here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$Bethel University Calculus/Precalculus Math Placement Exam ...$

TABLE OF CONTENTS Amundsen, Allen Anderson, Jared Artime, Mike Badaracco, Gia-Nina Baechtel, Mark Bass, Steven Bates, Marlin Bingham, Paul Blasdel, Joe Bourne, Jay Braz, David Brodak, Geoffrey Bruce, Kathleen Bubb, Nick Buescher, Derek Busho, Robert Calle, Brian Carothers, Blake Carver, Randy Cheesewright, Kyle Church, Kim Cobb, Travis Cole, Becky Corum Billman, Jenny Coulter, Michael Copi, Ryan Cress, Justin Damico, Tony Danielson, Brian Day, Joel Denomie, Dave Dilley, Benita Dirgo, David Doty, Tim Doubledee, Steve Dreher, Michael Drutman, Paul Fiorta, Tim Franke, Melissa Funkhouser, Eric Garcia, Eric Gardner, Kasey Garner, Kevin Glenn, Cathy Grace, Jeremy Graham, Steven Graham, Todd Granger, Marcus Haas, Benjamin Hahner, Leslie Harvey, Korry Helder, Tyson Hoag, Andrew House, Josh Hunt, Jeannie Hunt, Steven Iberri-Shea, Danny Jensen, Kris Joffrion, Chris Johnson, Brooks Johnston Huntington, Terilyn Jones, Alan Jones, Steven Klinger, Geoff Kroeker, Faith Landry, Luke Lane, Gina Lauzon,, Rebekah Liberto, Nickie Livingston, Ashleigh Long, Shelby Jo 3 5 6 8 9 10 12 13 14 16 18 19 21 22 23 26 26 27 28 29 31 32 34 34 35 36 37 38 39 42 44 46 48 49 51 53 55 56 57 59 60 61 63 64 67 68 69 72 74 75 76 78 80 81 83 84 85 87 88 90 92 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 103 104 Martin, JJ 105 Massey, Michelin 105 Masu, David 108 Mavity, Joey 109 Menapace, Carrie 111 Michels, Matt 112 Miller, Greg 112 Moran, Susanna 114 Morton, Ryan 114 Myers, Sarah 116 Neesen, Bill 117 Newkirk, Daniel 119 Nichols, Jason 120 Nishie, Karen 120 Noonan, Thomas 122 Norcross, Brian 123 O'Grady, Brendan 123 O'Leary, Kevin 125 Olsen, Rob 126 Olson, Tiffany 127 Perry, Joelle 128 Plush, Matt 129 Pogge, Paul 129 Poor, John 130 Purcell, Jen 132 Reinstedt, Dane 133 Reynolds, Jessica 134 Roberts, Chris 136 Roberts, Sean 137 Robertson, Kylie 139 Romanelli, David 140 Ross, Scott 141 Rutledge, Skip 143 Safran, Rachel 145 Sanberg, Savannah 147 Scanland, Dave 148 Schabot, Dan 149 Schnoebelen, Jim 150 See, Lindsay 151 Shephard, Kimberly 153 Sietman, Dan 155 Sietman, Rebecca 156 Simas, Libby 158 Simon, Ammon 160 Siver, Christi 162 Soto, Jen 165 Stein, Darryl 165 Straub, Sara 166 Stroup, Kristopher 168 Stutzman, Jacob 169 Swan, Andrew 170 Swift, Crystal Lane 171 Taylor, Kevin 174 Tiongson, Edwin 175 Troyer, Ken 176 Tuttle, Matthew 177 Vanderpool, Tyler 178 Veden, Mary Lynn 179 Vemuru, Vamsi 181 Vertican, Griffith 182 Vradenburgh, Holly 183 Wallace, Eric 184 Walts, Chuck 186 Weaver, Scott 187 West, Tim 188 Whalen, Kristina 189 Whearty, Brandan 190 Whearty, Marquesa 191 Whitsitt, Travis 193 Wilson, Andrew 194 Wonnacott, Mark 195 Woods, Steve 197 Worth, David 198 Wyman, Jim 199 2
Amundsen, Allen Humboldt State University Background of the critic: Currently coaching & judging parliamentary debate for Humboldt State University 2005—present I teach the Introduction to Argumentation course at Humboldt State University (which includes academic debate as a major assignment in the syllabus.) Coached & Judged parliamentary debate as a graduate student (and later as a volunteer coach) for San Francisco State 1998—2002 Competed in parliamentary debate (albeit on a spontaneous basis) as an undergraduate at San Francisco State University for two years. Approach of the critic to decision-making (for example, adherence to the trichotomy, stock-issues, policymaker, tabula rasa, etc.): I am tabula rasa to the core. The Government team must explain to me what I am voting on and establish the weighing mechanism clearly through case, claims, warrants, and reasoning. Since more often than not Government teams are going to link a policy case to the resolution then stock issues are indeed paramount. Likewise, the Opposition needs to do their heavy-lifting and either refute/turn the case or provide fully constructed disadvantages (with links, brinks, and impacts) or a fully constructed counter-plan for me to consider as a viable alternative. Don’t make me work too hard on the flow. Show me where either plan/solvency/advantages outweighs or the terminal impacts from the disads is the most important thing in the round, etc. I will consider procedurals like Topicality only if the violation/ground loss story is fully articulated and argued by the LO. In the case of kritiks, I will also consider them only if the in-round language analysis is fully realized and argued as a legitimate meta-debate on the implications in the round in terms of race, gender, sexuality, etc. Relative importance of presentation/communication skills to the critic in decision-making : I am between the old school parli and the new school parli when it comes to this question. On one hand, I can handle speed; on the other hand, I am annoyed by speed. Basically, if you are going to talk fast, then do so in the name of efficiency (i.e. by using it not as a 3
Page 1: 2008 NPDA National Championship Ju
Page 5 and 6: Anderson, Jared Los RIos Community
Page 7 and 8: alone is not going to help you win
Page 9 and 10: Baechtel, Mark Grinnell Clg Backgro
Page 11 and 12: the flow, but the way you make argu
Page 13 and 14: Bingham, Paul Western Washington Un
Page 15 and 16: I’m fine with critiques as long a
Page 17 and 18: Relative importance of on-case argu
Page 19 and 20: Brodak, Geoffrey California State U
Page 21 and 22: Bruce, Kathleen University of the P
Page 23 and 24: objecting to). This does not meant
Page 25 and 26: debate but i also think that "trad
Page 27 and 28: I am open to both critical and perf
Page 29 and 30: Speeches should be clear and you sh
Page 31 and 32: Presentation Preferences: presentat
Page 33 and 34: change. Opposition teams, if you ar
Page 35 and 36: Coulter, Michael Grove City College
Page 37 and 38: Cress, Justin Western Kentucky Univ
Page 39 and 40: personally am getting tired of hear
Page 41 and 42: C/P’s: Can be either mutually exc
Page 43 and 44: I have a policy and parliamentary d
Page 45 and 46: Openness to critical/performative s
Page 47 and 48: approaching argument in collegiate
Page 49 and 50: to the speed question is this: if y
Page 51 and 52: seems that at least mitigating the
Page 53 and 54:
Dreher, Michael Bethel University B
Page 55 and 56:
Drutman, Paul University of Puget S
Page 57 and 58:
Depends on the round. I generally p
Page 59 and 60:
Funkhouser, Eric University of Arka
Page 61 and 62:
debate out. Openness to critical/pe
Page 63 and 64:
Garner, Kevin Texas Tech University
Page 65 and 66:
I am NOT tabula rasa. I'm a critica
Page 67 and 68:
Grace, Jeremy Rice Univ. Background
Page 69 and 70:
Relative importance of presentation
Page 71 and 72:
Fiat for politics: I think that fia
Page 73 and 74:
See below in “cautionary notes”
Page 75 and 76:
speaker points are based on good ar
Page 77 and 78:
Unique consideration: I am hearing
Page 79 and 80:
I will do my best to vote where the
Page 81 and 82:
not believe that there is any type
Page 83 and 84:
depending on the argument. But if y
Page 85 and 86:
I like straight up substantive on c
Page 87 and 88:
Jensen, Kris Hired Critic backgroun
Page 89 and 90:
hold critical positions to a very h
Page 91 and 92:
Relative importance of on-case argu
Page 93 and 94:
I really appreciate a combination o
Page 95 and 96:
Jones, Steven Grove City College Ba
Page 97 and 98:
Openness to critical/performative s
Page 99 and 100:
to be honest, they just bore me a l
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Livingston, Ashleigh Point Loma Naz
Page 105 and 106:
Martin, JJ Abilene Christian Univer
Page 107 and 108:
(3) Disadvantages/counter-plans: Go
Page 109 and 110:
I’ve voted on some pretty wacky a
Page 111 and 112:
Menapace, Carrie Western Kentucky U
Page 113 and 114:
Decision-making: I will do my best
Page 115 and 116:
Case Arguments: 'Values imply actio
Page 117 and 118:
Must be clearly defined by the deba
Page 119 and 120:
Newkirk, Daniel Biola University B
Page 121 and 122:
say I'm tabula rasa, but I'm not su
Page 123 and 124:
8. I do not wish to observe and jud
Page 125 and 126:
I react to criticism presented with
Page 127 and 128:
kicked by the negative. I rarely bu
Page 129 and 130:
Plush, Matt University of Wyoming 4
Page 131 and 132:
Approach of the critic to decision-
Page 133 and 134:
will not flat drop you for that lan
Page 135 and 136:
Disadvantage Arguments: Big DA's wi
Page 137 and 138:
Relative importance of on-case argu
Page 139 and 140:
Performance debates are just pure t
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
eason alone I would advise against
Page 145 and 146:
should not be topical and should be
Page 147 and 148:
Sanberg, Savannah Hired 1.) My crit
Page 149 and 150:
Schabot, Daniel Cameron University
Page 151 and 152:
etter, more fun, and more education
Page 153 and 154:
Strategic issue selection in rebutt
Page 155 and 156:
Sietman, Dan Cedarville University
Page 157 and 158:
Because I abhor judge intervention,
Page 159 and 160:
Being from a predominantly policy d
Page 161 and 162:
Relative importance of presentation
Page 163 and 164:
The primary thing I look for when j
Page 165 and 166:
Soto, Jen Hired Background of the c
Page 167 and 168:
The debaters determine who gets my
Page 169 and 170:
Stutzman, Jacob Truman State Univer
Page 171 and 172:
I’m open to it. Please note that
Page 173 and 174:
I believe that the government team
Page 175 and 176:
Tiongson, Edwin Irvine Valley Colle
Page 177 and 178:
Not a huge fan of such debates, but
Page 179 and 180:
I don't care how fast you go as lon
Page 181 and 182:
Vemuru, Vamsi NPDA Hired Judges Bac
Page 183 and 184:
Communication skills can influence
Page 185 and 186:
If a team wants me to adopt a parti
Page 187 and 188:
Weaver, Scott The Colorado College
Page 189 and 190:
I personally do not care about the
Page 191 and 192:
disrespecting a colleague’s life
Page 193 and 194:
Whitsitt, Travis The Colorado Colle
Page 195 and 196:
T and Theory Arguments: I would say
Page 197 and 198:
the significance of the ballot so t
Page 199 and 200:
Wyman, Jim Moorpark College Backgro
show all

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?