The international economics of resources and resource ... - Index of
The international economics of resources and resource ... - Index of
The international economics of resources and resource ... - Index of
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Competences for green development <strong>and</strong> leapfrogging 247<br />
Environmental<br />
pressure<br />
emissions industrialized<br />
countries<br />
emissions catching up<br />
countries<br />
GDP/capita<br />
Within the global environmental debate, it is argued that NICs do not necessarily<br />
have to follow the emissions path <strong>of</strong> the industrialized countries. An alternative<br />
development path can be labeled “tunneling through the EKC” or “leapfrogging”<br />
(Munasinghe 1999; Perkins 2003; Gallagher 2006). It is argued that countries<br />
catching up economically can realize the peak <strong>of</strong> their EKC at a much lower level <strong>of</strong><br />
environmental pressure than the developed countries. Developing countries could<br />
draw on the experience <strong>of</strong> industrialized countries allowing them to leapfrog to the<br />
latest sustainability technology. This leads to a “strategic tunnel” through the EKC.<br />
Here, environmental economists put faith into quick technological development <strong>and</strong><br />
knowledge transfer as a key for reconciling environmental sustainability with<br />
economic development in NICs.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are several critical aspects to this concept (see Ekins 1997 or Dinda 2004<br />
for excellent overviews). First <strong>of</strong> all, the existence <strong>of</strong> an EKC is far from certain.<br />
Even if the data indicates that for some pollutants, e.g. SO2, an EKC exists, it is far<br />
from certain that this holds for global problems such as CO2-emissions or material<br />
use. Furthermore, even if such a development can be seen in the developed world, it<br />
might just reflect a displacement effect <strong>of</strong> dirty industries to other less developed<br />
countries. In addition, even if environmental pressure is declining, it is far from<br />
certain that this results in a sustainable path due to the characteristic <strong>of</strong> many<br />
environmental problems as a stock problem. Finally, there is clear evidence that such<br />
a development does not occur naturally, but requires active policies <strong>and</strong> regulations<br />
<strong>and</strong> an appropriate institutional setting (Dutt 2009).<br />
With regard to transferring the EKC-concept to NICs, two additional critical<br />
questions to this concept have to be addressed:<br />
& First, is the interest <strong>of</strong> the NICs strong enough to push in that direction?<br />
& Second, are the countries—given their stage <strong>of</strong> development—able to absorb the<br />
latest sustainability technologies <strong>and</strong> thus to leapfrog?<br />
tunnel<br />
Fig. 1 Concept <strong>of</strong> tunneling through the Environmental Kuznets Curve<br />
technology <strong>and</strong><br />
knowledge transfer<br />
between countries