here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University
here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University
here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Coulter, Michael<br />
Grove City <strong>College</strong><br />
Background <strong>of</strong> the critic:<br />
I am new to competitive debate, though I have been affiliated with our own program and<br />
understand the basic issues in a round. For your purposes, I should probably be<br />
considered a lay judge. I am a pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> political science and am well versed in<br />
political philosophy.<br />
Approach <strong>of</strong> the critic to decision-making (for example, ad<strong>here</strong>nce to the trichotomy,<br />
stock-issues, policymaker, tabula rasa, etc.):<br />
My approach to debate has been informed by my understanding <strong>of</strong> the legislative process<br />
and the role <strong>of</strong> civil discourse. Straight-forward policy debates are particularly<br />
appreciated, but I am open to values cases as well. I am looking for clear explanations <strong>of</strong><br />
arguments and very clear analysis on why your team should win the debate.<br />
Relative importance <strong>of</strong> presentation/communication skills to the critic in decision-making<br />
:<br />
Highly technical debate or long excursions on why I should prefer one set <strong>of</strong> rules over<br />
another will not get my ballot. I believe parliamentary debate, perhaps more so than<br />
other formats, should be accessible to a general audience. If I can't follow your<br />
presentation (either because <strong>of</strong> style or because it seems unconnected to the issues at<br />
hand) you will not be rewarded. Persuasion, reasoning, and appeals to real world issues<br />
will be the most effective means <strong>of</strong> securing a win. And try to relax a little bit.<br />
Relative importance <strong>of</strong> on-case argumentation to the critic in decision-making:<br />
Very important. I'm <strong>here</strong> to evaluate positions and policies more than to decide between<br />
different understandings <strong>of</strong> debate itself.<br />
Openness to critical/performative styles <strong>of</strong> debating:<br />
Straightforward, issue-oriented debating stands a much better chance with me than<br />
anything else. You should probably not depend on arguments that would make no sense<br />
in the public square.<br />
Any additional comments:<br />
35