21.01.2015 Views

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

speaker points are based on good arguments<br />

don’t lie<br />

I don’t read the news as much as you might assume<br />

I don’t think capitalism is good, but will vote for it if I have to<br />

I think the <strong>of</strong>fense is key to winning (as opposed to defense, not kindness)<br />

you should think about striking me… seriously<br />

back to kritiks, you should have read the books/authors you talk about<br />

I do not believe in objective truth, but some things are unjustifiable<br />

if you have questions feel free to ask me…<br />

http://toothpastefordinner.com/021308/conspiracy-chart-2008.gif<br />

Hahner, Leslie<br />

Truman State <strong>University</strong><br />

Background <strong>of</strong> the critic:<br />

With over 11 years <strong>of</strong> involvement in competitive debate, I am a well-rounded critic. I<br />

competed in NPDA, and NFA-LD. I coached both these forms <strong>of</strong> debate as well as<br />

policy debate (NDT). In addition to my general knowledge <strong>of</strong> contemporary political and<br />

policy-making concerns, I am well-versed in critical theory and reading strategies.<br />

Approach <strong>of</strong> the critic to decision-making (for example, ad<strong>here</strong>nce to the trichotomy,<br />

stock-issues, policymaker, tabula rasa, etc.):<br />

For the most part, I am a judge who keeps a tight flow, and use that flow to adjudicate the<br />

round. For me, this means the debaters must tell me how to weigh arguments on the<br />

flow. Thus, I will typically take on the judging perspective advocated by the debaters, so<br />

long as that advocacy is persuasive and maintained in round. Should the debaters fail to<br />

make an advocacy, I typically default to policymaker or simply a critic <strong>of</strong> arguments<br />

(who wins what in round).<br />

Relative importance <strong>of</strong> presentation/communication skills to the critic in decision-making<br />

:<br />

Debaters should be able to cleanly and clearly articulate and sustain arguments. The<br />

relative speed and/or style they chose to use in this process, for me, is irrelevant. If you<br />

speak fast, fine. If you sit while you debate, fine. If you chose to stand and speak slowly<br />

in order to make your advocacy, more power to you. But, please, make arguments,<br />

articulate them well, and provide some warrants.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!