Long Term Community Plan 2012-2022 - Hurunui District Council
Long Term Community Plan 2012-2022 - Hurunui District Council
Long Term Community Plan 2012-2022 - Hurunui District Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Activity 1: Roads and Footpaths<br />
Overview<br />
The Roads and Footpaths activity includes the various functions<br />
of street lighting, bridges and road safety, as well as roads and<br />
footpaths.<br />
<strong>Hurunui</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>Long</strong> <strong>Term</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>2012</strong> - <strong>2022</strong><br />
We are an active member of the ‘<strong>Hurunui</strong> <strong>District</strong> Road Safety<br />
Coordinating Committee’. The committee has a Road Safety<br />
Strategy which provides a framework for a road safety policy<br />
and initiatives in our district, together with practical, long term<br />
community solutions.<br />
Current Situation<br />
The Roading Network activity deals with the day-to-day<br />
operations, maintenance and improvements of road pavement<br />
(renewals, improvements and upgrades), signs, street lighting,<br />
parking, cleaning, bridge maintenance, corridor management,<br />
overweight and oversize permits, licenses to occupy and<br />
various road safety activities. These initiatives are supported<br />
through policy development and forward planning, including<br />
linking in with transport and land use planning and road safety<br />
coordination.<br />
Our roads are maintained and built using subsidy funds from<br />
New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) and moneys collected<br />
through local rates. This excludes state highways which are<br />
funded and maintained solely through NZTA. Three years ago,<br />
central government deliberately cut maintenance funding to<br />
all district councils, as it decided to focus on capital works to<br />
national state highways (Roads of National Significance) and the<br />
Auckland roading network needs as priorities. Our funding was<br />
cut by $600,000 per annum on average, for the full funding cycle<br />
2009/<strong>2012</strong>.<br />
Our Asset Management <strong>Plan</strong> (AMP) for roading is an important<br />
plan when it comes to planning and deciding on upgrades,<br />
maintenance and new work. An ongoing challenge is to match<br />
the level of service provided by the roading asset with the<br />
expectations of our community.<br />
The district’s roading network comprises of approximately<br />
1455 kilometres of local roads (excluding state highways), 278<br />
bridges, 94,204 square metres of footpaths, 60kilometres of<br />
kerb and channeling, 886 streetlights, 4622 traffic signs and 43<br />
kilometres of culvert pipes. Each road in the roading network<br />
has been categorized into a roading hierarchy (in the <strong>District</strong><br />
<strong>Plan</strong>) based on the road’s purpose and level of use. Of the 1455<br />
km local roads, 1380 kilometres are rural and 75 kilometres are<br />
urban. 602 kilometres of the road network is sealed, with 853<br />
kilometres remaining unsealed to date.<br />
Current desirable levels of service have been defined against<br />
urban and rural road hierarchy categories. These are 6<br />
carriageway service indicators (Quality, Safety, Environment,<br />
Efficiency, Comfort/Convenience and capacity and 5 associated<br />
roading asset service indicators (kerb and channel; bridges;<br />
street lighting; road marking; and signs). The road hierarchy<br />
established is designed to meet the expected levels of service<br />
(as per the AMP), although incomplete inventory data for some<br />
assets limits a full assessment. The levels of service defined in<br />
the AMP inform the performance measures set out in this plan.<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>s for the future<br />
The roading network uses a significant share of our annual<br />
expenditure (almost 25%), and it is planned that this will continue<br />
on a long term basis. Whereas the AMP provides important<br />
information for the work programme, we also routinely monitor,<br />
audit and assess, using traffic counts on a rotational basis to<br />
collect data about trends. <strong>Hurunui</strong> is a large district with a small<br />
population (rating base), therefore it is crucial that priority is<br />
given to roads and bridges that serve important functions, such<br />
as road safety, and have high traffic use.<br />
NZTA have released indicative allocation budget figures for<br />
road maintenance through <strong>2012</strong>-2015, which are 5% less than<br />
our original Regional Land Transport Programme submission<br />
requests. Although these budget amounts are 3.4% more than<br />
the 2009-<strong>2012</strong> budget allocations, they equate to $226,000<br />
less per annum across the three year programme. Coming to<br />
grips with a total $1.6 million reduced budget is going to be<br />
major challenge to both assets and operations alike. Our Asset<br />
Management <strong>Plan</strong>s (AMPs) tell us when, how and why we need<br />
to do work on each of our roads to ensure maximum wholeof-life<br />
for this asset (maximum return on investment approach);<br />
but we do not have the required subsidised income to maintain<br />
our roading network to the level our AMPs stipulate. We<br />
will continue to retain our funding as previously indicated as<br />
unsubsidised work and the rate impact for roading will continue<br />
as previously stated in the plan. We have made the assumption<br />
that the reduced level of NZTA funding will continue through<br />
the life of the LTP.<br />
We have done our best to get greater efficiencies within our<br />
current road maintenance contracts, without affecting the<br />
current levels of service (LoS). At the end of this period, our<br />
maintenance contracts will be renewed with cost escalations<br />
included. NZTA have declared that they will not pick up contract<br />
price escalations through their road maintenance subsidy<br />
scheme. This implies that the ratepayer will have to cover this<br />
shortfall otherwise less and less will be physically spent on<br />
maintenance outputs resulting in loss of road asset life and<br />
potentially putting road’s lives at risk driving on a compromised<br />
infrastructure. Thus, NZTA and Central Government are<br />
imposing more and more responsibility upon the local ratepayer<br />
to fund their roading infrastructure’s needs, unless the Minister<br />
of Transport is lobbied by all affected stakeholders to reverse<br />
this tactic and strategy.<br />
The financial savings effected through the last road maintenance<br />
tender round will sustain the infrastructure for the following<br />
year (<strong>2012</strong>-2013), but after that, we will have to seriously<br />
consider what elements of the planned works will have to be<br />
85