21.01.2015 Views

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Grace, Jeremy<br />

Rice Univ.<br />

Background <strong>of</strong> the critic:<br />

Judging, coaching, and competing since 1983.<br />

Parli, LD, & IE background.<br />

Approach <strong>of</strong> the critic to decision-making (for example, ad<strong>here</strong>nce to the trichotomy,<br />

stock-issues, policymaker, tabula rasa, etc.):<br />

I attempt to base my decision on how the debaters argue I should decide; I avoid using<br />

my own decision-making philosophy as much as possible but will if the round demands<br />

it, ergo, no one gives me a criteria. T<strong>here</strong> are many cases w<strong>here</strong> this might be necessary:<br />

If asked to use my ballot politically for example, or if both sides fail to give me a clear<br />

mechanism for voting, or if I know something to be factually incorrect (if you are lying).<br />

In these cases I try to stay out <strong>of</strong> the decision as much as I can but I don’t believe in the<br />

idea that any living person is really a blank slate or a sort <strong>of</strong> argument calculator.<br />

No one is tabula rasa. I can think in different ways so policy, fact, or value is fine with<br />

me.<br />

Relative importance <strong>of</strong> presentation/communication skills to the critic in decision-making<br />

:<br />

Speak well and do not be rude. It is more difficult to give you a win if you are not<br />

likeable or pr<strong>of</strong>essional.<br />

Relative importance <strong>of</strong> on-case argumentation to the critic in decision-making:<br />

Weigh the MPX. That being said, this is not a race to count body bags. REALLY! How<br />

will corn subsidies to lead to nuclear war in Iceland Please attempt to avoid making<br />

absolutely ridiculous claims.<br />

The argument’s weight depends on how strong it is. I think line-by-line vs. "big picture"<br />

is an artificial divide anyway. This can vary by round. I would say you need to deal with<br />

all the line-by-line stuff but should not fail to frame things (do the big picture work) for<br />

me as well. It’s pretty rare that I vote on one response but it’s equally rare that I will vote<br />

on the most general level <strong>of</strong> the ideas.<br />

Openness to critical/performative styles <strong>of</strong> debating:<br />

If you "perform" I will judge you on the actual quality <strong>of</strong> the performance. Perform away,<br />

but if you drop all case you will probably lose.<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!