IntroductionGlobally, <strong>and</strong> in Australia, cities are growing. Demonstrating this, built-up areas in theworld cover an estimated 4.75 million km 2 , <strong>and</strong> the spread of <strong>urban</strong> areas is growing ata rate of approximately 2040,000 km 2 each year. In Australia, three quarters of thepopulation live in major cities (defined by the Commonwealth Government’s MajorCities Unit as settlements of at least 100,000 people). According to Davis (2005), thisrapid <strong>urban</strong> growth signifies a new epoch for the planet; for the first time in history,more people live in cities than rural areas. This poses significant challenges <strong>and</strong>opportunities for ensuring national <strong>and</strong> international <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>and</strong> suchcircumstances are exacerbated in the context of <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>.According to renowned <strong>food</strong> writer Julian Cribb <strong>urban</strong> expansion is occurring almostentirely on the world’s best farml<strong>and</strong>. However, he also notes that it is not only citiesthat consume farml<strong>and</strong>, but the ‘pleasant but nutritionally unproductive’ recreationalpursuits such as golf courses <strong>and</strong> theme parks enjoyed by city dwellers in peri-<strong>urban</strong>areas (Cribb, 2008, p. 58). Australia’s <strong>urban</strong>ization is also associated with growingdependence on centralized or integrated infrastructure to deliver power, water <strong>and</strong>waste management services <strong>and</strong> on increasingly complex distribution networks,although there is increasing recognition of the merits of decentralised systems (e.g.Cook et al., 2009).While cities grow <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong> their footprint, they are also inextricably linked to <strong>climate</strong><strong>change</strong>, both as the generators of significant proportions of greenhouse gas emissions<strong>and</strong> as places substantially impacted by current <strong>and</strong> future <strong>change</strong>s to <strong>climate</strong>s. Thecapacity of cities to secure the range of resources, including <strong>food</strong>, necessary for theircontinued existence in the face of significant <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> remains the subject ofextensive research <strong>and</strong> policy debate (e.g. Australian Government, 2010).In this review, we critically examine the intersections between Australia’s growing<strong>urban</strong>isation, the need to respond to <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> <strong>and</strong> the prospects of <strong>and</strong>challenges for ensuring greater <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>.Historically, towns <strong>and</strong> cities have been places that have offered greater <strong>security</strong>(including <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>) <strong>and</strong> opportunity than other places, which have typically beenmuch smaller settlements in rural areas. Security <strong>and</strong> opportunity are products,primarily, of scale <strong>and</strong> density. Larger numbers of people, living closer together found iteasier to defend themselves against external threats <strong>and</strong> also to provide each otherwith individual <strong>and</strong> social services. Recent work by Glaeser (2011) <strong>and</strong> Saunders(2010) <strong>and</strong> others has highlighted the contemporary benefits of cities <strong>and</strong> <strong>urban</strong> life,especially to migrants from rural areas. <strong>Urban</strong> scale <strong>and</strong> density also, perhapsparadoxically, provide opportunities for processes of radical social <strong>and</strong> political <strong>change</strong>as well as for <strong>security</strong> <strong>and</strong> continuity. It is no coincidence that the various uprisings ofthe so-called Arab Spring have occurred in the cities of Egypt, Libya, Syria <strong>and</strong> Tunisia.But cities also, <strong>and</strong> at the same time, create threats to individual <strong>and</strong> social <strong>security</strong>:diseases can spread more rapidly in densely populated areas; natural <strong>and</strong> humanmadedisasters can have more devastating effects in such areas, <strong>and</strong> <strong>urban</strong>populations become more dependent on broad scale systems of production,distribution <strong>and</strong> consumption. Rural populations are not necessarily any less vulnerableoverall to disease <strong>and</strong> disaster than <strong>urban</strong> populations, but the nature <strong>and</strong> scale of theirvulnerability is often profoundly different.<strong>Urban</strong> populations derive their relative <strong>security</strong> <strong>and</strong> opportunity from more extensive<strong>and</strong> complex social <strong>and</strong> <strong>urban</strong> systems, but at the same time these can be sources ofvulnerability. Food <strong>security</strong> is a case in point. The relationship between <strong>food</strong> production<strong>and</strong> <strong>urban</strong>isation is both profound <strong>and</strong> long st<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> as Mumford (1961) observed,the foundations of <strong>urban</strong>ism lie in Neolithic period when the domestication of plants <strong>and</strong><strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 73
animals allowed previously nomadic peoples to ‘put down roots’ <strong>and</strong> build settlements(Bartling, 2012). In ideal typical terms, we might contrast <strong>urban</strong> <strong>and</strong> rural systems: inrural areas (or perhaps rural systems in developing countries) <strong>food</strong> production is drivenprimarily by self-sufficiency, with systems of ex<strong>change</strong> <strong>and</strong> distribution developing onlywhen the basic needs of the household have been met <strong>and</strong> surpluses exist. In <strong>urban</strong>areas (especially in developed countries) <strong>food</strong> production is often a commercialoperation with most people consuming <strong>food</strong> produced mostly by others. Furthermore,significant amounts of <strong>food</strong> production takes place outside or beyond the <strong>urban</strong> areas,<strong>and</strong> indeed a significant proportion of <strong>food</strong> consumed by <strong>urban</strong> residents is now grownat great distance from where it is processed <strong>and</strong> consumed.However, the production of <strong>food</strong> within cities also has a long history, <strong>and</strong> there aresigns that it is growing in significance. Yet to date there has been little research,especially in the Australian context, into the extent of domestic <strong>and</strong> <strong>urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> basedproduction (see for example Larder, Lyons <strong>and</strong> Woolcock, forthcoming). Its significancelies not just in its contribution to the supply of nutrition, but also in its wider socialimpacts: enabling <strong>food</strong> growers to re-connect with ‘nature’, re-establishing seasonalsensibilities <strong>and</strong> connections between <strong>food</strong> <strong>and</strong> place, <strong>and</strong> providing new opportunitiesfor social interaction <strong>and</strong> community development. Some argue it also allows new (or infact older but often forgotten) forms of social enterprise to be showcased <strong>and</strong> practised.The growing significance of <strong>food</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> can be seen in a number ofcontemporary policy developments, including the Senate Enquiry into Food Security in2010, the PMSEIC report on Australia <strong>and</strong> Food Security in a Changing World (2010)<strong>and</strong> the National Food Plan, currently being prepared by the Australian Department ofAgriculture, Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Forestry. Each of these developments signifies the politicalimportance of the agricultural sector in the national accounts, a growing emphasis onnew forms of <strong>food</strong> production, processing <strong>and</strong> supply in state plans <strong>and</strong> the emergenceof <strong>urban</strong> agriculture as a matter of local policy concern. Furthermore, global threatssuch as peak oil, <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> <strong>and</strong> economic <strong>and</strong> financial crises also have clearconnections with <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> at both the global <strong>and</strong> the local scales.In mid-2011 the National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility (NCCARF)issued a call under its Synthesis <strong>and</strong> Integrative Research Program for proposals in amodular project looking at ensuring secure <strong>food</strong> supplies for Australia under <strong>climate</strong><strong>change</strong>. This call focussed mainly on <strong>food</strong> supplied by large scale agriculturalproduction in rural areas <strong>and</strong> its international trade, but it did invite proposals onalternative projects consistent with this theme.A team of researchers from Griffith University, the University of Queensl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong>Macquarie University submitted an alternative proposal which focussed on <strong>urban</strong> <strong>food</strong><strong>security</strong> <strong>and</strong> the role of <strong>urban</strong> agriculture in the face of <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>. Following someminor amendments, this was approved <strong>and</strong> this review constitutes an initial output ofthe project.The project takes the form primarily of a critical review of published material related tothe topic, but this will be supplemented by data collected in face-to-face interviews <strong>and</strong>group discussions in two locations, the city of the Gold Coast in Queensl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> partsof Melbourne, Victoria. This review is structured around seven key questions related to<strong>urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>. It will be supplemented bysubsequent reports of the fieldwork undertaken in Melbourne <strong>and</strong> the Gold Coast <strong>and</strong>by a synthesis report to be published by NCCARF later in 2012.<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 74
- Page 1 and 2:
Synthesis and Integrative ResearchF
- Page 3 and 4:
Published by the National Climate C
- Page 5 and 6:
ABSTRACTFood security is increasing
- Page 7 and 8:
1. a review of the literature: on n
- Page 9 and 10:
its Food for All project. This help
- Page 13 and 14:
In response to the existential thre
- Page 15 and 16:
2. OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCHFood i
- Page 17 and 18:
debates and to the more systematic
- Page 19 and 20:
organisation in the past few years.
- Page 21 and 22:
4. RESULTSIn this section we presen
- Page 23 and 24:
increasing productivity. Thus, whil
- Page 25 and 26:
people and the origins of their foo
- Page 27 and 28:
urban food supply chains. Thus, whi
- Page 29 and 30:
This logistics system is dominated
- Page 31 and 32: Like Hodgson et al., as per definit
- Page 33 and 34: esilient, powerful by being locally
- Page 35 and 36: volume or even its contribution to
- Page 37: community food growing can have on
- Page 40 and 41: generations this history has been f
- Page 42 and 43: a stronger focus on addressing the
- Page 44 and 45: The third key aspect is fairness -
- Page 46 and 47: climate (which we live and work in
- Page 48 and 49: agriculture. Eight percent is in ur
- Page 50 and 51: This concept of the ‘spaces in be
- Page 52 and 53: esearch scientist and chair of the
- Page 54 and 55: As discussed above, protection of t
- Page 56: 4.2.5 What is the extent and the im
- Page 60 and 61: no place under the panoply of pract
- Page 62 and 63: increased, the market dominance of
- Page 64 and 65: … the residents of S Park called
- Page 66 and 67: 5. CONCLUSIONSThere is growing conc
- Page 68 and 69: urban resilience. This inevitably c
- Page 70 and 71: In many respects these contrasting
- Page 72 and 73: Many interviewees of both standpoin
- Page 74 and 75: a given area. The rationale for thi
- Page 76 and 77: mapping the location of sources of
- Page 78 and 79: Australian food policy debates refl
- Page 80 and 81: APPENDIX 1: URBAN FOOD SECURITY, UR
- Page 84 and 85: Review methodsThis stage of the res
- Page 86 and 87: despite many of the causes of food
- Page 88 and 89: …by 2050… food production will
- Page 90 and 91: 2. How is food security (in general
- Page 92 and 93: the food security of cities, but no
- Page 94 and 95: While some see the density of devel
- Page 96 and 97: when suppliers, distributors, and c
- Page 98 and 99: a more prominent role in enhancing
- Page 100 and 101: community gardens webpage on the Co
- Page 102 and 103: comprehensive description of the ca
- Page 104 and 105: In both the developed and developin
- Page 106 and 107: Their review notes a significant in
- Page 108 and 109: lines of supply from often rural pl
- Page 110 and 111: 1 IntroductionCities have always be
- Page 112 and 113: Despite some attempts to curb urban
- Page 114 and 115: the Gold Coast remains a city that
- Page 116 and 117: ackyard/community gardenernot affil
- Page 118 and 119: level in local government. VicHealt
- Page 120: Figure 2: Impacts on Municipal Food
- Page 125 and 126: security I recognise that the cost
- Page 127 and 128: United States, he offered the follo
- Page 129 and 130: This vision highlights the multi-fu
- Page 131 and 132: An environmental education centre.
- Page 133 and 134:
Melbourne Food ForestA Melbourne ga
- Page 135 and 136:
stakeholder consultations, the repo
- Page 137 and 138:
can. We sense the changes. The earl
- Page 139 and 140:
half-desert environments. We’re g
- Page 141 and 142:
etain its basic function and struct
- Page 143 and 144:
government; and that trying to get
- Page 145 and 146:
the north and the west, where it wo
- Page 147 and 148:
Why do people buy so much food that
- Page 149 and 150:
urban agriculture (however broadly
- Page 151 and 152:
enefits and risks. Before we can co
- Page 153 and 154:
Another important and tangible role
- Page 155 and 156:
coast without any problems whatsoev
- Page 157 and 158:
BIBLIOGRAPHYAECOM (2011) Scoping St
- Page 159 and 160:
Burns, C. I., A. (2007). Measuring
- Page 161 and 162:
Edwards, F., & Mercer, D. (2010). M
- Page 163 and 164:
James, S. O’Neill, P. and Dimeski
- Page 165 and 166:
Millar, R., 2012, ‘Government shi
- Page 167 and 168:
Saltmarsh, N. M., J; Longhurst, N.
- Page 169 and 170:
Walker B., 2008, Resilience Thinkin