here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$Bethel University Calculus/Precalculus Math Placement Exam ...$

Taylor, Kevin Carroll College Background of the critic: Name: Kevin Taylor Years competing: 2 H.S. 4 College at Carroll College Last year competed: 2007 Years judging:1 Background of the critic Single White Male from the Suburbs of Denver, CO. Currently working as a corporate recruiter. Likes, movies, sports, camping, river rafting. Dislikes De-dev, Cap-K, Politics DA’s, and Alien-Lizard People from another dimension. No F/C’s. Approach of the critic to decision-making (for example, adherence to the trichotomy, stock-issues, policymaker, tabula rasa, etc.): I like policy but it’s a debate argue what you will, just make sure I get it. Relative importance of presentation/communication skills to the critic in decision-making : If you cannot effectively convey ideas you will fail at life, and lose debates. Speaking well in a speech should be a given. That said I will never drop a team that is technically winning but sounds bad. The flow is ultimately more important. I will just take away speaker points and birthdays, that’s what they are there for. Relative importance of on-case argumentation to the critic in decision-making: Relative to what On-case > nonsensical claims of fancy On-case < debilitating disadvantages Openness to critical/performative styles of debating: If I understand the argument I will write it down on a piece of paper, then I will write down any objections to that argument. Then I will look at what I have written down and decide if I think the argument makes sense…then I will move on to the next argument. Then I will take a nap. Debate is fun, let’s do that. If you are not having fun, it shows. 174
Tiongson, Edwin Irvine Valley College Background of the critic: I'm the Director of Forensics at Irvine Valley College. Although I competed in Parli when it was in it's infancy stages (95-97), I have been coaching the event since 1999. I've been a part of the coaching staff to see the IVC/SOC Parli Debaters win the community college national title at NPDA from 2002-2007. I haven't been to NPDA since it was at Oregon State. Lately I've been coaching all forensics events. I'm typically the coach who gets debaters started and then I would typically hand them off to Gary Rybold (our main debate coach). Regardless, I've judged numrous rounds and I'd consider myself a B/Aparli critic. Approach of the critic to decision-making (for example, adherence to the trichotomy, stock-issues, policymaker, tabula rasa, etc.): I'm more of a stock issues judge. I don't mind the trichotomy arguments. Make them compelling and worthy of my attention. I do believe that policy topics should be policy rounds. I'm open to making a value round into a policy round as long its justified and worthy of my attention. Relative importance of presentation/communication skills to the critic in decision-making : I do enjoy communication skills in a round. Don't go so fast so that I can't understand. Please take into consideration if I have to work too hard to flow the round, you're going to fast. Regardless, humor is a plus and helpful. Relative importance of on-case argumentation to the critic in decision-making: I believe that they should be made. Make sure you don't simply abandon the on-case positions and run suicide T. I believe that offensive is important but still poke the holes in the GOV's case. Openness to critical/performative styles of debating: I'm not a big fan of performance debate. This is only the case because I have yet to see one. I'm not so open to it and I'm not sure how I'd react. It's your debate do what you like but I'm use to watching a non-performance type of a debate. Any additional comments: 175
Page 1 and 2:
2008 NPDA National Championship Ju
Page 3 and 4:
Amundsen, Allen Humboldt State Univ
Page 5 and 6:
Anderson, Jared Los RIos Community
Page 7 and 8:
alone is not going to help you win
Page 9 and 10:
Baechtel, Mark Grinnell Clg Backgro
Page 11 and 12:
the flow, but the way you make argu
Page 13 and 14:
Bingham, Paul Western Washington Un
Page 15 and 16:
I’m fine with critiques as long a
Page 17 and 18:
Relative importance of on-case argu
Page 19 and 20:
Brodak, Geoffrey California State U
Page 21 and 22:
Bruce, Kathleen University of the P
Page 23 and 24:
objecting to). This does not meant
Page 25 and 26:
debate but i also think that "trad
Page 27 and 28:
I am open to both critical and perf
Page 29 and 30:
Speeches should be clear and you sh
Page 31 and 32:
Presentation Preferences: presentat
Page 33 and 34:
change. Opposition teams, if you ar
Page 35 and 36:
Coulter, Michael Grove City College
Page 37 and 38:
Cress, Justin Western Kentucky Univ
Page 39 and 40:
personally am getting tired of hear
Page 41 and 42:
C/P’s: Can be either mutually exc
Page 43 and 44:
I have a policy and parliamentary d
Page 45 and 46:
Openness to critical/performative s
Page 47 and 48:
approaching argument in collegiate
Page 49 and 50:
to the speed question is this: if y
Page 51 and 52:
seems that at least mitigating the
Page 53 and 54:
Dreher, Michael Bethel University B
Page 55 and 56:
Drutman, Paul University of Puget S
Page 57 and 58:
Depends on the round. I generally p
Page 59 and 60:
Funkhouser, Eric University of Arka
Page 61 and 62:
debate out. Openness to critical/pe
Page 63 and 64:
Garner, Kevin Texas Tech University
Page 65 and 66:
I am NOT tabula rasa. I'm a critica
Page 67 and 68:
Grace, Jeremy Rice Univ. Background
Page 69 and 70:
Relative importance of presentation
Page 71 and 72:
Fiat for politics: I think that fia
Page 73 and 74:
See below in “cautionary notes”
Page 75 and 76:
speaker points are based on good ar
Page 77 and 78:
Unique consideration: I am hearing
Page 79 and 80:
I will do my best to vote where the
Page 81 and 82:
not believe that there is any type
Page 83 and 84:
depending on the argument. But if y
Page 85 and 86:
I like straight up substantive on c
Page 87 and 88:
Jensen, Kris Hired Critic backgroun
Page 89 and 90:
hold critical positions to a very h
Page 91 and 92:
Relative importance of on-case argu
Page 93 and 94:
I really appreciate a combination o
Page 95 and 96:
Jones, Steven Grove City College Ba
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
to be honest, they just bore me a l
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Livingston, Ashleigh Point Loma Naz
Page 105 and 106:
Martin, JJ Abilene Christian Univer
Page 107 and 108:
(3) Disadvantages/counter-plans: Go
Page 109 and 110:
I’ve voted on some pretty wacky a
Page 111 and 112:
Menapace, Carrie Western Kentucky U
Page 113 and 114:
Decision-making: I will do my best
Page 115 and 116:
Case Arguments: 'Values imply actio
Page 117 and 118:
Must be clearly defined by the deba
Page 119 and 120:
Newkirk, Daniel Biola University B
Page 121 and 122:
say I'm tabula rasa, but I'm not su
Page 123 and 124: 8. I do not wish to observe and jud
Page 125 and 126: I react to criticism presented with
Page 127 and 128: kicked by the negative. I rarely bu
Page 129 and 130: Plush, Matt University of Wyoming 4
Page 131 and 132: Approach of the critic to decision-
Page 133 and 134: will not flat drop you for that lan
Page 135 and 136: Disadvantage Arguments: Big DA's wi
Page 137 and 138: Relative importance of on-case argu
Page 139 and 140: Performance debates are just pure t
Page 141 and 142: Openness to critical/performative s
Page 143 and 144: eason alone I would advise against
Page 145 and 146: should not be topical and should be
Page 147 and 148: Sanberg, Savannah Hired 1.) My crit
Page 149 and 150: Schabot, Daniel Cameron University
Page 151 and 152: etter, more fun, and more education
Page 153 and 154: Strategic issue selection in rebutt
Page 155 and 156: Sietman, Dan Cedarville University
Page 157 and 158: Because I abhor judge intervention,
Page 159 and 160: Being from a predominantly policy d
Page 161 and 162: Relative importance of presentation
Page 163 and 164: The primary thing I look for when j
Page 165 and 166: Soto, Jen Hired Background of the c
Page 167 and 168: The debaters determine who gets my
Page 169 and 170: Stutzman, Jacob Truman State Univer
Page 171 and 172: I’m open to it. Please note that
Page 173: I believe that the government team
Page 177 and 178: Not a huge fan of such debates, but
Page 179 and 180: I don't care how fast you go as lon
Page 181 and 182: Vemuru, Vamsi NPDA Hired Judges Bac
Page 183 and 184: Communication skills can influence
Page 185 and 186: If a team wants me to adopt a parti
Page 187 and 188: Weaver, Scott The Colorado College
Page 189 and 190: I personally do not care about the
Page 191 and 192: disrespecting a colleague’s life
Page 193 and 194: Whitsitt, Travis The Colorado Colle
Page 195 and 196: T and Theory Arguments: I would say
Page 197 and 198: the significance of the ballot so t
Page 199 and 200: Wyman, Jim Moorpark College Backgro
show all

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?