15.11.2012 Views

The international economics of resources and resource ... - Index of

The international economics of resources and resource ... - Index of

The international economics of resources and resource ... - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Competences for green development <strong>and</strong> leapfrogging 247<br />

Environmental<br />

pressure<br />

emissions industrialized<br />

countries<br />

emissions catching up<br />

countries<br />

GDP/capita<br />

Within the global environmental debate, it is argued that NICs do not necessarily<br />

have to follow the emissions path <strong>of</strong> the industrialized countries. An alternative<br />

development path can be labeled “tunneling through the EKC” or “leapfrogging”<br />

(Munasinghe 1999; Perkins 2003; Gallagher 2006). It is argued that countries<br />

catching up economically can realize the peak <strong>of</strong> their EKC at a much lower level <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental pressure than the developed countries. Developing countries could<br />

draw on the experience <strong>of</strong> industrialized countries allowing them to leapfrog to the<br />

latest sustainability technology. This leads to a “strategic tunnel” through the EKC.<br />

Here, environmental economists put faith into quick technological development <strong>and</strong><br />

knowledge transfer as a key for reconciling environmental sustainability with<br />

economic development in NICs.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are several critical aspects to this concept (see Ekins 1997 or Dinda 2004<br />

for excellent overviews). First <strong>of</strong> all, the existence <strong>of</strong> an EKC is far from certain.<br />

Even if the data indicates that for some pollutants, e.g. SO2, an EKC exists, it is far<br />

from certain that this holds for global problems such as CO2-emissions or material<br />

use. Furthermore, even if such a development can be seen in the developed world, it<br />

might just reflect a displacement effect <strong>of</strong> dirty industries to other less developed<br />

countries. In addition, even if environmental pressure is declining, it is far from<br />

certain that this results in a sustainable path due to the characteristic <strong>of</strong> many<br />

environmental problems as a stock problem. Finally, there is clear evidence that such<br />

a development does not occur naturally, but requires active policies <strong>and</strong> regulations<br />

<strong>and</strong> an appropriate institutional setting (Dutt 2009).<br />

With regard to transferring the EKC-concept to NICs, two additional critical<br />

questions to this concept have to be addressed:<br />

& First, is the interest <strong>of</strong> the NICs strong enough to push in that direction?<br />

& Second, are the countries—given their stage <strong>of</strong> development—able to absorb the<br />

latest sustainability technologies <strong>and</strong> thus to leapfrog?<br />

tunnel<br />

Fig. 1 Concept <strong>of</strong> tunneling through the Environmental Kuznets Curve<br />

technology <strong>and</strong><br />

knowledge transfer<br />

between countries

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!