The international economics of resources and resource ... - Index of
The international economics of resources and resource ... - Index of
The international economics of resources and resource ... - Index of
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Competences for green development <strong>and</strong> leapfrogging 249<br />
<strong>The</strong> economic rationale for pushing for sustainability innovations in order to<br />
realize export potential is linked to the concepts <strong>of</strong> first mover advantages <strong>and</strong> lead<br />
markets. A first-mover advantage requires that competition is driven not so much by<br />
cost differentials <strong>and</strong> the resulting attractiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>international</strong> production location<br />
alone, but also by quality aspects. Empirical results indicate that under these<br />
conditions, unit labor costs play a lower role in determining exports (Amable <strong>and</strong><br />
Verspagen 1995; Wakelin 1998). Above all for technology-intensive goods, which<br />
include many environmental innovations, high market shares depend on the<br />
innovation ability <strong>of</strong> a national economy <strong>and</strong> its early market presence. Thus, the<br />
argument can be made that if countries push for increasing material efficiency, they<br />
tend to specialize early in the supply <strong>of</strong> the necessary technologies. If there is a<br />
subsequent expansion <strong>of</strong> the <strong>international</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> for these technologies, these<br />
countries are then in a position to dominate <strong>international</strong> competition due to their<br />
early specialization in this field.<br />
<strong>The</strong> following factors have to be taken into account when assessing the potential<br />
<strong>of</strong> countries to become a lead market in a specific technology (Walz 2006):<br />
& Lead market capability: it is not possible to reach a lead-market position for every<br />
good or technology. One prerequisite is that competition is driven not by cost<br />
differentials alone, but also by quality aspects. This prerequisite is fulfilled<br />
especially for knowledge-intensive goods. Other important factors are intensive<br />
user-producer relationships <strong>and</strong> a high level <strong>of</strong> implicit knowledge (Archibugi <strong>and</strong><br />
Michie 1998, Archibugi <strong>and</strong> Pietrobelli 2003; Dosi et al. 1990, Fagerberg 1995).<br />
& <strong>The</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> the dem<strong>and</strong> side is an important part <strong>of</strong> the analysis <strong>of</strong> von<br />
Hippel (1986), Porter <strong>and</strong> van der Linde (1995) or Dosi et al. (1990). Beise<br />
(2004) classifies the dem<strong>and</strong> factors in 5 categories, distinguishing dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
price advantage, market structure, <strong>and</strong> transfer <strong>and</strong> export advantage.<br />
& A lead market situation must also be supported by regulation which at the same<br />
time is innovation-friendly <strong>and</strong> sets the example for other countries to follow the<br />
same regulatory path (Blind et al. 2004; Beise <strong>and</strong> Rennings 2005; Walz 2006,<br />
2007). This relates to different aspects: First, for environmentally friendly<br />
technologies, the dem<strong>and</strong> depends very much on the extent by which regulation<br />
leads to a correction <strong>of</strong> the market failures which consists in the externality <strong>of</strong> the<br />
environmental problems (Rennings 2000). Without such regulation, the dem<strong>and</strong><br />
will be much lower, <strong>and</strong> the various dem<strong>and</strong> effects are less likely to be strong.<br />
Second, the national regulation should not lead to an idiosyncratic innovation, in<br />
other words an innovation that can be only applied under the very specific<br />
national regulatory regime. In contrast, the regulation should be open to diverse<br />
technical solutions, which increase the chance that they fit into the preferences <strong>of</strong><br />
importing countries. Third, the national regulation should set the st<strong>and</strong>ard for the<br />
regulatory regime, which other countries are likely to adopt. Examples for this<br />
are product st<strong>and</strong>ards or testing procedures, which have to be fulfilled before a<br />
technology becomes classified as environmentally benign. If the procedure from<br />
the lead country is adopted in other countries, the national suppliers from the<br />
lead country have additional advantages on the world market, because they have<br />
adapted their technologies early on to pass the requirements <strong>of</strong> such a regulatory<br />
regime, <strong>and</strong> have developed administrative capabilities how to deal with all the