Crous et al. Fig. 7. Stenella araguata (syntype material, IMI 34905). A. Leaf spot. B. Conidiophore, conidia <strong>and</strong> verruculose hypha on leaf surface. C–D. Conidiophore with terminal conidiogenous cells. E–G. Ramoconidia <strong>and</strong> conidia. Scale bars = 10 µm. or branched, 20–40 × 3–4 µm. Conidiogenous cells terminal or lateral, unbranched, medium brown, finely verruculose, tapering to slightly or flat-tipped loci, proliferating sympodially, 5–20 × 3–4 µm; scars thickened, darkened <strong>and</strong> refractive. Conidia solitary or catenulate, in simple chains, medium brown, verruculose, subcylindrical to narrowly obclavate, apex obtuse, base bluntly rounded with truncate hilum, straight, 0–3-septate, (7–)13–20(–25) × 3(–3.5) µm; hila thickened, darkened, refractive, 1–1.5 µm wide. Description based on <strong>CBS</strong> 105.75 (Fig. 8): Mycelium consisting of branched, septate, verruculose, medium brown, 2–4 µm wide hyphae. Conidiomata brown, superficial, sporodochial, up to 200 µm diam Conidiophores solitary, erect, micro- to macronematous, 1–12- septate, subcylindrical, straight to geniculate-sinuous or irregularly curved, 10–70 × 3–4 µm; frequently swollen <strong>and</strong> constricted at septa, thick-walled, medium brown, verruculose. Conidiogenous cells terminal <strong>and</strong> intercalary, subcylindrical, straight, but frequently branched laterally, 6–20 × 3–4 µm, with 1–3 flat-tipped loci that can be subdenticulate, 1.5–2 µm wide, somewhat darkened <strong>and</strong> thickened, not prominently refractive. Conidia medium brown, thickwalled, verruculose, septa becoming darkly pigmented, occurring in branched chains. Ramoconidia subcylindrical to narrowly ellipsoid, 12–25 × 3.5–4(–5) µm, 1(–4)-septate. Conidia occurring in short chains (–8), subcylindrical to narrowly ellipsoid, 0–1(–3)-septate, (7–)10–15(–20) × (2–)3–3.5(–4) µm; hila somewhat thickened, darkened but not refractive, 1.5–2(–2.5) µm wide. Cultural characteristics: Colonies on OA erumpent, spreading, with moderate aerial mycelium <strong>and</strong> smooth, even margins; olivaceousgrey (surface); on PDA olivaceous-black (surface), margins feathery, uneven, with moderate aerial mycelium; reverse iron-grey. Colonies reaching 20 mm diam after 1 mo at 25°C in the dark on OA. Specimens examined: Venezuela, Aragua, La Victoria, on leaf spots of Pithecellobium lanceolatum (Mimosaceae), Jan. 1928, H. Sydow, lectotype of S. araguata (selected here!) IMI 15728(a); 3 Feb. 1928, syntype of S. araguata, IMI 34905. Venezuela, isolated from man with tinea nigra, 1973, D. Borelli, holotype of C. castellanii, IMI 183818, culture ex-type <strong>CBS</strong> 105.75. Notes: Stenella araguata is a leaf spot pathogen of Pithecellobium in Venezuela, <strong>and</strong> represents the type species of the <strong>genus</strong> Stenella [Two collections were cited, viz. no. 407, ‘La Victoria’, <strong>and</strong> no. 370, ‘inter La Victoria et Suata’, both without any date, <strong>and</strong> without any specific type indication. Thus, the two collections have to be considered syntypes. <strong>The</strong> two IMI collections with different dates are parts of the syntypes, of which IMI 15728(a) is proposed here to serve as lectotype]. Stenella araguata was incorrectly seen as a species of <strong>Cladosporium</strong> by von Arx (1974), which has recently been morphologically circumscribed (Braun et al. 2003, Schubert et al. 2007b – this volume), <strong>and</strong> is linked to Davidiella teleomorphs. In a study by McGinnis & Padhye (1978), <strong>Cladosporium</strong> castellanii (tinea nigra of human in Venezuela) was shown to be synonymous to Stenella araguata (leaf spots of Pithecellobium lanceolatum in Venezuela). In the present study we re-examined the ex-type strain of C. castellanii (<strong>CBS</strong> 105.75), <strong>and</strong> found conidia to be 0–1(–3)-septate, (7–)10–15(–20) × (2–)3–3.5(–4) µm, while those of the type specimen of S. araguata were <strong>similar</strong>, namely 0–3-septate, (7–)13–20(–25) × 3(–3.5) µm. Furthermore, both collections have verruculose hyphae, which is the primary feature distinguishing Stenella from Passalora Fr. (Crous & Braun 2003). 44
<strong>Cladosporium</strong> <strong>and</strong> morphologically <strong>similar</strong> genera Fig. 8. Stenella araguata (<strong>CBS</strong> 105.75). A–B. Conidiophore fascicles on a pine needle <strong>and</strong> tap-water agar, respectively. C–D, G. Conidiophores giving rise to conidial chains. E–F, H–J. Conidial chains with ramoconidia <strong>and</strong> conidia. Scale bars = 10 µm. Stenella has always been used for anamorphs of Mycosphaerella (Crous et al. 2004, 2006c), <strong>and</strong> the fact that it belongs to Teratosphaeria (Teratosphaeriaceae), <strong>and</strong> not Mycosphaerella (Mycosphaerellaceae), raised the question of how to treat stenellalike anamorphs in Mycosphaerella. Due to insufficient availability of cultures (Crous et al. 2000, 2001), the status of Stenella was left unresolved (Crous & Braun 2003). Presently (Crous & Groenewald, unpubl. data), it is clear that the stenella-like morphology type is polyphyletic within the Mycosphaerellaceae, <strong>and</strong> paraphyletic within the Capnodiales. Several species are known that represent morphological transitions between Stenella <strong>and</strong> Passalora. It seems logical, therefore, that future studies should favour using Passalora to also accommodate Mycosphaerella anamorphs with superficial, verruculose hyphae, which have traditionally been placed in Stenella. This is in spite of the fact that there are other generic names available within the Mycosphaerellaceae for taxa with a stenella-like morphology (pigmented structures, darkened, thickened, refractive scars, <strong>and</strong> superficial, verruculose mycelium), namely Zasmidium Fr. (1849) (see Arzanlou et al. 2007 – this volume), <strong>and</strong> Verrucisporota D.E. Shaw & Alcorn (1993). Based on the phylogenetic position of the type species, Stenella s. str. is an anamorph of Teratosphaeria (Teratosphaeriaceae). Using the generic concept as employed in this volume of the Studies in Mycology, however, the anamorph <strong>genus</strong> is accepted as being poly- <strong>and</strong> paraphyletic within the order Capnodiales. www.studiesinmycology.org 45
- Page 1:
Studies in Mycology 58 (2007) The g
- Page 4 and 5:
Studies in Mycology The Studies in
- Page 7 and 8: CONTENTS P.W. Crous, U. Braun and J
- Page 9 and 10: lectotype for the genus by Clements
- Page 11: Schubert K (2005a). Morphotaxonomic
- Page 14 and 15: Crous et al. Table 1. Isolates for
- Page 16 and 17: Crous et al. Table 1. (Continued).
- Page 18 and 19: Crous et al. 100 10 changes 65 100
- Page 20 and 21: Crous et al. Treatment of phylogene
- Page 22 and 23: Crous et al. Teratosphaeria bellula
- Page 24 and 25: Crous et al. 6. Conidiophores short
- Page 26 and 27: Crous et al. Habit plant pathogenic
- Page 28 and 29: Crous et al. Fig. 7. Catenulostroma
- Page 30 and 31: Crous et al. system, consisting of
- Page 32 and 33: Crous et al. Fig. 9. Penidiella col
- Page 34 and 35: Crous et al. Fig. 12. Penidiella ri
- Page 36 and 37: Crous et al. conidiophores, about 1
- Page 38 and 39: Crous et al. have conidiomata rangi
- Page 40 and 41: Crous et al. Schizothyriaceae clade
- Page 42 and 43: Crous et al. Fig. 21. Stigmidium sc
- Page 44 and 45: Crous et al. Gams W, Verkley GJM, C
- Page 46 and 47: Crous et al. Table 1. Isolates for
- Page 48 and 49: Crous et al. 100 61 100 52 100 10 c
- Page 50 and 51: Crous et al. Fig. 3. Rachicladospor
- Page 52 and 53: Crous et al. Fig. 4. Toxicocladospo
- Page 54 and 55: Crous et al. Fig. 5. Verrucocladosp
- Page 58 and 59: Crous et al. Helotiales, incertae s
- Page 60 and 61: Crous et al. Fig. 10. Ochrocladospo
- Page 62 and 63: Crous et al. Fig. 12. Rhizocladospo
- Page 64 and 65: Crous et al. 7. Conidiophores unbra
- Page 66 and 67: Crous et al. 33. Terminal conidioge
- Page 68 and 69: Crous et al. Crous PW, Kang JC, Bra
- Page 70 and 71: Arzanlou et al. To date 26 species
- Page 72 and 73: Arzanlou et al. Table 1. (Continued
- Page 74 and 75: Arzanlou et al. 10 changes Athelia
- Page 76 and 77: Arzanlou et al. Athelia epiphylla A
- Page 78 and 79: Arzanlou et al. Fig. 3. Periconiell
- Page 80 and 81: Arzanlou et al. Cultural characteri
- Page 82 and 83: Arzanlou et al. Fig. 10. A. Ramichl
- Page 84 and 85: Arzanlou et al. Ramichloridium musa
- Page 86 and 87: Arzanlou et al. Cultural characteri
- Page 88 and 89: Arzanlou et al. Fig. 20. Rhinocladi
- Page 90 and 91: Arzanlou et al. Fig. 22. Rhinocladi
- Page 92 and 93: Arzanlou et al. Rhinocladiella mack
- Page 94 and 95: Arzanlou et al. Fig. 26. Veronaea c
- Page 96 and 97: Arzanlou et al. Cultural characteri
- Page 98 and 99: Arzanlou et al. Fig. 30. Myrmecridi
- Page 100 and 101: Arzanlou et al. Fig. 32. Radulidium
- Page 102 and 103: Arzanlou et al. Fig. 34. Rhodoveron
- Page 104 and 105: Arzanlou et al. even further, thoug
- Page 106 and 107:
available online at www.studiesinmy
- Page 108 and 109:
Dichocladosporium gen. nov. 10 chan
- Page 110 and 111:
Dichocladosporium gen. nov. Fig. 3.
- Page 112 and 113:
Dichocladosporium gen. nov. to intr
- Page 114 and 115:
Dichocladosporium gen. nov. Czechos
- Page 116 and 117:
available online at www.studiesinmy
- Page 118 and 119:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 120 and 121:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 122 and 123:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 124 and 125:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 126 and 127:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 128 and 129:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 130 and 131:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 132 and 133:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 134 and 135:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 136 and 137:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 138 and 139:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 140 and 141:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 142 and 143:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 144 and 145:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 146 and 147:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 148 and 149:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 150 and 151:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 152 and 153:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 154 and 155:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 156 and 157:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 158 and 159:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 160 and 161:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 162 and 163:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 164 and 165:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 166 and 167:
Cladosporium herbarum species compl
- Page 168 and 169:
available online at www.studiesinmy
- Page 170 and 171:
Cladosporium sphaerospermum species
- Page 172 and 173:
Cladosporium sphaerospermum species
- Page 174 and 175:
Cladosporium sphaerospermum species
- Page 176 and 177:
Cladosporium sphaerospermum species
- Page 178 and 179:
Cladosporium sphaerospermum species
- Page 180 and 181:
Cladosporium sphaerospermum species
- Page 182 and 183:
Cladosporium sphaerospermum species
- Page 184 and 185:
Cladosporium sphaerospermum species
- Page 186 and 187:
Cladosporium sphaerospermum species
- Page 188 and 189:
Cladosporium sphaerospermum species
- Page 190 and 191:
Cladosporium sphaerospermum species
- Page 192 and 193:
Cladosporium sphaerospermum species
- Page 194 and 195:
Cladosporium sphaerospermum species
- Page 196 and 197:
Crous et al. The aim of the present
- Page 198 and 199:
Crous et al. 10 changes Athelia epi
- Page 200 and 201:
Crous et al. Table 1. Isolates used
- Page 202 and 203:
Crous et al. Table 1. (Continued).
- Page 204 and 205:
Crous et al. 0.1 expected changes p
- Page 206 and 207:
Crous et al. Fig. 6. Cladophialopho
- Page 208 and 209:
Crous et al. Fig. 11. Cladophialoph
- Page 210 and 211:
Crous et al. Fig. 13. Cladophialoph
- Page 212 and 213:
Crous et al. Fig. 15. Exophiala sp.
- Page 214 and 215:
Crous et al. Fig. 18. Cylindrosympo
- Page 216 and 217:
Crous et al. Fig. 19. Fusicladium a
- Page 218 and 219:
Crous et al. Fig. 22. Fusicladium f
- Page 220 and 221:
Crous et al. Fig. 24. Fusicladium p
- Page 222 and 223:
Crous et al. Fusicladium rhodense C
- Page 224 and 225:
Crous et al. Excluded taxa Polyscyt
- Page 226 and 227:
Crous et al. the conidial tips are
- Page 228 and 229:
available online at www.studiesinmy
- Page 230 and 231:
Cladophialophora carrionii complex
- Page 232 and 233:
Cladophialophora carrionii complex
- Page 234 and 235:
Cladophialophora carrionii complex
- Page 236 and 237:
Cladophialophora carrionii complex
- Page 238 and 239:
Cladophialophora carrionii complex
- Page 240 and 241:
Cladophialophora carrionii complex
- Page 242 and 243:
Cladophialophora carrionii complex
- Page 244 and 245:
available online at www.studiesinmy
- Page 246 and 247:
Hormoconis resinae and morphologica
- Page 248 and 249:
Hormoconis resinae and morphologica
- Page 250 and 251:
Hormoconis resinae and morphologica
- Page 252 and 253:
Fig. 6 Hormoconis resinae and morph
- Page 254 and 255:
Hormoconis resinae and morphologica
- Page 256 and 257:
Cladophialophora, 52 k , 54 k -55,
- Page 258 and 259:
Fusicladium phillyreae, 189 c , 191
- Page 260 and 261:
Ramichloridium epichloës, 60, 89 P
- Page 262:
Trimmatostroma salicis, 3 t , 5, 6