16.04.2015 Views

synarchy movement of empire book ii - Pierre Beaudry's Galactic ...

synarchy movement of empire book ii - Pierre Beaudry's Galactic ...

synarchy movement of empire book ii - Pierre Beaudry's Galactic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

"The French people's spirit <strong>of</strong> resistance, not Vichy, has prevented the<br />

French Fleet from falling into the hands <strong>of</strong> the Germans. Therefore, the main<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> the United Nations' policy should be to build up the spirit <strong>of</strong> the<br />

French people, not to support Vichy. This spirit is symbolized by the Free<br />

French. Therefore, the French people are disheartened by our distrust <strong>of</strong> and<br />

failure to support the Free French.<br />

"The fact that Hitler 'tolerates' the presence <strong>of</strong> the American Embassy<br />

in Vichy proves that he finds its existence useful.<br />

"Petain would prevent and sabotage any effort towards resuming the<br />

struggle against Germany in North Africa." (Letter <strong>of</strong> Donavan to the<br />

President, February 8, 1942.)<br />

What is coming out <strong>of</strong> this letter, are two things. One is that America<br />

was, in February <strong>of</strong> 1942, preparing to shift its French foreign policy away<br />

from Vichy and toward the Free French, and secondly, the conflicting<br />

positions <strong>of</strong> de Gaulle and Roosevelt had to be maintained firmly until the<br />

Americans were able to launch a successful invasion <strong>of</strong> North Africa. In<br />

other words, each side had to agree to disagree. This was not done out <strong>of</strong><br />

choice or out <strong>of</strong> ideology, but out <strong>of</strong> necessity, and both positions had to<br />

completely disregard public opinion for the higher cause <strong>of</strong> freedom and<br />

sovereignty.<br />

There had been a lot <strong>of</strong> controversy about whether Roosevelt should<br />

have severed American diplomatic relations with the Vichy regime, and<br />

openly supported the anti-fascist Free France forces <strong>of</strong> Charles de Gaulle. A<br />

lot <strong>of</strong> unthinking people made it an ideological question, and defended the<br />

issue naively on that ground. This was a mistake. Demanding a public break<br />

with fascism and an unqualified and complete support for Charles de Gaulle<br />

and the Free French would have been nothing else but a stupid decision to<br />

follow the whims <strong>of</strong> public opinion, and would have jeopardized both the<br />

work <strong>of</strong> the Free French outside and the resistance inside <strong>of</strong> France.<br />

It were better to have the United States support de Gaulle and Free<br />

France in a discrete fashion, through British channels to the Free French<br />

controlled colonies, as Roosevelt did starting in 1941, rather than break<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficially all relationship with Vichy, and risk losing the ability <strong>of</strong> changing<br />

the situation from the inside. There was also a precious source <strong>of</strong><br />

129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!