Long Term Community Plan 2012-2022 - Hurunui District Council
Long Term Community Plan 2012-2022 - Hurunui District Council
Long Term Community Plan 2012-2022 - Hurunui District Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
www.hurunui.govt.nz<br />
Service<br />
Relevant<br />
<strong>Community</strong><br />
Outcomes<br />
Relevant Issues &<br />
Constraints<br />
Who benefits, and<br />
over what period<br />
Future Funding & Sustainability<br />
Environment and<br />
Safety – Animal<br />
Control<br />
The <strong>Council</strong>’s funding<br />
Animal Control services<br />
contributes to the<br />
<strong>Hurunui</strong> district being:<br />
A desirable and safe<br />
place to live:<br />
- We have attractive<br />
well designed<br />
townships<br />
- Communities have<br />
access to adequate<br />
health and emergency<br />
services and systems<br />
and resources are<br />
available to meet civil<br />
defence emergencies<br />
A place that<br />
d e m o n s t r a t e s<br />
e n v i r o n m e n t a l<br />
responsibility:<br />
- We protect our<br />
environment while<br />
preserving people’s<br />
property rights<br />
- We minimise<br />
solid waste to the<br />
fullest extent, and<br />
manage the rest in a<br />
sustainable way<br />
Those who use the<br />
service benefit more<br />
than those who do<br />
not, hence, for reasons<br />
of transparency and<br />
accountability, there is<br />
justification for funding<br />
it distinctly from<br />
other services. There<br />
are no significant<br />
costs involved in<br />
this distinction. Dog<br />
registration cost issues<br />
and recovery of costs<br />
associated with dog<br />
control are set out in<br />
the Dog Control Act.<br />
Dog owners question<br />
what benefit they<br />
derive from the<br />
- Risks to public<br />
health are identified<br />
and appropriately registration<br />
managed<br />
process.<br />
Do the majority<br />
of owners pay for<br />
the minority who<br />
are negligent in<br />
their ownership<br />
responsibilities? While<br />
this is a valid question,<br />
it is impractical to<br />
amend the system as<br />
to do so would cost<br />
more than any gain<br />
that would be derived.<br />
Dog and animal<br />
control legislation<br />
is clearly based on a<br />
mix of the principle<br />
that the owner should<br />
pay for animal control<br />
“incidents” with the<br />
establishment of the<br />
service being a public<br />
good.<br />
100% benefit to animal<br />
owners for incidents<br />
and 100% benefit to<br />
the <strong>District</strong> as a whole<br />
for service readiness.<br />
This latter benefit will<br />
relate to the area of<br />
land owned (the more<br />
land, the more scope<br />
for wandering stock),<br />
and thus for all practical<br />
purposes may be tied<br />
to its Capital Value.<br />
100% benefit to<br />
the dog owner for<br />
incidents; 100% dog<br />
registration fee for<br />
readiness.<br />
No significant capital<br />
expenditure is involved<br />
with this service.<br />
All operational<br />
expenditure is applied<br />
to the pro- vision of<br />
service in the year it is<br />
collected.<br />
Dog Registration:<br />
Process and standby (including record keeping) are funded by<br />
the dog registration fee.<br />
The owner pays with the shortfall (eg: complaint unfounded,<br />
dog gone, etc), funded by dog registration fees.<br />
Stock Control:<br />
Costs relating to animal or stock control are paid 100% from<br />
stock owners; the balance of remaining costs to be met from<br />
the <strong>District</strong> Rate.<br />
Sustainability:<br />
The negative impact of the cost of this service is offset by the<br />
social wellbeing through having a safe and healthy communities.<br />
246