The international economics of resources and resource ... - Index of

More documents

Recommendations

Info

272 P. Ekins COUNTRIES SECTORS SUPPLY CHAIN FIRMS PROCESSES PRODUCTS PROCESSES FUNCTIONALITIES Energy Warmth (space, water) Transport Light Power (for other services) Nutrition Water Flushing Washing Cooking/drinking Shelter Furnishing Tourism Fig. 3 The delivery of functionality in an economy. Source: Huppes et al. 2008, p.53 For example, in the case of transport, the unit of functionality may be (vehicle-km), and the cost to the owner will be the life-cycle cost of acquiring, operating and disposing of the vehicle over the period of ownership. However, it should be borne in mind that many products have multiple functionalities, so that in comparing the functionalities of different products, one must be careful to compare like with like. For example, cars have many functionalities apart from the delivery of vehicle-km (an obvious one is conferring status, or making a social statement), so that it is important when comparing products like cars that they are as similar as possible in terms of other functionalities. The ‘ecoinnovative product or process’ will then be one which delivers greater functionality per unit cost and improves environmental performance. Products and processes are produced or operated by firms. Clearly a firm may have different products and processes, delivering different functionalities, so a complete view of its performance will require some aggregation across these different outputs. Normally this aggregate is expressed in money terms, so that measures of a firm’s performance will often be some measure of economic (money) output compared with economic inputs (e.g. value added, profitability, labour productivity), sometimes compared with other firms (e.g. market share). The ‘ecoinnovative firm’ will then be one which improves its economic performance while also improving its environmental performance. Firms are conventionally grouped into economic sectors, obviously introducing a higher level of aggregation. Many of the measures of sectoral economic performance are the same as for firms and will consist of an aggregate, or average, of the sectors’ firms’ performance. And then sectors are aggregated into national economic statistics. One critical issue in the consideration of economic performance is time. Economies are inherently dynamic, and the consideration of timescale will be Etc. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Depletion, Pollution (air, water, land), Occupation (space, biodiversity)
Eco-innovation for environmental sustainability 273 crucially important to a judgement as to whether or not economic performance has improved. Many new technologies, and new firms, are not ‘economic’ to begin with (i.e. they deliver lower functionality per unit cost than incumbents). There is always a risk in investment that it will not pay off, and different investments pay off, when they do, over different periods of time. In any evaluation of economic performance, the timescale over which the evaluation has been conducted should therefore be made explicit. An example may be renewable energy, and the ‘feed-in’ tariffs which a number of countries have introduced to promote it. At present most such energy is not economic (i.e. it is more expensive per kWh delivered than a non-renewable alternative). That is why it needs the subsidy of a feed-in tariff. In the short term, therefore, it does not deliver enhanced economic performance and therefore, despite its enhanced environmental performance, it is an environmental innovation, rather than an eco-innovation, as the terms are used here. However, this situation may change. Mass deployment of renewable energy technologies through feed-in tariffs may engender learning by doing or economies of scale, reducing unit costs (see Fig. 9 below for PV). The costs of competitors (e.g. the price of fossil fuels) may rise. Other countries may decide to deploy these technologies, generating export markets. All these developments are likely to take time. Provided that economic performance is computed over that time, it may well be that an environmentally-improving new technology (i.e. an environmental innovation) which in the short term was an economic cost actually turns out to deliver enhanced economic performance, and therefore to be an eco-innovation. For any product or process which delivers improved environmental performance, there are therefore three possibilities: ○ It immediately delivers improved economic performance as well (e.g. compact fluorescent light bulbs, some home insulation), in which case it is unequivocally an eco-innovation ○ It does not deliver immediately improved economic performance, in which case it is only a potential eco-innovation which & Becomes an actual eco-innovation when its economic performance improves and it is widely taken up (a process which may take decades or even centuries) & Never becomes an eco-innovation because its economic performance never improves adequately The boundary within which economic performance is considered is also a relevant consideration. For example, although the feed-tariff is currently a net economic cost for the German economy as a whole (because the energy produced is more expensive than non-renewable energy), for the producers of renewable energy it may result in highly profitable businesses. If the boundary of the calculation of ‘economic performance’ is just those businesses, clearly the economic performance picture will be positive. If it is the national economy, and the German renewable energy businesses are focused on the German market, a different picture will emerge, and the overall change in economic performance may be negative. If, again, the German renewable energy industries generate significant exports, this may make their overall effect on the German economy positive.
Page 1 and 2:
Int Econ Econ Policy (2010) 7:147-1
Page 3 and 4:
The international economics of reso
Page 5 and 6:
The international economics of reso
Page 7 and 8:
154 P.J.J. Welfens et al. Keywords
Page 9 and 10:
156 P.J.J. Welfens et al. developme
Page 11 and 12:
158 P.J.J. Welfens et al. In the su
Page 13 and 14:
160 P.J.J. Welfens et al. genuine s
Page 15 and 16:
162 P.J.J. Welfens et al. pt p0 1 p
Page 17 and 18:
164 P.J.J. Welfens et al. A synthet
Page 19 and 20:
166 P.J.J. Welfens et al. ecologica
Page 21 and 22:
168 P.J.J. Welfens et al. 1 0,8 0,6
Page 23 and 24:
170 P.J.J. Welfens et al. In additi
Page 25 and 26:
172 P.J.J. Welfens et al. Fig. 5 Pa
Page 27 and 28:
174 P.J.J. Welfens et al. 1.0 0.5 0
Page 29 and 30:
176 P.J.J. Welfens et al. 2007: 1.0
Page 31 and 32:
178 P.J.J. Welfens et al. weak in t
Page 33 and 34:
180 P.J.J. Welfens et al. Fig. 10 T
Page 35 and 36:
182 P.J.J. Welfens et al. pessimist
Page 37 and 38:
184 P.J.J. Welfens et al. Reference
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Sustainability economics, resource
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
The U.S. proposed carbon tariffs, W
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72: The U.S. proposed carbon tariffs, W
Page 79 and 80: 228 R. Bleischwitz economics and po
Page 81 and 82: 230 R. Bleischwitz Fig. 1 Global re
Page 83 and 84: 232 R. Bleischwitz demand is estima
Page 85 and 86: 234 R. Bleischwitz the ‘socio-ind
Page 87 and 88: 236 R. Bleischwitz Fig. 4 Productiv
Page 89 and 90: 238 R. Bleischwitz 5 Resource produ
Page 91 and 92: 240 R. Bleischwitz The vast majorit
Page 93 and 94: 242 R. Bleischwitz Fig. 6 Resource
Page 95 and 96: 244 R. Bleischwitz Ericsson M (2009
Page 97 and 98: 246 R. Walz 1 Introduction Competen
Page 99 and 100: 248 R. Walz Based on the pollution
Page 101 and 102: 250 R. Walz procedures. However, ev
Page 103 and 104: 252 R. Walz In addition to exports,
Page 105 and 106: 254 R. Walz 4 Technological capabil
Page 107 and 108: 256 R. Walz 4.2 Analysis of patents
Page 109 and 110: 258 R. Walz recycling (e.g. shiftab
Page 111 and 112: 260 R. Walz Fig. 10 Specialization
Page 113 and 114: 262 R. Walz Table 1 Overview of ind
Page 115 and 116: 264 R. Walz questions alone. Clearl
Page 117 and 118: Int Econ Econ Policy (2010) 7:267-2
Page 119 and 120: Eco-innovation for environmental su
Page 121: Eco-innovation for environmental su
Page 143 and 144: The Dutch energy transition approac
Page 169 and 170: Multi-agent modeling of economic in
Page 171 and 172: Multi-agent modeling of economic in
Page 173 and 174:
Multi-agent modeling of economic in
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
344 C. Lutz 1 Introduction This cha
Page 195 and 196:
346 C. Lutz The scenario analysis a
Page 197 and 198:
348 C. Lutz is designed to reduce g
Page 199 and 200:
350 C. Lutz 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 C
Page 201 and 202:
352 C. Lutz Table 2 EU27 productivi
Page 203 and 204:
354 C. Lutz material-intensive to l
Page 205 and 206:
356 C. Lutz Giljum S, Behrens A, Hi
Page 207 and 208:
358 T. Machiba While industries are
Page 209 and 210:
360 T. Machiba Field Target Technol
Page 211 and 212:
362 T. Machiba 3 Understanding sust
Page 213 and 214:
364 T. Machiba The automotive and t
Page 215 and 216:
366 T. Machiba Air conditioners fun
Page 217 and 218:
368 T. Machiba Table 2 Application
Page 219:
370 T. Machiba Charter M, Clark T (
show all

The international economics of resources and resource ... - Index of

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?