synarchy movement of empire book ii - Pierre Beaudry's Galactic ...

7.2 THE HATRED OF PLATO AND OF {AGAPE}.
In his {Mission des souverains}, Saint-Yves explains his total hatred
of Plato and his principle of justice of the Republic, {agape}. He explains
that Plato never understood the real nature of the Republic of Athens whose
ultimate purpose was to guarantee domestic slavery, that is the enslavement
of the majority of the population into agriculture, military and civil slavery.
Only the citizens are free, a freedom which is exclusively guaranteed by
slavery of the great majority, a perpetual and ominous status that could
threaten anyone at any time. To which Saint-Yves adds: "Thus, if Nicetes
had not bought Plato's freedom, this vulgar interpreter of Pythagoras, despite
his metaphysical fantasies on the Republic, should have limited his
republican virtues to the strict practice of his slave duties, under the threat of
the whip, of torture or even of impalement." If this is the kind of justice that
Saint-Yves d'Alveydre had in mind for the great Plato, what kind of justice
does he have in mind for you?
This notwithstanding, since the Republic represented for Saint-Yves
the "pure and unlimited popular will" of its free citizens, this form of
government could not function without a necessary theocratic authority.
Under such conditions, Saint-Yves was forced to conclude: "No true
republic could ever exist under Christianity. The governments of the Italian
cities, of Flanders, of Holland, were republican by name only. Being
representative, in reality, the system of these cities was municipal or
empirocratic, sometimes both together, as are more or less England, the
United States, Switzerland, and as would wish the bourgeoisie of France,
although they would never succeed for reasons that are not useful to reveal
here." (Saint-Yves, {Mission des souverains}, p. 30)
For Saint-Yves d'Alveydre, the Peace of Westphalia was anathema.
He considered this “Code of Nations” as “hypocritical and unreal” because
that Peace established the right to economic and military security of
individual sovereign European nation-states, against establishing a Europe of
cities and regions based on a European constitutional and synarchist legal
system. During the late 1880’s, Saint-Yves d’Alveydre developed this
fallacy of composition by opposing the “loyal magistrature” of Henry IV of
21