21.01.2015 Views

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the debate, which means both Members have the responsibility to engage the other side’s<br />

responses rather than just extend their partner’s analysis. Rebuttals should be a<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> the gov and opp philosophies, w<strong>here</strong> they are in conflict, and what<br />

standards should be used to determine which is best.<br />

Flow – Good flowing is key for a good debate because it helps both sides track the<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> arguments. I keep a strict flow and try to protect both sides from new<br />

arguments in rebuttals. That means it is important for you to tell me w<strong>here</strong> you want me<br />

to put your arguments on the flow. I do think that both sides should call points <strong>of</strong> order if<br />

they think the issue is new and could influence the outcome <strong>of</strong> the debate.<br />

Opp Strategy – I do not appreciate splitting the block. Like all theoretical issues – this is<br />

potentially open to debate, but my bias is against it. I can’t see how having the opp go for<br />

12 minutes <strong>of</strong> arguments, and then having the PMR answer those arguments in 5 minutes,<br />

serves the educational purpose <strong>of</strong> debate.<br />

Relative importance <strong>of</strong> presentation/communication skills to the critic in decision-making<br />

:<br />

Performance – Debate is about the oral clash in arguments, and I am more than a<br />

glorified note-taker. Unless room logistics are prohibitive, I prefer that you stand to<br />

speak.<br />

Finally – Courtesy is very important to me in the debate. I like to see a highly charged<br />

debating <strong>of</strong> the arguments, but do not like it when the clash over the arguments translates<br />

into a clash between individuals. Treating each other with respect will keep heads cool<br />

and lead to better arguments in the debate.<br />

Relative importance <strong>of</strong> on-case argumentation to the critic in decision-making:<br />

I like case arguments. See above for more detail.<br />

Openness to critical/performative styles <strong>of</strong> debating:<br />

I think utilizing these kinds <strong>of</strong> strategies comes with a unique set <strong>of</strong> costs and benefits.<br />

While I may have a particular perspective about these strategies, I am open to listening to<br />

them, and will decide based on arguments in the round. All the standards set up above<br />

still apply.<br />

Any additional comments:<br />

All that being said – this is your activity. Play to your strengths and have fun.<br />

164

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!