here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

they factor on a subconscious level. While they don't serve as a basis for decisionmaking,
I do have a few preferences: 1) succinct tags for arguments, 2) some slight
pauses when moving to a new position or sheet of paper, 3) clear speaking. I would like
to give your arguments as much consideration as possible and have found that your
argument is more likely to make it onto my flow and into my head if you speak clearly,
pause some, and have succinct tag lines. Also, I don't like it when debaters are rude to
each other.
Relative importance of on-case argumentation to the critic in decision-making:
The relative importance of on-case argumentation is completely dependent on the round.
Openness to critical/performative styles of debating:
I'd like to think I'm open-minded about different approaches to debate. I haven't seen
much performative debate, though, so I'm hesitant to make pronouncements about it. I'm
definitely willing to listen to anything and am happier when there is a justification for
doing what you're doing. I'm fine with critical debate.
Any additional comments:
Moderating my previously reactionary feelings about fairness and ground, I ask only that
debaters measure and weigh claims (and support) about fairness and ground. I find that
many claims about ground and fairness require me to intervene to make decisions
regarding them (I have a hard time determining how much prep time you’ve lost and how
unfair that makes the debate), and I am uncomfortable doing this. Of course, there are
many circumstances where these claims are necessary, and I find myself voting on them
more than I thought I would, but it’s helpful if you can provide ways to evaluate those
arguments fairly. Because I’m more or less a policymaker, arguments about vagueness,
advocacy shift, etc., are more compelling when they also include impacts to decision
making in a policy arena.
I don’t require a point of order to discount new arguments, but you should call the point
of order if you are worried that I might miss it.
Because I learn so much from listening to and judging debates, I don’t like to be very
prescriptive in my judging philosophy. Debaters frequently change my mind about
arguments, types of arguments, and specific issues. I try to be very open-minded about
arguments and debate styles. For the most part, you know what works for you, and I look
forward to hearing it!
58