21.01.2015 Views

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Reverse Voting Issues are for people who cannot debate.<br />

I try not to intervene in rounds. I’m also a critic <strong>of</strong> argument. Those two concepts<br />

conflict quite <strong>of</strong>ten. I wish I could tell you the bright line <strong>of</strong> which arguments are so<br />

terrible that they don’t really need much <strong>of</strong> an answer, and which arguments, while<br />

counterintuitive, still require solid counterarguments. My suggestions: First, try to make<br />

good arguments that have solid foundations. Then you won’t have to worry. Second,<br />

don’t count on me to debate for you. In most cases, I will not intervene. But I think<br />

parliamentary debate should not encourage judges to be 100% tabula rasa. I find debaters<br />

just make stuff up way too <strong>of</strong>ten, both about world events and about debate theory. So,<br />

while I try to give the debaters the benefit <strong>of</strong> the doubt, it is possible that I could<br />

intervene based on false facts or just bad arguments. Perhaps you will be able to tell by<br />

my nonverbal and verbal communication if your argument won’t be getting my ballot.<br />

Granger, Marcus<br />

Carroll <strong>College</strong> <br />

Background <strong>of</strong> the critic: <br />

Name: Marcus Granger <br />

Parli coach at Carroll <strong>College</strong> <br />

Years competing: 8 <br />

Last year competed: 2007 <br />

Years judging: 1 <br />

Background <strong>of</strong> the critic: <br />

4 Years Parli/IEs at Carroll <strong>College</strong>. High school LD x 4 and Congress x 3. <br />

Approach <strong>of</strong> the critic to decision-making (for example, ad<strong>here</strong>nce to the trichotomy, <br />

stock-issues, policymaker, tabula rasa, etc.): <br />

I try to be tab, but I’ll admit that I rarely find myself voting for performance or K. I’m<br />

open to either <strong>of</strong> these, but I have yet to see performance run well in a round I’ve judged. <br />

I wouldn’t punish you for running these arguments, but do so knowing I have a higher <br />

than average threshold. I think you’d prefer that I be honest about this rather than claim <br />

to be fully tab. I’ve routinely voted for poorly run Ks than went dropped by the other <br />

team, and t<strong>here</strong>’s nothing wrong with a good K. Again, the flow takes precedence and <br />

intervention might be the worst <strong>of</strong> all debate sins. <br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!