here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University
here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University
here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Grace, Jeremy<br />
Rice Univ.<br />
Background <strong>of</strong> the critic:<br />
Judging, coaching, and competing since 1983.<br />
Parli, LD, & IE background.<br />
Approach <strong>of</strong> the critic to decision-making (for example, ad<strong>here</strong>nce to the trichotomy,<br />
stock-issues, policymaker, tabula rasa, etc.):<br />
I attempt to base my decision on how the debaters argue I should decide; I avoid using<br />
my own decision-making philosophy as much as possible but will if the round demands<br />
it, ergo, no one gives me a criteria. T<strong>here</strong> are many cases w<strong>here</strong> this might be necessary:<br />
If asked to use my ballot politically for example, or if both sides fail to give me a clear<br />
mechanism for voting, or if I know something to be factually incorrect (if you are lying).<br />
In these cases I try to stay out <strong>of</strong> the decision as much as I can but I don’t believe in the<br />
idea that any living person is really a blank slate or a sort <strong>of</strong> argument calculator.<br />
No one is tabula rasa. I can think in different ways so policy, fact, or value is fine with<br />
me.<br />
Relative importance <strong>of</strong> presentation/communication skills to the critic in decision-making<br />
:<br />
Speak well and do not be rude. It is more difficult to give you a win if you are not<br />
likeable or pr<strong>of</strong>essional.<br />
Relative importance <strong>of</strong> on-case argumentation to the critic in decision-making:<br />
Weigh the MPX. That being said, this is not a race to count body bags. REALLY! How<br />
will corn subsidies to lead to nuclear war in Iceland Please attempt to avoid making<br />
absolutely ridiculous claims.<br />
The argument’s weight depends on how strong it is. I think line-by-line vs. "big picture"<br />
is an artificial divide anyway. This can vary by round. I would say you need to deal with<br />
all the line-by-line stuff but should not fail to frame things (do the big picture work) for<br />
me as well. It’s pretty rare that I vote on one response but it’s equally rare that I will vote<br />
on the most general level <strong>of</strong> the ideas.<br />
Openness to critical/performative styles <strong>of</strong> debating:<br />
If you "perform" I will judge you on the actual quality <strong>of</strong> the performance. Perform away,<br />
but if you drop all case you will probably lose.<br />
67