here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University
here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University
here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
I have not adjudicated before in competition, but in practice have based decisions on the<br />
clarity <strong>of</strong> points and overarching policy concerns.<br />
Relative importance <strong>of</strong> presentation/communication skills to the critic in decision-making<br />
:<br />
I have difficulty flowing speed. I place a high emphasis on clarity <strong>of</strong> presentation and<br />
articulation <strong>of</strong> quality points instead <strong>of</strong> quantity.<br />
Relative importance <strong>of</strong> on-case argumentation to the critic in decision-making: <br />
I think other arguments can be appropriate, but I feel that the greatest emphasis should be <br />
placed on on-case arguments. <br />
Openness to critical/performative styles <strong>of</strong> debating: <br />
Let's not do those. <br />
Any additional comments: <br />
I think logically and can understand points, but debate 'jargon' and excessive speed <br />
present difficulties for me in flowing arguments. Be clear, concise, and emphasize a few<br />
critical points in developing your argument, for I feel that it is difficult to enhance a<br />
strong position around a list <strong>of</strong> unsubstantiated support points.<br />
Poor, John<br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Colorado at Boulder<br />
Background <strong>of</strong> the critic:<br />
John Poor<br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Colorado<br />
Judging Philosophy: NPDA 2008<br />
Debated policy at Whitman for 2 years, 1 year at the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Denver.<br />
Consistent coaching <strong>of</strong> high school policy and LD, as well as college parli.<br />
130