16.04.2015 Views

synarchy movement of empire book ii - Pierre Beaudry's Galactic ...

synarchy movement of empire book ii - Pierre Beaudry's Galactic ...

synarchy movement of empire book ii - Pierre Beaudry's Galactic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A the beginning <strong>of</strong> World War I, the military doctrine began to<br />

change within the high command <strong>of</strong> the French Army. The training was<br />

oriented on an all-out <strong>of</strong>fensive, and the synarchists were preaching the<br />

virtues <strong>of</strong> the "Young Turk" policy, which was called the {<strong>of</strong>fensive a<br />

outrance} (constant <strong>of</strong>fensive), a form <strong>of</strong> attack that generally ended with a<br />

bayonet charge. The new military doctrine was based on the insane idea that<br />

{To win you have to advance}, which itself was a carbon copy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

looting policy <strong>of</strong> bankers that said {If you don't gain you lose}. This was<br />

even made popular in the well publicized theory <strong>of</strong> the French philosopher,<br />

Henry Bergson, <strong>of</strong> the {elan vital} that served to prove that the French<br />

soldier was superior to the German soldier, because <strong>of</strong> his {furia francesca}<br />

(French fury) as it was called. The more serious <strong>of</strong>ficer, however, cautioned<br />

against an all-out <strong>of</strong>fensive that could result in too prohibitive loss <strong>of</strong> life,<br />

and the ultimate loss <strong>of</strong> the war.<br />

In the War College at the turn <strong>of</strong> the century, there was a dissenting voice<br />

from an infantry <strong>of</strong>ficer, Colonel Henry Philippe Petain, who was teaching<br />

that the <strong>of</strong>fensive should be decided on the basis <strong>of</strong> the ratio <strong>of</strong> firepower,<br />

largely determined to be three to one. This defensive only policy earned<br />

Petain the reputation <strong>of</strong> being a "defeatist." Petain was commanding the 33 rd<br />

Infantry Regiment, which the young Lieutenant Charles de Gaulle had<br />

served under, after his graduation at Saint-Cyr, in 1912. (The fascist<br />

government that was later established in Vichy, on July 10, 1940, was not<br />

really run by Marshal Petain. It was in reality the beast-man Laval who ran<br />

the government behind the senile and pessimistic octogenarian Marshal. De<br />

Gaulle had nothing but disdain for the treason <strong>of</strong> Laval, and nothing but pity<br />

for the false glory <strong>of</strong> Petain. De Gaulle said <strong>of</strong> Petain that he decided to<br />

sacrifice France out <strong>of</strong> ambition for power. De Gaulle wrote: "Now<br />

suddenly, in the extreme winter <strong>of</strong> his life, events <strong>of</strong>fered to his gifts and to<br />

his pride the occasion - so long awaited! - to bloom again without limits: on<br />

one condition however, that he accept the disaster as the steppingstone to his<br />

elevation and decorate it with his glory." {The Complete War Memoirs <strong>of</strong><br />

Charles de Gaulle}. p.60)<br />

The all-out <strong>of</strong>fensive policy had been advocated, artificially based on<br />

the terrain and revenge policy <strong>of</strong> taking back the territories <strong>of</strong> Alsace and<br />

Lorraine, which had been lost to the Germans in the war <strong>of</strong> 1870. The truth<br />

<strong>of</strong> the matter is that the policy <strong>of</strong> recapturing Alsace and Lorraine was used<br />

as a smoke screen for the traditional imperial French policy <strong>of</strong> the New<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!