synarchy movement of empire book ii - Pierre Beaudry's Galactic ...
synarchy movement of empire book ii - Pierre Beaudry's Galactic ...
synarchy movement of empire book ii - Pierre Beaudry's Galactic ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
"The French people's spirit <strong>of</strong> resistance, not Vichy, has prevented the<br />
French Fleet from falling into the hands <strong>of</strong> the Germans. Therefore, the main<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> the United Nations' policy should be to build up the spirit <strong>of</strong> the<br />
French people, not to support Vichy. This spirit is symbolized by the Free<br />
French. Therefore, the French people are disheartened by our distrust <strong>of</strong> and<br />
failure to support the Free French.<br />
"The fact that Hitler 'tolerates' the presence <strong>of</strong> the American Embassy<br />
in Vichy proves that he finds its existence useful.<br />
"Petain would prevent and sabotage any effort towards resuming the<br />
struggle against Germany in North Africa." (Letter <strong>of</strong> Donavan to the<br />
President, February 8, 1942.)<br />
What is coming out <strong>of</strong> this letter, are two things. One is that America<br />
was, in February <strong>of</strong> 1942, preparing to shift its French foreign policy away<br />
from Vichy and toward the Free French, and secondly, the conflicting<br />
positions <strong>of</strong> de Gaulle and Roosevelt had to be maintained firmly until the<br />
Americans were able to launch a successful invasion <strong>of</strong> North Africa. In<br />
other words, each side had to agree to disagree. This was not done out <strong>of</strong><br />
choice or out <strong>of</strong> ideology, but out <strong>of</strong> necessity, and both positions had to<br />
completely disregard public opinion for the higher cause <strong>of</strong> freedom and<br />
sovereignty.<br />
There had been a lot <strong>of</strong> controversy about whether Roosevelt should<br />
have severed American diplomatic relations with the Vichy regime, and<br />
openly supported the anti-fascist Free France forces <strong>of</strong> Charles de Gaulle. A<br />
lot <strong>of</strong> unthinking people made it an ideological question, and defended the<br />
issue naively on that ground. This was a mistake. Demanding a public break<br />
with fascism and an unqualified and complete support for Charles de Gaulle<br />
and the Free French would have been nothing else but a stupid decision to<br />
follow the whims <strong>of</strong> public opinion, and would have jeopardized both the<br />
work <strong>of</strong> the Free French outside and the resistance inside <strong>of</strong> France.<br />
It were better to have the United States support de Gaulle and Free<br />
France in a discrete fashion, through British channels to the Free French<br />
controlled colonies, as Roosevelt did starting in 1941, rather than break<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficially all relationship with Vichy, and risk losing the ability <strong>of</strong> changing<br />
the situation from the inside. There was also a precious source <strong>of</strong><br />
129