- Page 1 and 2:
2008 NPDA National Championship Ju
- Page 3 and 4:
Amundsen, Allen Humboldt State Univ
- Page 5 and 6:
Anderson, Jared Los RIos Community
- Page 7 and 8:
alone is not going to help you win
- Page 9 and 10:
Baechtel, Mark Grinnell Clg Backgro
- Page 11 and 12:
the flow, but the way you make argu
- Page 13 and 14:
Bingham, Paul Western Washington Un
- Page 15 and 16:
I’m fine with critiques as long a
- Page 17 and 18:
Relative importance of on-case argu
- Page 19 and 20:
Brodak, Geoffrey California State U
- Page 21 and 22:
Bruce, Kathleen University of the P
- Page 23 and 24:
objecting to). This does not meant
- Page 25 and 26:
debate but i also think that "trad
- Page 27 and 28:
I am open to both critical and perf
- Page 29 and 30:
Speeches should be clear and you sh
- Page 31 and 32:
Presentation Preferences: presentat
- Page 33 and 34:
change. Opposition teams, if you ar
- Page 35 and 36:
Coulter, Michael Grove City College
- Page 37 and 38:
Cress, Justin Western Kentucky Univ
- Page 39 and 40:
personally am getting tired of hear
- Page 41 and 42:
C/P’s: Can be either mutually exc
- Page 43 and 44:
I have a policy and parliamentary d
- Page 45 and 46:
Openness to critical/performative s
- Page 47 and 48:
approaching argument in collegiate
- Page 49 and 50:
to the speed question is this: if y
- Page 51 and 52:
seems that at least mitigating the
- Page 53 and 54:
Dreher, Michael Bethel University B
- Page 55 and 56:
Drutman, Paul University of Puget S
- Page 57 and 58:
Depends on the round. I generally p
- Page 59 and 60:
Funkhouser, Eric University of Arka
- Page 61 and 62:
debate out. Openness to critical/pe
- Page 63 and 64:
Garner, Kevin Texas Tech University
- Page 65 and 66:
I am NOT tabula rasa. I'm a critica
- Page 67 and 68:
Grace, Jeremy Rice Univ. Background
- Page 69 and 70:
Relative importance of presentation
- Page 71 and 72:
Fiat for politics: I think that fia
- Page 73 and 74:
See below in “cautionary notes”
- Page 75 and 76:
speaker points are based on good ar
- Page 77 and 78:
Unique consideration: I am hearing
- Page 79 and 80:
I will do my best to vote where the
- Page 81 and 82:
not believe that there is any type
- Page 83 and 84:
depending on the argument. But if y
- Page 85 and 86:
I like straight up substantive on c
- Page 87 and 88:
Jensen, Kris Hired Critic backgroun
- Page 89 and 90:
hold critical positions to a very h
- Page 91 and 92:
Relative importance of on-case argu
- Page 93 and 94:
I really appreciate a combination o
- Page 95 and 96:
Jones, Steven Grove City College Ba
- Page 97 and 98:
Openness to critical/performative s
- Page 99 and 100:
to be honest, they just bore me a l
- Page 101 and 102:
Openness to critical/performative s
- Page 103 and 104:
Livingston, Ashleigh Point Loma Naz
- Page 105 and 106:
Martin, JJ Abilene Christian Univer
- Page 107 and 108:
(3) Disadvantages/counter-plans: Go
- Page 109 and 110:
I’ve voted on some pretty wacky a
- Page 111 and 112:
Menapace, Carrie Western Kentucky U
- Page 113 and 114:
Decision-making: I will do my best
- Page 115 and 116:
Case Arguments: 'Values imply actio
- Page 117 and 118:
Must be clearly defined by the deba
- Page 119 and 120:
Newkirk, Daniel Biola University B
- Page 121 and 122:
say I'm tabula rasa, but I'm not su
- Page 123 and 124:
8. I do not wish to observe and jud
- Page 125 and 126:
I react to criticism presented with
- Page 127 and 128:
kicked by the negative. I rarely bu
- Page 129 and 130:
Plush, Matt University of Wyoming 4
- Page 131 and 132:
Approach of the critic to decision-
- Page 133 and 134: will not flat drop you for that lan
- Page 135 and 136: Disadvantage Arguments: Big DA's wi
- Page 137 and 138: Relative importance of on-case argu
- Page 139 and 140: Performance debates are just pure t
- Page 141 and 142: Openness to critical/performative s
- Page 143 and 144: eason alone I would advise against
- Page 145 and 146: should not be topical and should be
- Page 147 and 148: Sanberg, Savannah Hired 1.) My crit
- Page 149 and 150: Schabot, Daniel Cameron University
- Page 151 and 152: etter, more fun, and more education
- Page 153 and 154: Strategic issue selection in rebutt
- Page 155 and 156: Sietman, Dan Cedarville University
- Page 157 and 158: Because I abhor judge intervention,
- Page 159 and 160: Being from a predominantly policy d
- Page 161 and 162: Relative importance of presentation
- Page 163 and 164: The primary thing I look for when j
- Page 165 and 166: Soto, Jen Hired Background of the c
- Page 167 and 168: The debaters determine who gets my
- Page 169 and 170: Stutzman, Jacob Truman State Univer
- Page 171 and 172: I’m open to it. Please note that
- Page 173 and 174: I believe that the government team
- Page 175 and 176: Tiongson, Edwin Irvine Valley Colle
- Page 177 and 178: Not a huge fan of such debates, but
- Page 179 and 180: I don't care how fast you go as lon
- Page 181 and 182: Vemuru, Vamsi NPDA Hired Judges Bac
- Page 183: Communication skills can influence
- Page 187 and 188: Weaver, Scott The Colorado College
- Page 189 and 190: I personally do not care about the
- Page 191 and 192: disrespecting a colleague’s life
- Page 193 and 194: Whitsitt, Travis The Colorado Colle
- Page 195 and 196: T and Theory Arguments: I would say
- Page 197 and 198: the significance of the ballot so t
- Page 199 and 200: Wyman, Jim Moorpark College Backgro