here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University
here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University
here - College of Arts & Sciences - Bethel University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Sietman, Dan<br />
Cedarville <strong>University</strong><br />
Background <strong>of</strong> the critic:<br />
I have never debated competitively nor have I had any formal training in debate per se,<br />
although I did my undergraduate work in Political Comm, and t<strong>here</strong>fore have training in<br />
argumentation, persuasion, etc. I began judging Parli five years ago when my wife was<br />
hired as the Cedarville <strong>University</strong> Debate Coach. As many <strong>of</strong> you can attest, my judging<br />
philosophy has changed considerably over the years.<br />
Approach <strong>of</strong> the critic to decision-making (for example, ad<strong>here</strong>nce to the trichotomy,<br />
stock-issues, policymaker, tabula rasa, etc.):<br />
I believe that Tabula-Rasa is a wonderful ideal, so I will try not to intervene in the round;<br />
however as a human being I believe that it is an unattainable ideal, thus all I can do is<br />
promise to try my best to vote only on that which is said in round. Having said that,<br />
please recognize that I am not an idiot; just because something is said in round does not<br />
mean that I am bound to accept it, regardless <strong>of</strong> whether the other side responds to it. I<br />
believe in Tricot, so I probably won’t buy your Tricot-Bad press. I believe that in most<br />
cases “normal means” covers stock issues adequately.<br />
Relative importance <strong>of</strong> presentation/communication skills to the critic in decision-making<br />
:<br />
I believe that debate is a rhetorical exercise. It is important to me that you present your<br />
arguments clearly such that a total stranger to the debate community could walk into the<br />
room and be able to render a decision. Good delivery enhances your credibility. I have a<br />
few pet peeves:<br />
The Humpback: I dive into my flow, speak until I run out <strong>of</strong> breath, surface for air, and<br />
spray the room with the spittle hanging <strong>of</strong>f my lower lip. (For the love <strong>of</strong> all that is<br />
holy…BREATHE.)<br />
The Demon: T<strong>here</strong> are fast talkers and then t<strong>here</strong>’s SPEED. I can flow quickly, but if I<br />
don’t like your speed, I will stop flowing, and I will adjudicate based on persuasion<br />
alone. Oh yeah, and your speaker points will suck. (Someone call an exorcist.)<br />
The Screamer: I am blissfully ignorant <strong>of</strong> ALL my surroundings, most notably the<br />
acoustics in my room, and I scream at the judge from three feet away. (Someone get me a<br />
cotton ball; my eardrums are bleeding.)<br />
155