synarchy movement of empire book ii - Pierre Beaudry's Galactic ...

while the emphasis was put on the PERSON. This became the critical form
of corruption that the Dominicans brought into France via German
Existenzphilosophie. Indeed, this was the Dominican way of destroying the
idea of man created in the image of God, and of eliminating, from the
education system, the possibility to discover {UNIVERSAL PHYSICAL
PRINCIPLES}, which pertain to both man and nature. In fact, once you
disassociated the so-called science of nature from a so-called science of
man, there is no longer any UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLES, and the education
system returned to ARISTOTELIAN and CARTESIAN DUALISM, which
were both at the source of fascism. There is no secret to this, the Venetians,
and others, have been using this Aristotelian dualism as a means to
manipulate people for centuries.
HELLMANN has no understanding of this at all and did not see the
axiomatic dimension of the problem. However, he did make a useful
observation. He wrote: "This stirring philosophy, capable of electrifying
culture-Catholics, ex-Catholics, and Catholic converts alike, had set the
Dominicans to employ the serviceable, energetic, and well-connected
Alexander Marc, who could neatly Catholicized this new German
philosophy, as he had Catholicized personalism with 'Otto Newmann.' In
1940, Vichy France's Uriage National Leadership School study group, with
its remarkable chaplains, Rene de Naurois and Jean Maydieu, carried on this
interest in the new German thinking. Yet, a decade later, existentialism was
described as yet another invention of the Resistance and its heroes J. P.
Sartre, Gabriel Marcel, and Albert Camus." (HELLMAN, Communitarian,
p. 105.) It was through these three French authors that existentialism was
first introduced to Baby-boomers in the United States, during the 1960’s.
While the review {PLANS} of the architect, LE CORBUSIER, and
PHILIPPE LAMOUR was more openly fascist, and the review {ESPRIT} of
EMMANUEL MOUNIER and the ORDRE NOUVEAU of ALEXANDER
MARC were more Europeanist and personalist in character, the review
{SEPT} assembled the elite, the crème de la crème, of the French Catholic
Intelligentia of the pre-WWII period, identifying itself officially as a "Third
Way "communitarian experiment" which was "neither Right nor Left". The
collaborators were "savamment choisis" to make a balanced blend between
Neo-Thomist philosophers and New Middle-Ages mystics, that is, a
systematic return to ARISTOTLE, in opposition to PLATO.
160