11.07.2015 Views

Urban food security, urban resilience and climate change - weADAPT

Urban food security, urban resilience and climate change - weADAPT

Urban food security, urban resilience and climate change - weADAPT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

despite many of the causes of <strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong> deriving from global level issues. Whilstthis local approach might be considered a ‘b<strong>and</strong>-aid’ solution to global <strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong>, itdoes have the potential to bring more immediate relief to those who do not have secure<strong>and</strong> consistent access to healthy <strong>food</strong>. Indeed, there is mounting evidence showingthat despite Australia’s status as a wealthy nation, with rising costs of living, <strong>food</strong> tendsto be the only flexible element in many household budgets. A survey by the VictorianGovernment’s health department reported:Large numbers of Australians are affected by ‘<strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong>’, which means theyexperience irregular access to safe, nutritionally adequate, culturally acceptable<strong>food</strong> from non-emergency sources. In 2008 about 1 in 20 people surveyed in theVictorian Population Health Survey had run out of <strong>food</strong> at least once in the last 12months <strong>and</strong> had been unable to afford to purchase additional <strong>food</strong>. People on lowincomes, single parents, indigenous communities, people with chronic illnessesor disabilities, refugees <strong>and</strong> people living in remote or isolated areas areespecially vulnerable (Vic Health, 2011:9).In Australia, obesity has also become a major health issue, <strong>and</strong> one that has beenlinked to <strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong>:In the longer term, <strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong> can lead to becoming overweight or obese,particularly in women. While it seems paradoxical that <strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong> is linked tounhealthy weight, these heath issues arise because <strong>food</strong>s of poorer quality withhigh fat, salt <strong>and</strong>/or sugar content are the lowest cost options, whereas dietsbased on lean meats, whole grains <strong>and</strong> fresh vegetables <strong>and</strong> fruits are morecostly (Browne, Laurance <strong>and</strong> Thorpe, 2009).Certainly, problems of <strong>food</strong> are manifest at the local level, <strong>and</strong> as the research findingsnoted above demonstrate, there are often gendered dimensions to such problems.However, the responses to <strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong> developed at <strong>and</strong> for this local scale oftenfavour more individualised, <strong>and</strong> often gender insensitive interventions such aseducation about nutrition. Whilst having an important role in promotion of better diets<strong>and</strong> nutrition awareness, these responses can overlook the macro-level <strong>and</strong> structuralcauses of the problem of <strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong>.Macro-level causes of <strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong>Moving from the local to the global scale, many complex issues converge in what hasbeen referred to as a ‘prefect storm’, rendering global <strong>food</strong> supply chains moreinsecure. Some have observed the irony of a global <strong>food</strong> crisis when record levels ofhunger in 2008 also coincided with record harvests <strong>and</strong> profits of major agri<strong>food</strong>corporations (Holt-Gimenez, Patel <strong>and</strong> Shattuck, 2009). From a critical politicaleconomy perspective, <strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong> is a symptom of broader social inequalities,poverty, l<strong>and</strong> dispossession <strong>and</strong> corporate control of the <strong>food</strong> supply chain (Holt-Giminez, Patel <strong>and</strong> Shattuck, 2009). In addition, this broader, ‘<strong>food</strong> systems’ approachacknowledges the systemic issues affecting the <strong>food</strong> supply chain. These include<strong>urban</strong> encroachment into prime agriculture l<strong>and</strong>s (Condon et al., 2010), environmentaldegradation <strong>and</strong> population growth as systemic problems that will affect more than thepoor <strong>and</strong> vulnerable groups (Lawrence, Richards <strong>and</strong> Lyons, 2012). Further, theenrolment of <strong>food</strong> producing l<strong>and</strong> into the bio-fuel economy (McMichael, 2009), <strong>and</strong>excessive financial speculation in l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> other agricultural commodities has alsopushed up the cost of <strong>food</strong> (Lawrence, Richards <strong>and</strong> Lyons, 2012).Despite evidence that there is currently enough <strong>food</strong> for all to be <strong>food</strong> secure, almost abillion people globally are considered <strong>food</strong> insecure, <strong>and</strong> over one billion people areobese (Patel, 2008). These figures point to the rift in the distribution of <strong>food</strong>, something<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!