15.11.2012 Views

The international economics of resources and resource ... - Index of

The international economics of resources and resource ... - Index of

The international economics of resources and resource ... - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Competences for green development <strong>and</strong> leapfrogging 249<br />

<strong>The</strong> economic rationale for pushing for sustainability innovations in order to<br />

realize export potential is linked to the concepts <strong>of</strong> first mover advantages <strong>and</strong> lead<br />

markets. A first-mover advantage requires that competition is driven not so much by<br />

cost differentials <strong>and</strong> the resulting attractiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>international</strong> production location<br />

alone, but also by quality aspects. Empirical results indicate that under these<br />

conditions, unit labor costs play a lower role in determining exports (Amable <strong>and</strong><br />

Verspagen 1995; Wakelin 1998). Above all for technology-intensive goods, which<br />

include many environmental innovations, high market shares depend on the<br />

innovation ability <strong>of</strong> a national economy <strong>and</strong> its early market presence. Thus, the<br />

argument can be made that if countries push for increasing material efficiency, they<br />

tend to specialize early in the supply <strong>of</strong> the necessary technologies. If there is a<br />

subsequent expansion <strong>of</strong> the <strong>international</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> for these technologies, these<br />

countries are then in a position to dominate <strong>international</strong> competition due to their<br />

early specialization in this field.<br />

<strong>The</strong> following factors have to be taken into account when assessing the potential<br />

<strong>of</strong> countries to become a lead market in a specific technology (Walz 2006):<br />

& Lead market capability: it is not possible to reach a lead-market position for every<br />

good or technology. One prerequisite is that competition is driven not by cost<br />

differentials alone, but also by quality aspects. This prerequisite is fulfilled<br />

especially for knowledge-intensive goods. Other important factors are intensive<br />

user-producer relationships <strong>and</strong> a high level <strong>of</strong> implicit knowledge (Archibugi <strong>and</strong><br />

Michie 1998, Archibugi <strong>and</strong> Pietrobelli 2003; Dosi et al. 1990, Fagerberg 1995).<br />

& <strong>The</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> the dem<strong>and</strong> side is an important part <strong>of</strong> the analysis <strong>of</strong> von<br />

Hippel (1986), Porter <strong>and</strong> van der Linde (1995) or Dosi et al. (1990). Beise<br />

(2004) classifies the dem<strong>and</strong> factors in 5 categories, distinguishing dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

price advantage, market structure, <strong>and</strong> transfer <strong>and</strong> export advantage.<br />

& A lead market situation must also be supported by regulation which at the same<br />

time is innovation-friendly <strong>and</strong> sets the example for other countries to follow the<br />

same regulatory path (Blind et al. 2004; Beise <strong>and</strong> Rennings 2005; Walz 2006,<br />

2007). This relates to different aspects: First, for environmentally friendly<br />

technologies, the dem<strong>and</strong> depends very much on the extent by which regulation<br />

leads to a correction <strong>of</strong> the market failures which consists in the externality <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environmental problems (Rennings 2000). Without such regulation, the dem<strong>and</strong><br />

will be much lower, <strong>and</strong> the various dem<strong>and</strong> effects are less likely to be strong.<br />

Second, the national regulation should not lead to an idiosyncratic innovation, in<br />

other words an innovation that can be only applied under the very specific<br />

national regulatory regime. In contrast, the regulation should be open to diverse<br />

technical solutions, which increase the chance that they fit into the preferences <strong>of</strong><br />

importing countries. Third, the national regulation should set the st<strong>and</strong>ard for the<br />

regulatory regime, which other countries are likely to adopt. Examples for this<br />

are product st<strong>and</strong>ards or testing procedures, which have to be fulfilled before a<br />

technology becomes classified as environmentally benign. If the procedure from<br />

the lead country is adopted in other countries, the national suppliers from the<br />

lead country have additional advantages on the world market, because they have<br />

adapted their technologies early on to pass the requirements <strong>of</strong> such a regulatory<br />

regime, <strong>and</strong> have developed administrative capabilities how to deal with all the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!