synarchy movement of empire book ii - Pierre Beaudry's Galactic ...

... "The congress of Westphalia, on the contrary was, above all, a
diplomatic meeting of warring powers, directly interested, judges and
parties, and, consequently, having no general governmental character other
than the dictatorship of the victorious arms; no judicial character, as to the
rights of peoples, otherwise than the judgment by means of combat fatality.
This last congress was therefore a republican assembly of personal or
feudal powers, hiding behind diplomatic ruse.}" (Saint Yves d'Alveydre,
{Mission des Souverains}, Nord-Sud, Paris, p.243)
For Saint Yves the Peace of Westphalia was what he called the
"{monument of immorality and of iniquity of 1648: the general government
of ruse and force"... "the brutal law of 1648"... "the armed anarchy of the
atheistic and antisocial Republic of powers,"..."The robing of territories by
canon shots was the only possible policy left for European governments
since the fundamental constitution of their relationships, in 1648, and all of
the doctrines and all of the revolutions, including communism and nihilism,
are nothing but its logical conclusions." ..."Since the Treaty of Westphalia,
or rather since the Congres of Arras, the general government of Europe is in
a real state of siege, of which we vainly sense the crushing futility etc.}" So
much for Saint-Yves venting his rage against the Peace of Westphalia. Now
let's examine how he distorts the truth of history.
First, Saint Yves denounces the Peace of Westphalia as a "diplomatic
ruse" and as a subversion of the "synarchist project" that Henry IV and
Elisabeth I had put forward before the rulers of Europe. "{Everybody
knows," wrote Saint Yves, in an flagrant fallacy of historical composition,
"that this project (of Henry IV) would have subordinated the military force
to a legality and the diplomatic ruse to a loyal magistrate: so I will not enter
in all of the details that anyone can find in all of the history books.}" (
{Ibidem. p. 239.)
Here, Saint Yves completely distorts history by making the claim that
Henry IV had been working with Elizabeth, for a period of twelve years, to
establish a grand design of the synarchy. This is not only completely false,
but Saint Yves deliberately ignored that the very explicite policy of Sully
and of Henry IV, for the creation of a {Christian European Republic}, and
with the total support of Elizabeth, was precisely based on the principle of
the {advantage of the other}, which later became the centerpiece of the
Peace of Westphalia, and which Saint Yves does not even mention once.
10