24.12.2014 Views

1nCnVqgFI

1nCnVqgFI

1nCnVqgFI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

:<br />

306 THEJ SECRET DOCTRINE.<br />

much distorted in some passages by Christian "smoothing," was nevertheless<br />

written by a philosopher, while most of the so-called "Hermetic<br />

Fragments" are the production of sectarian pagans with a tendency<br />

towards an anthropomorphic Supreme Being. Yet both are the echo<br />

of the Esoteric Philosophy and the Hindu Puranas.<br />

Compare two invocations, one to the Hermetic "Supreme All," the<br />

other to the "Supreme All" of the later Aryans. Says a Hermetic<br />

Vragment cited by Suidas :<br />

1 adjure thee, Heaven, holy work of the great God; I adjure thee. Voice of the<br />

Father, uttered in the beginning when the universal world was framed; I adjure<br />

thee by the Word, only Son of the Father Who upholds all things;<br />

be favourable.*<br />

This is preceded by the following:<br />

be favourable,<br />

Thus the Ideal Light was before the Ideal Light, and the luminous Intelligence<br />

of Intelligence was always, and Us unity was nothing else than the Spirit enveloping<br />

the Universe. Out of Whom [ Which'] is neither God nor Angels, nor any other<br />

essentials, for He [It] is the Lord of all things and the Power and the Light; and all<br />

depends on Him [It] and is in Him [It].<br />

A passage contradicted by the very same Trismegistus, who is<br />

to say:<br />

made<br />

To speak of God is impossible. For the corporeal cannot express the incorporeal<br />

That which has not any body nor appearance, nor form, nor matter,<br />

cannot be apprehended by sense. I understand, Tatios, I understand, that which<br />

it is impossible to define—that is God.t<br />

The contradiction between the two passages is evident; and this<br />

shows (a) that Hermes was a generic nam de plume used by a series of<br />

generations of Mystics of every shade, and {b)<br />

has to be used before accepting a Fragment as esoteric<br />

that great discernment<br />

teaching only<br />

because it is undeniably ancient. Let us now compare the above with<br />

a like invocation in the Hindu Scriptures—undoubtedly as old, if not<br />

far older. Here it is. Parashara, the Aryan "Hermes," instructs<br />

Maitreya, the Indian Asclepios, and calls upon Vishnu in his triple<br />

hypostasis<br />

Glory to the unchangeable, holy, eternal, supreme Vishnu, of one universal<br />

nature, the mighty over all; to him who is Hiranyagarbha, Hari, and Shankara<br />

[Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva], the creator, the pi-eserver, and destroyer of the world;<br />

to VSsudeva, the liberator (of his worshippers); to him whose essence is both single<br />

and manifold ; who is both subtile and corporeal, indiscrete and discrete ; to Vishnu,<br />

• The Virgin of the World, p. 153.<br />

t Op. cit., pp. 139, 140. Fragments from the "Physical Eclogues" and "Florilegium" of Stobasus.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!