4-leg<br />

Rural 1.04E-3 3.16E-3 0.581 -0.940<br />

TABLE 3.16: Region <strong>of</strong> Halton – Unsignalized intersections<br />

Type Environment<br />

a<br />

Fatal+Injury PDO<br />

b 1 b 2<br />

3-leg All 2.5E-3 7.32E-3 0.614 0.5253<br />

4-leg All 7.2E-4 1.64E-3 0.838 0.591<br />

Thomas and Smith (2001)<br />

Thomas and Smith (2001) undertook an examination <strong>of</strong> the safety impacts <strong>of</strong><br />

signalization at 16 intersections in various municipalities in Iowa. The site selection<br />

process is not described; the study methodology is a naïve be<strong>for</strong>e-after analysis using<br />

crash frequency and severity. The crash frequency is comprised <strong>of</strong> three years <strong>of</strong> be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

and three years <strong>of</strong> after data categorized by severity, and several impact types. Some<br />

“outliers” were removed from the data set, as they were skewing the results. The results<br />

are shown in Table 3.17.<br />

Page 27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!