24.12.2014 Views

1nCnVqgFI

1nCnVqgFI

1nCnVqgFI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a<br />

THE FOUR DIMENSIONS OF SPACE. 271<br />

Heavens," which are three Earths or Globes also, only far more ethereal,<br />

on the ascending or spiritual arc. By the first three we descend into<br />

Matter, by the other three we ascend into Spirit ;<br />

the lowest one, Bhumi,<br />

our Earth, forming the turning point, so to say, and containing, potentially,<br />

as much of Spirit as it does of Matter. But we shall treat of this<br />

hereafter.<br />

The general teaching of the Commentar>% then, is that everj^ new<br />

Round develops one of the Compound Elements, as now known to<br />

Science, which rejects the primitive nomenclature, preferring to subdivide<br />

them into constituents. If Nature is the "Ever-Becoming" on<br />

the manifested plane, then these Elements are to be regarded in the<br />

same light: they have to evolve, progress, and increase to the manvantaric<br />

end.<br />

Thus the First Round, we are taught, developed but one Element,<br />

and a nature and humanity in what may be spoken of as one aspect of<br />

Nature—called by some, very unscientifically, though it may be so<br />

defacto, "one-dimensional space."<br />

The Second Round brought forth and developed two Elements,<br />

Fire and Earth ; and its humanity, adapted to this condition of Nature,<br />

if we can give the name humanity to beings living under conditions<br />

now unknown to men, was—to use again a familiar phrase in a strictly<br />

figurative sense, the only way in which it can be used correctly—<br />

"two-dimensional" species.<br />

The processes of natural development which we are now considering<br />

will at once elucidate and discredit the fashion of speculating on the<br />

attributes of two, three, and/our or more dirneyisional space; but, in passing,<br />

it is worth while to point out the real significance of the sound,<br />

but incomplete, intuition that has prompted—among Spiritualists and<br />

TheosophLsts, and several great men of Science, for the matter of that*<br />

—the use of the modern expression, the "fourth dimension of space."<br />

To begin with, the superficial absurdity of assuming that Space itself<br />

is measurable in any direction is of little consequence. The familiar<br />

phrase can only be an abbreviation of the fuller form—the "-fourth dimension<br />

of matter, in Spaced \ But even thus expanded, it is an unhappy<br />

phrase, because while it is perfectly true that the progress of<br />

• Professor ZSllner's theory has been more than welcomed by several Scientists, who are also<br />

Spiritualists; Professors Butlerof and Wagner, of St. Petersburg:, for instance.<br />

i- " The pfiving reality to abstractions is the error of Realism. Space and Time are frequently viewed<br />

a.s separated from all the concrete experiences of the mind, instead of being generalizations of these<br />

in certain aspects." (Bain, Log^'r, Part II. p. 389.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!