Despite some attempts to curb <strong>urban</strong> sprawl, such as the creation of a strategic <strong>and</strong>regulatory planning system ‘to protect prime growing areas from relentless <strong>urban</strong>sprawl’ by the Melbourne Metropolitan Board of Works in the early 1950s (Budge,2009: 5-6), or the designation of the ‘green wedge’ zones on Melbourne’s boundariesby the government of Premier Dick Hamer in the late 1970s, the reality was, <strong>and</strong> still is,that farmers <strong>and</strong> market gardeners were slowly pushed further out to the fringes of thecity <strong>and</strong> beyond. As has occurred with other major cities on Australian’s easternseaboard, Melbourne’s farml<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>urban</strong> orchards have over time been absorbedwithin the city’s boundaries <strong>and</strong> built upon. The l<strong>and</strong> has been given over to other uses– residential, commercial <strong>and</strong> industrial – <strong>and</strong> the <strong>urban</strong> farmers <strong>and</strong> growers havebeen forced to move further out to the fringes of the exp<strong>and</strong>ing city, or have given upthis occupation.Continuing the process of <strong>urban</strong> expansion, the remaining peri-<strong>urban</strong> farml<strong>and</strong> areas ofMelbourne are still under threat through recent expansions to the <strong>Urban</strong> GrowthBoundary (UGB), which has now been revised four times since its introduction in 2002.The recent revision in August 2010 included 5000 hectares in the south-east growthcorridor, the majority of which was prime market garden l<strong>and</strong> in the Casey-Cardiniashires. Many of these councils have attempted to resist this <strong>urban</strong> encroachment intothe market garden areas on the grounds that it undermines ‘their last remainingindustry’. They have asked, unsuccessfully, the current Victorian government toreverse some or all of the 2010 decision, by excising market garden l<strong>and</strong> in the Clyderegion.Under this scenario, it seems that local <strong>food</strong> production in Melbourne is under threat<strong>and</strong> this could well compromise the <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> of the city. However, Melbourne stillholds vast areas of l<strong>and</strong>, both in inner <strong>and</strong> peri <strong>urban</strong> regions, where <strong>food</strong> production,processing, distribution <strong>and</strong> recycling could take place. <strong>Urban</strong> agriculture has a lot tooffer in terms of <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> to Melbournians. Roofs, ver<strong>and</strong>as, alleys, avenues <strong>and</strong>parks could provide significant areas for <strong>urban</strong> agriculture to flourish <strong>and</strong> consequentlyimprove Melbourne’s <strong>resilience</strong> to <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>, while strengthening community spirit<strong>and</strong> fostering education.The Gold Coast is a coastal city situated in South East Queensl<strong>and</strong>. It is the sixth mostpopulous city in Australia, <strong>and</strong> the second largest local government area. One of thefastest growing cities in Australia, with a current population of around 500,000 people,it is projected to exceed 780,000 by 2031 (PIFU, 2008).The history of the Gold Coast began in the late 1880s when agriculture wasbrought to the hinterl<strong>and</strong> region <strong>and</strong> a string of coastal holiday villages quicklyemerged. The Gold Coast region grew significantly after the 1920s with theestablishment of tourism facilities such as the Surfers Paradise Hotel, <strong>and</strong> theestablishment of the coast as an ‘R&R’ venue for Australian <strong>and</strong> Allied armedforces during World War II. The city further developed with the tourism booms ofthe 1950s <strong>and</strong> 80s to become one of Australia’s top tourist destinations. (GCCC,http://heritage.goldcoast.qld.gov.au/Histories).Unlike Melbourne, <strong>and</strong> despite this fast pace of growth, the city still has just under halfof its footprint (63,678 hectares) covered in native vegetation <strong>and</strong> the built environment<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 103
occupies less that 50% of the city. The Gold Coast also experiences a subtropical<strong>climate</strong>, with relatively mild winters <strong>and</strong> humid summers <strong>and</strong>, although rainfall is moreprevalent during the hotter months, the city enjoys precipitation all year round. Theseclimatic qualities coupled with the opportunities offered by large areas of open spacesmake the Gold Coast one of Australia’s potential hot spots for <strong>urban</strong> agriculture toflourish <strong>and</strong> become a significant part of the <strong>urban</strong> fabric.2 MethodologyThis project was designed to extend our knowledge of the social, economic <strong>and</strong>political context for <strong>urban</strong> agriculture in Australia <strong>and</strong> to explore the potential forextending its practice in the future. It comprised three main elements:1. A systematic review of existing studies of <strong>urban</strong> agriculture in Australia <strong>and</strong>elsewhere, including any studies of the barriers to its extension <strong>and</strong> of the likelyimpact of <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> on the patterns <strong>and</strong> viability of various <strong>urban</strong>agricultural practices in Australian cities.2. Case study research in two Australian cities (Melbourne <strong>and</strong> Gold Coast)exploring the range of <strong>urban</strong> agriculture practices, including an assessment ofits current <strong>and</strong> future contribution to <strong>urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> in each locality. Eachcase study involves the collection <strong>and</strong> analysis of relevant policy material, localstudies <strong>and</strong> a series of one-to-one interviews with key local stakeholders,including researchers, policy makers <strong>and</strong> practitioners from local <strong>and</strong> Stategovernments. Melbourne & the Gold Coast were selected because of theirinnovations in <strong>urban</strong> agriculture & the opportunity to use existing open space innew ways.3. An assessment of the extent to which local <strong>urban</strong> agriculture <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>strategies make a positive contribution to local <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> adaptationstrategies.We describe the case study element in more detail below.2.1 Case study researchCase study research is commonly used to explore in detail aspects of a particular casethat are not amenable to large scale, extensive research methods such as surveys.While not tied to any particular method of data collection <strong>and</strong> analysis, case studiesoften combine quantitative <strong>and</strong> qualitative or extensive <strong>and</strong> intensive techniques toexplore cases in great detail, providing what is often referred to as ‘rich-thick’descriptions (Lincoln <strong>and</strong> Guba, 1985).Case studies should also be clear cases of something of theoretical significance to thestudy in question. In this case the case studies are of two Australian cities with ratherdifferent <strong>urban</strong> trajectories <strong>and</strong> profiles of <strong>urban</strong> agriculture. Melbourne was declared acity in 1847 (twelve years after its founding) <strong>and</strong> is now the second largest city inAustralia in terms of its metropolitan area, governed by 26 city <strong>and</strong> five shire councils.The City of the Gold Coast was approved by the Queensl<strong>and</strong> state government as thename of the local authority in 1959 <strong>and</strong> the city is now the sixth largest in the country,while the local authority is the second largest after Brisbane. While Melbourne has along tradition of meeting many of its <strong>food</strong> needs from within its immediate hinterl<strong>and</strong>,<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 104
- Page 1 and 2:
Synthesis and Integrative ResearchF
- Page 3 and 4:
Published by the National Climate C
- Page 5 and 6:
ABSTRACTFood security is increasing
- Page 7 and 8:
1. a review of the literature: on n
- Page 9 and 10:
its Food for All project. This help
- Page 13 and 14:
In response to the existential thre
- Page 15 and 16:
2. OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCHFood i
- Page 17 and 18:
debates and to the more systematic
- Page 19 and 20:
organisation in the past few years.
- Page 21 and 22:
4. RESULTSIn this section we presen
- Page 23 and 24:
increasing productivity. Thus, whil
- Page 25 and 26:
people and the origins of their foo
- Page 27 and 28:
urban food supply chains. Thus, whi
- Page 29 and 30:
This logistics system is dominated
- Page 31 and 32:
Like Hodgson et al., as per definit
- Page 33 and 34:
esilient, powerful by being locally
- Page 35 and 36:
volume or even its contribution to
- Page 37:
community food growing can have on
- Page 40 and 41:
generations this history has been f
- Page 42 and 43:
a stronger focus on addressing the
- Page 44 and 45:
The third key aspect is fairness -
- Page 46 and 47:
climate (which we live and work in
- Page 48 and 49:
agriculture. Eight percent is in ur
- Page 50 and 51:
This concept of the ‘spaces in be
- Page 52 and 53:
esearch scientist and chair of the
- Page 54 and 55:
As discussed above, protection of t
- Page 56:
4.2.5 What is the extent and the im
- Page 60 and 61:
no place under the panoply of pract
- Page 62 and 63: increased, the market dominance of
- Page 64 and 65: … the residents of S Park called
- Page 66 and 67: 5. CONCLUSIONSThere is growing conc
- Page 68 and 69: urban resilience. This inevitably c
- Page 70 and 71: In many respects these contrasting
- Page 72 and 73: Many interviewees of both standpoin
- Page 74 and 75: a given area. The rationale for thi
- Page 76 and 77: mapping the location of sources of
- Page 78 and 79: Australian food policy debates refl
- Page 80 and 81: APPENDIX 1: URBAN FOOD SECURITY, UR
- Page 82 and 83: IntroductionGlobally, and in Austra
- Page 84 and 85: Review methodsThis stage of the res
- Page 86 and 87: despite many of the causes of food
- Page 88 and 89: …by 2050… food production will
- Page 90 and 91: 2. How is food security (in general
- Page 92 and 93: the food security of cities, but no
- Page 94 and 95: While some see the density of devel
- Page 96 and 97: when suppliers, distributors, and c
- Page 98 and 99: a more prominent role in enhancing
- Page 100 and 101: community gardens webpage on the Co
- Page 102 and 103: comprehensive description of the ca
- Page 104 and 105: In both the developed and developin
- Page 106 and 107: Their review notes a significant in
- Page 108 and 109: lines of supply from often rural pl
- Page 110 and 111: 1 IntroductionCities have always be
- Page 114 and 115: the Gold Coast remains a city that
- Page 116 and 117: ackyard/community gardenernot affil
- Page 118 and 119: level in local government. VicHealt
- Page 120: Figure 2: Impacts on Municipal Food
- Page 125 and 126: security I recognise that the cost
- Page 127 and 128: United States, he offered the follo
- Page 129 and 130: This vision highlights the multi-fu
- Page 131 and 132: An environmental education centre.
- Page 133 and 134: Melbourne Food ForestA Melbourne ga
- Page 135 and 136: stakeholder consultations, the repo
- Page 137 and 138: can. We sense the changes. The earl
- Page 139 and 140: half-desert environments. We’re g
- Page 141 and 142: etain its basic function and struct
- Page 143 and 144: government; and that trying to get
- Page 145 and 146: the north and the west, where it wo
- Page 147 and 148: Why do people buy so much food that
- Page 149 and 150: urban agriculture (however broadly
- Page 151 and 152: enefits and risks. Before we can co
- Page 153 and 154: Another important and tangible role
- Page 155 and 156: coast without any problems whatsoev
- Page 157 and 158: BIBLIOGRAPHYAECOM (2011) Scoping St
- Page 159 and 160: Burns, C. I., A. (2007). Measuring
- Page 161 and 162: Edwards, F., & Mercer, D. (2010). M
- Page 163 and 164:
James, S. O’Neill, P. and Dimeski
- Page 165 and 166:
Millar, R., 2012, ‘Government shi
- Page 167 and 168:
Saltmarsh, N. M., J; Longhurst, N.
- Page 169 and 170:
Walker B., 2008, Resilience Thinkin