here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

If you love performance I would suggest that you take part in individual events rather
than bashing them.
I have yet to vote on a critique as I do not understand people who declare employ
totalities to critique totalities. The more K's I see the more I begin to believe that far from
being liberating, hyper post modernism is more akin to fascism.
I am not interested in killing people for the good of the Earth.
We are the state, so I will not vote to destroy it.
Please actually know what you are talking about.
Any additional comments:
I will not disclose.
Have fun!
Don't lie.
Graham, Steven
San Joaquin Delta College
Background of the critic:
Steve has two years of forensics experience and has traveled throughout California to a
number of highly competitive tournaments, and he has judges dozens of open rounds of
debate. He also has been a speech teacher for mayn years, and is up to date on current
events and current issues.
Approach of the critic to decision-making (for example, adherence to the trichotomy,
stock-issues, policymaker, tabula rasa, etc.):
Will vote based on how the arguments are best weighed out through impacts in the round.
Stock issues, adherence to the trichotemy etc... are all very important, but if you want to
win the round, show why those are important, and how the otherside does/doesn't uphold
these. Don't focus so much on the lingo, but instead focus on the arguments and how they
are developed to help/hinder your case.
68