here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University
here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University
here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Relative importance <strong>of</strong> presentation/communication skills to the critic in decision-making<br />
:<br />
I don’t consider presentation/communication skills in making a decision, although it will<br />
play into my speaker points.<br />
I have no problem with speed as long as you are clear and the other team doesn’t make<br />
arguments to the contrary. I try to keep a fairly comprehensive account <strong>of</strong> the arguments<br />
made in round, and I will be flowing on a laptop, so be sure to hit the line by line, or<br />
gives reasons why you shouldn’t. I haven’t seen many NDT rounds, but I haven’t seen<br />
too many parli debaters that were too fast for me to flow. If you are going too fast for me<br />
I will try to let you know.<br />
Relative importance <strong>of</strong> on-case argumentation to the critic in decision-making:<br />
On case argumentation might matter- it depends on what your <strong>of</strong>f case argumentation is.<br />
If you need it to make it so that your <strong>of</strong>f case disads outweigh, then it matters, if you run<br />
a CP that captures all the case, on case might not matter as well.<br />
Openness to critical/performative styles <strong>of</strong> debating:<br />
I don’t have a priori problems with specific types <strong>of</strong> positions- topical counterlpans,<br />
PICs, politics DAs, kritiks, MPA, etc. But I also recognize that I do have some biases that<br />
I will have to acknowledge at attempt to prevent, so let me explain those.<br />
1. I never really liked kritiks as a debater. Never really ran them too <strong>of</strong>ten, and found<br />
some <strong>of</strong> the kritiks to be mind numbing and pointless. That does not mean I will not vote<br />
for them and I’m sure I’ll find myself voting for them a lot. That just means that you<br />
should be sure to run them well with a good link story, explanation, and alternative. I’m<br />
not familiar with too much critical scholarship, so be sure to do a good job <strong>of</strong> explaining<br />
what they mean. Don’t expect me to fill in any <strong>of</strong> the details. But, if your bread and butter<br />
is a K, by all means run them in front <strong>of</strong> me.<br />
Along the same lines, I never personally liked any <strong>of</strong> the micro political, ironic, or<br />
performance positions out t<strong>here</strong>. That is probably my strongest bias and I hate judging<br />
these kinds <strong>of</strong> rounds with a passion, but I recognize it and will do my best to keep it out<br />
<strong>of</strong> my decision. This will be the hardest for me, but I’ll try to do it.<br />
2. With politics, I am conservative but I will vote for any type <strong>of</strong> argument across the<br />
spectrum and ran many arguments across the spectrum. All this means is that you<br />
shouldn’t run a liberal argument and expect me to automatically buy the assumptions and<br />
161