Table5Multidimensional Poverty IndexMultidimensionalPoverty IndexPopulation in multidimensional poverty aHeadcountIntensity ofdeprivationPopulationvulnerableto povertyPopulationin severepovertyContribution of deprivationto overall poverty(%)Year b Value a (%) (thousands) (%) (%) (%) Education HealthPopulation below incomepoverty line(%)PPP $1.25a dayNationalpoverty lineLivingstandards 2002–2011 c 2002–2012 cEstimates based on surveys for 2007–2011Albania 2008/2009 (D) 0.005 1.4 45 37.7 7.4 0.1 32.0 44.9 23.0 0.6 12.4Armenia 2010 (D) 0.001 0.3 6 35.2 3.0 0.0 25.8 64.8 9.4 1.3 35.8Bangladesh 2007 (D) 0.292 57.8 83,207 50.4 21.2 26.2 18.7 34.5 46.8 43.3 31.5Bhutan 2010 (M) 0.119 27.2 198 43.9 17.2 8.5 40.4 21.2 38.4 10.2 23.2Bolivia, Plurinational State of 2008 (D) 0.089 20.5 1,972 43.7 18.7 5.8 19.8 27.5 52.6 15.6 60.1Burkina Faso 2010 (D) 0.535 84.0 13,834 63.7 7.1 65.7 36.2 27.9 35.9 44.6Cambodia 2010 (D) 0.212 45.9 6,415 46.1 21.4 17.0 22.1 32.7 45.1 22.8 30.1Colombia 2010 (D) 0.022 5.4 2,500 40.9 6.4 1.1 31.8 33.5 34.7 8.2 37.2Congo 2009 (D) 0.208 40.6 1,600 51.2 17.7 22.9 10.4 45.6 44.0 54.1 50.1Congo, Democratic Republic of the 2010 (M) 0.392 74.0 48,815 53.0 15.1 45.9 18.0 25.1 56.9 87.7 71.3Dominican Republic 2007 (D) 0.018 4.6 439 39.4 8.6 0.7 39.1 22.6 38.2 2.2 34.4Egypt 2008 (D) 0.024 6.0 4,699 40.7 7.2 1.0 48.1 37.3 14.5 1.7 22.0Ethiopia 2011 (D) 0.564 87.3 72,415 64.6 6.8 71.1 25.9 27.6 46.5 39.0 38.9Ghana 2008 (D) 0.144 31.2 7,258 46.2 21.6 11.4 32.1 19.5 48.4 28.6 28.5Guyana 2009 (D) 0.030 7.7 58 39.2 12.3 1.0 17.4 50.4 32.2 .. ..Indonesia 2007 (D) 0.095 20.8 48,352 45.9 12.2 7.6 15.7 50.6 33.8 18.1 12.5Jordan 2009 (D) 0.008 2.4 145 34.4 1.3 0.1 49.6 47.4 3.1 0.1 13.3Kenya 2008/2009 (D) 0.229 47.8 18,863 48.0 27.4 19.8 12.7 30.1 57.2 43.4 45.9Lesotho 2009 (D) 0.156 35.3 759 44.1 26.7 11.1 21.9 18.9 59.2 43.4 56.6Liberia 2007 (D) 0.485 83.9 3,218 57.7 9.7 57.5 29.7 25.0 45.3 83.8 63.8Madagascar 2008/2009 (D) 0.357 66.9 13,463 53.3 17.9 35.4 34.3 16.7 49.1 81.3 68.7Malawi 2010 (D) 0.334 66.7 9,633 50.1 23.4 31.4 19.5 27.1 53.3 73.9 52.4Maldives 2009 (D) 0.018 5.2 16 35.6 4.8 0.3 13.6 81.1 5.3 .. ..Mauritania 2007 (M) 0.352 d 61.7 d 1,982 d 57.1 d 15.1 d 40.7 d 32.0 21.6 46.5 23.4 42.0Morocco 2007 (N) 0.048 d 10.6 d 3,287 d 45.3 d 12.3 d 3.3 d 35.5 27.5 37.0 2.5 9.0Mozambique 2009 (D) 0.512 79.3 18,127 64.6 9.5 60.7 23.9 36.2 39.9 59.6 54.7Namibia 2006/2007 (D) 0.187 39.6 855 47.2 23.6 14.7 15.1 31.0 53.9 31.9 38.0Nepal 2011 (D) 0.217 44.2 13,242 49.0 17.4 20.8 21.8 33.7 44.4 24.8 25.2Nigeria 2008 (D) 0.310 54.1 83,578 57.3 17.8 33.9 27.0 32.2 40.8 68.0 54.7Pakistan 2006/2007 (D) 0.264 d 49.4 d 81,236 d 53.4 d 11.0 d 27.4 d 30.8 37.9 31.2 21.0 22.3Palestine, State of 2006/2007 (N) 0.005 1.4 52 37.3 8.8 0.1 33.9 55.3 10.8 0.0 21.9Peru 2008 (D) 0.066 15.7 4,422 42.2 14.9 3.9 18.6 20.8 60.6 4.9 31.3Philippines 2008 (D) 0.064 13.4 12,083 47.4 9.1 5.7 15.8 56.5 27.7 18.4 26.5Rwanda 2010 (D) 0.350 69.0 6,900 50.8 19.4 34.7 19.5 30.9 49.6 63.2 44.9Sao Tome and Principe 2008/2009 (D) 0.154 34.5 56 44.7 24.3 10.7 28.8 27.5 43.6 .. 66.2Senegal 2010/2011 (D) 0.439 74.4 7,642 58.9 11.7 50.6 31.8 40.6 27.6 33.5 50.8Sierra Leone 2008 (D) 0.439 77.0 4,321 57.0 13.1 53.2 31.5 19.3 49.2 53.4 66.4South Africa 2008 (N) 0.057 13.4 6,609 42.3 22.2 2.4 7.5 50.5 42.0 13.8 23.0Swaziland 2010 (M) 0.086 20.4 242 41.9 23.1 3.3 16.7 29.9 53.4 40.6 69.2Tanzania, United Republic of 2010 (D) 0.332 65.6 28,552 50.7 21.0 33.4 18.3 26.4 55.3 67.9 33.4Timor-Leste 2009/2010 (D) 0.360 68.1 749 52.9 18.2 38.7 21.3 31.0 47.7 37.4 49.9Ukraine 2007 (D) 0.008 2.2 1,018 35.5 1.0 0.2 4.7 91.1 4.2 0.1 2.9Uganda 2011 (D) 0.367 69.9 24,122 52.5 19.0 31.2 15.6 34.1 50.4 51.5 31.1Vanuatu 2007 (M) 0.129 30.1 67 42.7 33.5 6.5 29.7 17.3 53.0 .. ..Viet Nam 2010/2011 (M) 0.017 4.2 3,690 39.5 7.9 0.7 32.8 25.1 42.1 40.1 28.9Zambia 2007 (D) 0.328 64.2 7,740 51.2 17.2 34.8 17.5 27.9 54.7 68.5 59.3Zimbabwe 2010/2011 (D) 0.172 39.1 4,877 44.0 25.1 11.5 10.2 33.6 56.3 .. 72.0Estimates based on surveys for 2002–2006Argentina 2005 (N) 0.011 f 2.9 f 1,160 f 37.6 f 5.8 f 0.2 f 41.9 12.9 45.2 0.9 ..Azerbaijan 2006 (D) 0.021 5.3 461 39.4 12.5 0.6 24.4 49.4 26.2 0.4 15.8Belarus 2005 (M) 0.000 0.0 0 35.1 0.8 0.0 16.6 61.8 21.7 0.1 5.4Belize 2006 (M) 0.024 5.6 16 42.6 7.6 1.1 22.8 35.8 41.4 .. 33.5Benin 2006 (D) 0.412 71.8 5,652 57.4 13.2 47.2 33.6 25.1 41.3 47.3 39.0Bosnia and Herzegovina 2006 (M) 0.003 0.8 30 37.2 7.0 0.1 29.2 51.8 19.0 0.0 14.0Brazil 2006 (N) 0.011 2.7 5,075 39.3 7.0 0.2 39.0 40.2 20.7 6.1 21.4Burundi 2005 (M) 0.530 84.5 6,128 62.7 12.2 61.9 31.5 22.4 46.1 81.3 66.9Cameroon 2004 (D) 0.287 53.3 9,149 53.9 19.3 30.4 25.7 24.5 49.8 9.6 39.9Chad 2003 (W) 0.344 62.9 5,758 54.7 28.2 44.1 40.9 4.6 54.5 61.9 55.0China 2002 (W) 0.056 12.5 161,675 44.9 6.3 4.5 64.8 9.9 25.2 13.1 2.8Croatia 2003 (W) 0.016 4.4 196 36.3 0.1 0.3 45.0 46.7 8.3 0.1 11.1Czech Republic 2002/2003 (W) 0.010 3.1 316 33.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 99.9 0.1 .. ..160 | <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2013</strong>
<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2013</strong>The Rise of the South <strong>Human</strong> Progress in a Diverse WorldMultidimensionalPoverty IndexPopulation in multidimensional poverty aHeadcountIntensity ofdeprivationPopulationvulnerableto povertyPopulationin severepovertyContribution of deprivationto overall poverty(%)Population below incomepoverty line(%)PPP $1.25a dayNationalpoverty lineYear b Value a (%) (thousands) (%) (%) (%) Education HealthLivingstandards 2002–2011 c 2002–2012 cCôte d’Ivoire 2005 (D) 0.353 61.5 11,083 57.4 15.3 39.3 32.0 38.7 29.3 23.8 42.7Djibouti 2006 (M) 0.139 29.3 241 47.3 16.1 12.5 38.3 24.6 37.1 18.8 ..Ecuador 2003 (W) 0.009 2.2 286 41.6 2.1 0.6 78.6 3.3 18.1 4.6 32.8Estonia 2003 (W) 0.026 7.2 97 36.5 1.3 0.2 91.2 1.2 7.6 0.5 ..Gambia 2005/2006 (M) 0.324 60.4 935 53.6 17.6 35.5 33.5 30.7 35.8 33.6 48.4Georgia 2005 (M) 0.003 0.8 36 35.2 5.3 0.0 23.2 33.8 43.0 15.3 24.7Guatemala 2003 (W) 0.127 d 25.9 d 3,134 d 49.1 d 9.8 d 14.5 d 57.2 10.0 32.8 13.5 51.0Guinea 2005 (D) 0.506 82.5 7,459 61.3 9.3 62.3 35.5 23.0 41.5 43.3 53.0Haiti 2005/2006 (D) 0.299 56.4 5,346 53.0 18.8 32.3 27.0 21.5 51.5 .. ..Honduras 2005/2006 (D) 0.159 32.5 2,281 48.9 22.0 11.3 38.0 18.5 43.6 17.9 60.0Hungary 2003 (W) 0.016 4.6 466 34.3 0.0 0.0 1.8 95.6 2.7 0.2 ..India 2005/2006 (D) 0.283 53.7 612,203 52.7 16.4 28.6 21.8 35.7 42.5 32.7 29.8Iraq 2006 (M) 0.059 14.2 3,996 41.3 14.3 3.1 47.5 32.1 20.4 2.8 22.9Kazakhstan 2006 (M) 0.002 0.6 92 36.9 5.0 0.0 14.6 56.8 28.7 0.1 8.2Kyrgyzstan 2005/2006 (M) 0.019 4.9 249 38.8 9.2 0.9 36.6 36.9 26.4 6.2 33.7Lao People’s Democratic Republic 2006 (M) 0.267 47.2 2,757 56.5 14.1 28.1 33.1 27.9 39.0 33.9 27.6Latvia 2003 (W) 0.006 d 1.6 d 37 d 37.9 d 0.0 d 0.0 d 0.0 88.0 12.0 0.1 5.9Mali 2006 (D) 0.558 86.6 11,771 64.4 7.6 68.4 34.5 26.2 39.3 50.4 47.4Mexico 2006 (N) 0.015 4.0 4,313 38.9 5.8 0.5 38.6 23.9 37.5 1.2 51.3Moldova, Republic of 2005 (D) 0.007 1.9 72 36.7 6.4 0.1 24.7 34.3 41.1 0.4 21.9Mongolia 2005 (M) 0.065 15.8 403 41.0 20.6 3.2 15.4 27.9 56.6 .. 35.2Montenegro 2005/2006 (M) 0.006 1.5 9 41.6 1.9 0.3 37.5 47.6 14.9 0.1 6.6Nicaragua 2006/2007 (D) 0.128 28.0 1,538 45.7 17.4 11.2 27.9 13.6 58.5 11.9 46.2Niger 2006 (D) 0.642 92.4 12,437 69.4 4.0 81.8 35.4 21.5 43.2 43.6 59.5Paraguay 2002/2003 (W) 0.064 13.3 755 48.5 15.0 6.1 35.1 19.0 45.9 7.2 34.7Russian Federation 2003 (W) 0.005 d 1.3 d 1,883 d 38.9 d 0.8 d 0.2 d 84.2 2.5 13.3 0.0 11.1Serbia 2005/2006 (M) 0.003 0.8 79 40.0 3.6 0.1 30.5 40.1 29.4 0.3 9.2Slovakia 2003 (W) 0.000 e 0.0 e 0 e 0.0 e 0.0 e 0.0 e 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 ..Slovenia 2003 (W) 0.000 e 0.0 e 0 e 0.0 e 0.4 e 0.0 e 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 ..Somalia 2006 (M) 0.514 81.2 6,941 63.3 9.5 65.6 34.2 18.6 47.2 .. ..Sri Lanka 2003 (W) 0.021 d 5.3 d 1,027 d 38.7 d 14.4 d 0.6 d 6.3 35.4 58.3 7.0 8.9Suriname 2006 (M) 0.039 8.2 41 47.2 6.7 3.3 36.1 18.8 45.1 .. ..Syrian Arab Republic 2006 (M) 0.021 e 5.5 e 1,041 e 37.5 e 7.1 e 0.5 e 45.4 42.7 11.8 1.7 ..Tajikistan 2005 (M) 0.068 17.1 1,104 40.0 23.0 3.1 18.7 45.0 36.3 6.6 46.7Thailand 2005/2006 (M) 0.006 1.6 1,067 38.5 9.9 0.2 40.7 31.2 28.1 0.4 8.1The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 2005 (M) 0.008 1.9 39 40.9 6.7 0.3 59.9 12.8 27.3 0.0 19.0Togo 2006 (M) 0.284 54.3 3,003 52.4 21.6 28.7 28.3 25.4 46.3 38.7 61.7Trinidad and Tobago 2006 (M) 0.020 5.6 74 35.1 0.4 0.3 1.3 94.3 4.4 .. ..Tunisia 2003 (W) 0.010 d 2.8 d 272 d 37.1 d 4.9 d 0.2 d 25.0 47.3 27.6 1.4 3.8Turkey 2003 (D) 0.028 6.6 4,378 42.0 7.3 1.3 42.3 38.4 19.2 0.0 18.1United Arab Emirates 2003 (W) 0.002 0.6 20 35.3 2.0 0.0 94.4 0.4 5.2 .. ..Uruguay 2002/2003 (W) 0.006 1.7 57 34.7 0.1 0.0 96.0 0.6 3.4 0.2 18.6Uzbekistan 2006 (M) 0.008 2.3 603 36.2 8.1 0.1 23.2 55.7 21.1 .. ..Yemen 2006 (M) 0.283 52.5 11,176 53.9 13.0 31.9 27.0 40.5 32.4 17.5 34.8NOTESa Not all indicators were available for all countries;caution should thus be used in cross-countrycomparisons. Where data are missing, indicatorweights are adjusted to total 100%. For detailson countries missing data, see Alkire and others(2011) and Alkire, Conconi and Roche (2012).b D indicates data are from Demographic andHealth Surveys, M indicates data are fromMultiple Indicator Cluster Surveys, W indicatesdata are from World Health Surveys and Nindicates data are from national surveys.c Data refer to the most recent year availableduring the period specified.d Lower bound estimate.e Upper bound estimate.f Refers to only part of the country.DEFINITIONSMultidimensional Poverty Index: Percentageof the population that is multidimensionally pooradjusted by the intensity of the deprivations. SeeTechnical note 4 at http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_<strong>2013</strong>_EN_TechNotes.pdf for details on howthe Multidimensional Poverty Index is calculated.Multidimensional poverty headcount:Percentage of the population with a weighteddeprivation score of at least 33%.Intensity of deprivation of multidimensionalpoverty: Average percentage of deprivationexperienced by people in multidimensional poverty.Population vulnerable to poverty: Percentage of thepopulation at risk of suffering multiple deprivations—that is, those with a deprivation score of 20%–33%.Population in severe poverty: Percentage of thepopulation in severe multidimensional poverty—thatis, those with a deprivation score of 50% or more.Contribution of deprivation to overall poverty:Percentage of the Multidimensional Poverty Indexattributed to deprivations in each dimension.Population below PPP $1.25 a day: Percentage ofthe population living below the international povertyline $1.25 (in purchasing power parity terms) a day.Population below national poverty line:Percentage of the population living below thenational poverty line, which is the poverty linedeemed appropriate for a country by its authorities.National estimates are based on populationweightedsubgroup estimates from householdsurveys.MAIN DATA SOURCESColumns 1 and 2: Calculated from varioushousehold surveys, including ICF MacroDemographic and Health Surveys, United NationsChildren’s Fund Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveysand World Health Organization World HealthSurveys conducted between 2000 and 2010.Columns 3–10: Calculated based on data onhousehold deprivations in education, health andliving standards from various household surveys aslisted in column 1.Columns 11 and 12: World Bank (2012a).Table 5 Multidimensional Poverty Index | 161
- Page 1 and 2:
WNSEHuman DevelopmentReport 2013The
- Page 3 and 4:
Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 5 and 6:
Human Development Report 2013 TeamD
- Page 7 and 8:
Finally, the Report also calls for
- Page 9 and 10:
Heather Simpson, Ben Slay, Mounir T
- Page 11 and 12:
3.6 India’s Supreme Court issues
- Page 13 and 14:
OverviewOne of the most heartening
- Page 15 and 16:
and sustainability are fully incorp
- Page 17 and 18:
Without investment in people, retur
- Page 19 and 20:
opportunity to reap the full benefi
- Page 21 and 22:
Woods institutions, the United Nati
- Page 23 and 24:
IntroductionWhen developed economie
- Page 25 and 26:
leading economies—Brazil, China a
- Page 27 and 28:
comparable access to information, e
- Page 29 and 30:
mobile phones: cellular banking is
- Page 32 and 33:
“The political problem ofmankind
- Page 34 and 35:
BOX 1.1Fairness, macroeconomics and
- Page 36 and 37:
BOX 1.3Amartya Sen, Nobel Laureate
- Page 38 and 39:
FIGURE 1.1Income per capita is risi
- Page 40 and 41:
BOX 1.4Subjective indicators of wel
- Page 42 and 43:
FIGURE 1.4There is notable variatio
- Page 44 and 45:
FIGURE 1.6Most regions show declini
- Page 46 and 47:
Progress in humandevelopment achiev
- Page 48 and 49:
BOX 1.7Social competencies: human d
- Page 50 and 51:
TABLE 1.3Inequality and satisfactio
- Page 52 and 53:
Not all countries havethe precondit
- Page 54 and 55:
“When the music changes,so does t
- Page 56 and 57:
BOX 2.1The South’s integration wi
- Page 58 and 59:
FIGURE 2.1As a share of world merch
- Page 60 and 61:
BOX 2.2Acquisitions by the South of
- Page 62 and 63:
FIGURE 2.3Between 2000 and 2010, In
- Page 64 and 65:
FIGURE 2.4Export earnings per capit
- Page 66 and 67:
BOX 2.6Final assembly is about more
- Page 68 and 69:
Instead of having a centreof indust
- Page 70 and 71:
FIGURE 2.6Emerging market economies
- Page 72 and 73:
Developing countriestrade more amon
- Page 74 and 75:
“We cannot expect thatall nations
- Page 76 and 77:
TABLE 3.1Selected developing countr
- Page 78 and 79:
A common featureof countries thatha
- Page 80 and 81:
More important thangetting prices r
- Page 82 and 83:
BOX 3.5Eastern Europe and Central A
- Page 84 and 85:
States have to beconscious that the
- Page 86 and 87:
As countries develop,they tend to d
- Page 88 and 89:
Having weathered theAsian financial
- Page 90 and 91:
Providing publicservices that contr
- Page 92 and 93:
Advancing health requiresmore than
- Page 94 and 95:
Universal public healthand educatio
- Page 96 and 97:
• China. The Minimum Livelihood G
- Page 98 and 99:
“Each generation will reap whatth
- Page 100 and 101:
concerns will make for a complex en
- Page 102 and 103:
A greater emphasison education cans
- Page 104 and 105:
FIGURE 4.1Under the fast track scen
- Page 106 and 107:
Around the worldpeople are calling
- Page 108 and 109:
FIGURE 4.4Different environmental s
- Page 110 and 111:
FIGURE 4.5Education policies can al
- Page 112 and 113:
BOX 4.2China and Ghana: who benefit
- Page 114 and 115:
FIGURE 4.8countries thus converge t
- Page 116 and 117:
“Let us join hands to try tocreat
- Page 118 and 119:
Areas of globalinternational concer
- Page 120 and 121:
Addressing climatechange requires t
- Page 122 and 123: International governanceis increasi
- Page 124 and 125: BOX 5.2Jo Leinen, Member of the Eur
- Page 126 and 127: facilitates reserve investments and
- Page 128 and 129: Responsible sovereigntytakes the lo
- Page 130 and 131: FIGURE 5.1Under the accelerated pro
- Page 132 and 133: Good policymakingrequires greater f
- Page 134 and 135: A fair and less unequalworld requir
- Page 137 and 138: NotesOverview1 Atsmon and others 20
- Page 139 and 140: 25 Blinder 2006.26 UNIDO 2009.27 UN
- Page 141 and 142: which is 61.7 deaths per 1,000 live
- Page 143 and 144: ReferencesAbdurazakov, A., A. Minsa
- Page 145 and 146: urban_world_cities_and_the_rise_of_
- Page 147 and 148: Kamau, P., D. McCormick, and N. Pin
- Page 149 and 150: Labor Administration. Geneva: Inter
- Page 151 and 152: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 153 and 154: Statistical acknowledgementsThe Rep
- Page 155 and 156: Key to HDI countries and ranks, 201
- Page 157 and 158: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 159 and 160: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 161 and 162: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 163 and 164: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 165 and 166: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 167 and 168: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 169 and 170: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 171: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 175 and 176: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 177 and 178: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 179 and 180: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 181 and 182: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 183 and 184: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 185 and 186: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 187 and 188: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 189 and 190: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 191 and 192: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 193 and 194: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 195 and 196: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 197 and 198: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 199 and 200: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 201 and 202: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 203 and 204: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 205 and 206: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 207 and 208: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 209 and 210: Human Development Report 2013The Ri
- Page 211 and 212: Statistical referencesADB (Asian De
- Page 213 and 214: Core features of the model pertinen
- Page 215 and 216: Countries and HDI ranks in 2012 and