24.12.2014 Views

1nCnVqgFI

1nCnVqgFI

1nCnVqgFI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

512 THK SECRET DOCTRINE.<br />

Buddhi, the Sixth Principle, or Divine Soul in man.<br />

sense, Avalokiteshvara-Kwan-Shi-Yin, referred to as<br />

In a still higher<br />

the seventh Universal<br />

Principle, is the Logos perceived by the Universal Buddhi, or<br />

Soul, as the synthetic aggregate of the Dhyani-Buddhas ; and is not<br />

the "Spirit of Buddha present in the Church," but the Omnipresent<br />

Universal Spirit manifested in the temple of Kosmos or Nature.<br />

This<br />

Orientalistic etymology of Kwan and Yin is on a par with that of<br />

Yogini, which, we are told by Mr. Hargrave Jennings, is a Sanskrit<br />

word, "in the dialects pronounced Jogi or Zogee (!), and is . . .<br />

equivalent with Sena, and exactly the same as Duti or Dutica," i.e., a<br />

sacred prostitute of the temple, worshipped as Yoni or Shakti.* "The<br />

books of morality [in India] direct a faithful wife to shun the society of<br />

Yogini or females who have been adored as Sacti."t Nothing should<br />

surprise us after this. And it is, therefore, with hardly a smile that we<br />

find another preposterous absurdity quoted about "Budh," as being a<br />

name "which signifies not only the sun as the source of generation<br />

but also the male organ."| Max Miiller, in treating of "False Analogies,"<br />

says that "the most celebrated Chinese scholar of his time, Abel<br />

Remusat . . . maintains that the three syllables I Hi Wei [in the<br />

fourteenth chapter of the Tao-te-King] were meant for Je-ho-vah";§<br />

and again. Father Amyot "felt certain that the three persons of the<br />

Trinity could be recognized" in the same work. And if Abel Remusat,<br />

why not Hargrave Jennings Every scholar will recognize the absurdity<br />

of ever seeing in Budh, the "enlightened" and the "awakened,"<br />

a "phallic sj'mbol."<br />

Kwan-Shi-Yin, then, is "the Son identical with his Father," mystically,<br />

or the Logos, the Word. He is called the "Dragon of Wisdom,"<br />

in Stanza III, for all the Logoi of all the ancient religious systems are<br />

connected with, and symbolized by, serpents. In old Egypt, the God<br />

Nahbkoon, "he who unites the doubles," was represented as a serpent<br />

on human legs, either with or without arms. This was the Astral<br />

Light reiiniting by its dual physiological and spiritual potency the<br />

Divine-Human to its purely Divine Monad, the Prototype in "Heaven"<br />

or Nature. It was the emblem of the resurrection of Nature ; of Christ<br />

with the Ophites ; and of Jehovah as the brazen serpent healing those<br />

who looked at him. The serpent was also an emblem of Christ with<br />

* op. cit., p. 60.<br />

t- Ibid.<br />

t O'Brien, Round Towers of Ireland, p. 61, quoted by Hargrave Jennings in his Phallicism, p. 246.<br />

\ Introduction to the Science of Religion, p. 332.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!