here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$Bethel University Calculus/Precalculus Math Placement Exam ...$

Relative importance of presentation/communication skills to the critic in decision-making : Presentation Preferences: 'Good speaking is often overlooked. Good speakers will gain an edge with me. Those that aren t so refined won t be punished. Teams should focus on key issues. Rebuttals should all present voting issues. The line by line should already have been done in the constructives. MO and LOR should not split duties. A few extra moments here and there don t bother me. 20 seconds would warrant a "Let s get going" from me but I wouldn t punish the team. Speakers can finish their last sentence over time. They should not make a new point. I ll say stop if it gets out of hand but won t punish the team. New arguments in rebuttals should never be made. New positions in the MG and MO aren t terrible as long as its not 5 new positions.' Relative importance of on-case argumentation to the critic in decision-making: Approach to Deciding: 'I focus on comparison. I ll vote on any issue you bring up in the round. Be prepared to explain counterintuitive arguments in greater depth than others. Sensitive issues should be treated with a degree of sensitivity appropriate (abortion nuclear war euthanasia etc.). Openness to critical/performative styles of debating: Go for it! Any additional comments: Myers, Sarah Rocky Mountain College Background of the critic: Theater Tech Professor - Rocky Mountain College - 3 years IE coach for RMC - 2 years Approach of the critic to decision-making (for example, adherence to the trichotomy, stock-issues, policymaker, tabula rasa, etc.): 116
Must be clearly defined by the debaters. Relative importance of presentation/communication skills to the critic in decision-making : Extremely important. I don't have a debate background, so the policy jargon is unfamiliar to me. I don't like speed. I like big picture debate Relative importance of on-case argumentation to the critic in decision-making: Very important - I like the clash of issues and the weighing of arguments Openness to critical/performative styles of debating: I am not familiar with these styles Any additional comments: Neesen, Bill California State University at Long Beach Parli Rounds judged this year: 40+ Non-parli rounds judged this year: College Policy 25+ High School policy 15+ LD (none :) Years judging debate: 15 Years debated: 7 (4 highschool policy/3 College policy) School debated at: Millard South/OCC/CSUFullerton Case Arguments: That is a crazy amount of questions. Here is the simple look way how to debate/construct the case in front of me. Pick what you want to defend, be it policy, fact, or value and defend it. If you do not defend the type of resolution you might lose. I do not care which one you use. I have no problem with performance or traditional debate. Up to you, just defend why your choices are good because the other team may not agree with you. I could care less about the what level the impacts are. Choose one level or have many different levels (I always believe that more is better).I is a dumb arg unless it is all 117
Page 1 and 2:
2008 NPDA National Championship Ju
Page 3 and 4:
Amundsen, Allen Humboldt State Univ
Page 5 and 6:
Anderson, Jared Los RIos Community
Page 7 and 8:
alone is not going to help you win
Page 9 and 10:
Baechtel, Mark Grinnell Clg Backgro
Page 11 and 12:
the flow, but the way you make argu
Page 13 and 14:
Bingham, Paul Western Washington Un
Page 15 and 16:
I’m fine with critiques as long a
Page 17 and 18:
Relative importance of on-case argu
Page 19 and 20:
Brodak, Geoffrey California State U
Page 21 and 22:
Bruce, Kathleen University of the P
Page 23 and 24:
objecting to). This does not meant
Page 25 and 26:
debate but i also think that "trad
Page 27 and 28:
I am open to both critical and perf
Page 29 and 30:
Speeches should be clear and you sh
Page 31 and 32:
Presentation Preferences: presentat
Page 33 and 34:
change. Opposition teams, if you ar
Page 35 and 36:
Coulter, Michael Grove City College
Page 37 and 38:
Cress, Justin Western Kentucky Univ
Page 39 and 40:
personally am getting tired of hear
Page 41 and 42:
C/P’s: Can be either mutually exc
Page 43 and 44:
I have a policy and parliamentary d
Page 45 and 46:
Openness to critical/performative s
Page 47 and 48:
approaching argument in collegiate
Page 49 and 50:
to the speed question is this: if y
Page 51 and 52:
seems that at least mitigating the
Page 53 and 54:
Dreher, Michael Bethel University B
Page 55 and 56:
Drutman, Paul University of Puget S
Page 57 and 58:
Depends on the round. I generally p
Page 59 and 60:
Funkhouser, Eric University of Arka
Page 61 and 62:
debate out. Openness to critical/pe
Page 63 and 64:
Garner, Kevin Texas Tech University
Page 65 and 66: I am NOT tabula rasa. I'm a critica
Page 67 and 68: Grace, Jeremy Rice Univ. Background
Page 69 and 70: Relative importance of presentation
Page 71 and 72: Fiat for politics: I think that fia
Page 73 and 74: See below in “cautionary notes”
Page 75 and 76: speaker points are based on good ar
Page 77 and 78: Unique consideration: I am hearing
Page 79 and 80: I will do my best to vote where the
Page 81 and 82: not believe that there is any type
Page 83 and 84: depending on the argument. But if y
Page 85 and 86: I like straight up substantive on c
Page 87 and 88: Jensen, Kris Hired Critic backgroun
Page 89 and 90: hold critical positions to a very h
Page 91 and 92: Relative importance of on-case argu
Page 93 and 94: I really appreciate a combination o
Page 95 and 96: Jones, Steven Grove City College Ba
Page 97 and 98: Openness to critical/performative s
Page 99 and 100: to be honest, they just bore me a l
Page 103 and 104: Livingston, Ashleigh Point Loma Naz
Page 105 and 106: Martin, JJ Abilene Christian Univer
Page 107 and 108: (3) Disadvantages/counter-plans: Go
Page 109 and 110: I’ve voted on some pretty wacky a
Page 111 and 112: Menapace, Carrie Western Kentucky U
Page 113 and 114: Decision-making: I will do my best
Page 115: Case Arguments: 'Values imply actio
Page 119 and 120: Newkirk, Daniel Biola University B
Page 121 and 122: say I'm tabula rasa, but I'm not su
Page 123 and 124: 8. I do not wish to observe and jud
Page 125 and 126: I react to criticism presented with
Page 127 and 128: kicked by the negative. I rarely bu
Page 129 and 130: Plush, Matt University of Wyoming 4
Page 131 and 132: Approach of the critic to decision-
Page 133 and 134: will not flat drop you for that lan
Page 135 and 136: Disadvantage Arguments: Big DA's wi
Page 137 and 138: Relative importance of on-case argu
Page 139 and 140: Performance debates are just pure t
Page 143 and 144: eason alone I would advise against
Page 145 and 146: should not be topical and should be
Page 147 and 148: Sanberg, Savannah Hired 1.) My crit
Page 149 and 150: Schabot, Daniel Cameron University
Page 151 and 152: etter, more fun, and more education
Page 153 and 154: Strategic issue selection in rebutt
Page 155 and 156: Sietman, Dan Cedarville University
Page 157 and 158: Because I abhor judge intervention,
Page 159 and 160: Being from a predominantly policy d
Page 161 and 162: Relative importance of presentation
Page 163 and 164: The primary thing I look for when j
Page 165 and 166: Soto, Jen Hired Background of the c
Page 167 and 168:
The debaters determine who gets my
Page 169 and 170:
Stutzman, Jacob Truman State Univer
Page 171 and 172:
I’m open to it. Please note that
Page 173 and 174:
I believe that the government team
Page 175 and 176:
Tiongson, Edwin Irvine Valley Colle
Page 177 and 178:
Not a huge fan of such debates, but
Page 179 and 180:
I don't care how fast you go as lon
Page 181 and 182:
Vemuru, Vamsi NPDA Hired Judges Bac
Page 183 and 184:
Communication skills can influence
Page 185 and 186:
If a team wants me to adopt a parti
Page 187 and 188:
Weaver, Scott The Colorado College
Page 189 and 190:
I personally do not care about the
Page 191 and 192:
disrespecting a colleague’s life
Page 193 and 194:
Whitsitt, Travis The Colorado Colle
Page 195 and 196:
T and Theory Arguments: I would say
Page 197 and 198:
the significance of the ballot so t
Page 199 and 200:
Wyman, Jim Moorpark College Backgro
show all

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?