synarchy movement of empire book ii - Pierre Beaudry's Galactic ...
synarchy movement of empire book ii - Pierre Beaudry's Galactic ...
synarchy movement of empire book ii - Pierre Beaudry's Galactic ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
in order for them to be cut <strong>of</strong>f from the rest <strong>of</strong> the French Army, and be<br />
captured from the rear. This policy implied, therefore, that the LIGNE<br />
MAGINOT should not be extended to the Sea, but that a gap be left open in<br />
the northern corridor region <strong>of</strong> the ARDENNES Mountains for the invaders<br />
to come through. PETAIN had voted against an appropriation for the<br />
extension <strong>of</strong> the MAGINOT LINE called for by the DALADIER<br />
government, and which was precisely aimed at closing that northern gap.<br />
DALADIER lost the vote.<br />
It is important to note that by the time <strong>of</strong> the last government <strong>of</strong><br />
EDUARD DALADIER, in May 1939, there were no less than six key<br />
synarchist Ministers in control: 1- ALBERT PIERRE SARRAUT, Interior<br />
Minister, 2- RAYMOND PATENOTRE, Minister <strong>of</strong> National Economy and<br />
Production, 3- ANATOLE DE MONZIE, Minister <strong>of</strong> Public Works, 4-<br />
CHARLES POMARET, Minister <strong>of</strong> Labor, 5- RAOUL DAUTRY, Minister<br />
<strong>of</strong> Armament, and 6- CAMILLE CHAUTEMPS, Vice-President <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Council. Five <strong>of</strong> them were from the original C.S.A.R. GROUP OF SIX.<br />
The <strong>synarchy</strong> had, therefore, a total control <strong>of</strong> the DALADIER government<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1939. Moreover, CHAUTEMPS, MONZIE, MARCHANDEAU, and<br />
SARRAUT, had been permanent fixtures inside <strong>of</strong> every French<br />
government, at the exception <strong>of</strong> the LEON BLUM governments, from as<br />
early as the EDOUARD HERRIOT government <strong>of</strong> June 1932.<br />
5.2 GEOPOLITICAL SELECTION OF BATTLE UNITS<br />
According to HUSSON, a political selection <strong>of</strong> troops for the front<br />
lines was the keystone <strong>of</strong> the whole edifice <strong>of</strong> the deliberate defeat. It took a<br />
long time to prepare, from inside <strong>of</strong> the DEUXIEME BUREAU and the<br />
CINQUIEME BUREAU <strong>of</strong> the Army. During the first days <strong>of</strong> the war, in<br />
1939, the DEUXIEME BUREAU was split into two categories <strong>of</strong> services.<br />
The DEUXIEME BUREAU proper had the responsibility for espionage into<br />
military affairs. The CINQUIEME BUREAU was responsible for political<br />
espionage. The general policy adopted by the C.S.A.R. controller<br />
CHAUTEMPS was to use the French defeat for demographic-political ends.<br />
Of all <strong>of</strong> the different forms <strong>of</strong> sabotage, this is the form that hit most<br />
directly to the heart <strong>of</strong> the THIRD REPUBLIC. In fact, this was the most<br />
premeditated and deliberate means <strong>of</strong> purging the country <strong>of</strong> its republican<br />
capabilities, however weak they might have been. It is useful to reflect on<br />
89