21.01.2015 Views

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

change. Opposition teams, if you are able to tear apart the government's postition on<br />

stock issues, you will be much more likely to succeed.<br />

Relative importance <strong>of</strong> presentation/communication skills to the critic in decision-making<br />

:<br />

In rhetoric, presentation plays a big part in whether or not an argument is accepted.<br />

Remember the three pro<strong>of</strong>s as taught by Aristotle, Ethos, Pathos and Logos. Ethos<br />

represents credibility, in which presentation plays a large role. With that in mind, present<br />

complete arguments, and be warned, speed will not help you. I realize most people<br />

believe getting more information out than the other team is an advantage, but if I can not<br />

understand your arguments, they lose their affectiveness...<br />

Relative importance <strong>of</strong> on-case argumentation to the critic in decision-making:<br />

On case argumentation is extremely important. If you rely completely on techniques<br />

such as topicality, resolutionality and kritiks, these only work if I agree with you.<br />

However, if I feel you are running them to take up time, or because that's what you had<br />

prepared in advance, these will not be highly regarded.<br />

Openness to critical/performative styles <strong>of</strong> debating:<br />

Creativity is something I admire, but remember also that credibility is extremely<br />

important. If you try a performance debate, it may help you, or it may reduce your<br />

credibility. If you do it, do it well. Also keep in mind that creativity and novelty is not a<br />

replacement for good rhetoric and argumentation.<br />

Any additional comments:<br />

I love debate, but not what it's becoming. I see a trend in which people rely less upon<br />

good argumentation, and more upon little tricks which their experience tells them will<br />

grant them victory. Good argumentation is about more than just confusing your<br />

opponants and rendering them speechless. I believe the argument in its entirity is<br />

important, and look at which team was most convincing overal.<br />

One last note, while I do look at the flow, and notice when teams drop arguments, it is<br />

extremely rare for me to make a decision based strictly upon the flow. While dropped<br />

arguments can become a problem, the fact that they were dropped is not enough in itself<br />

to grant a victory.<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!