21.01.2015 Views

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sietman, Dan<br />

Cedarville <strong>University</strong><br />

Background <strong>of</strong> the critic:<br />

I have never debated competitively nor have I had any formal training in debate per se,<br />

although I did my undergraduate work in Political Comm, and t<strong>here</strong>fore have training in<br />

argumentation, persuasion, etc. I began judging Parli five years ago when my wife was<br />

hired as the Cedarville <strong>University</strong> Debate Coach. As many <strong>of</strong> you can attest, my judging<br />

philosophy has changed considerably over the years.<br />

Approach <strong>of</strong> the critic to decision-making (for example, ad<strong>here</strong>nce to the trichotomy,<br />

stock-issues, policymaker, tabula rasa, etc.):<br />

I believe that Tabula-Rasa is a wonderful ideal, so I will try not to intervene in the round;<br />

however as a human being I believe that it is an unattainable ideal, thus all I can do is<br />

promise to try my best to vote only on that which is said in round. Having said that,<br />

please recognize that I am not an idiot; just because something is said in round does not<br />

mean that I am bound to accept it, regardless <strong>of</strong> whether the other side responds to it. I<br />

believe in Tricot, so I probably won’t buy your Tricot-Bad press. I believe that in most<br />

cases “normal means” covers stock issues adequately.<br />

Relative importance <strong>of</strong> presentation/communication skills to the critic in decision-making<br />

:<br />

I believe that debate is a rhetorical exercise. It is important to me that you present your<br />

arguments clearly such that a total stranger to the debate community could walk into the<br />

room and be able to render a decision. Good delivery enhances your credibility. I have a<br />

few pet peeves:<br />

The Humpback: I dive into my flow, speak until I run out <strong>of</strong> breath, surface for air, and<br />

spray the room with the spittle hanging <strong>of</strong>f my lower lip. (For the love <strong>of</strong> all that is<br />

holy…BREATHE.)<br />

The Demon: T<strong>here</strong> are fast talkers and then t<strong>here</strong>’s SPEED. I can flow quickly, but if I<br />

don’t like your speed, I will stop flowing, and I will adjudicate based on persuasion<br />

alone. Oh yeah, and your speaker points will suck. (Someone call an exorcist.)<br />

The Screamer: I am blissfully ignorant <strong>of</strong> ALL my surroundings, most notably the<br />

acoustics in my room, and I scream at the judge from three feet away. (Someone get me a<br />

cotton ball; my eardrums are bleeding.)<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!