11.07.2015 Views

Urban food security, urban resilience and climate change - weADAPT

Urban food security, urban resilience and climate change - weADAPT

Urban food security, urban resilience and climate change - weADAPT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. RESULTSIn this section we present the main results of the study, drawing on the two mainsources of data: the systematic review of the literature <strong>and</strong> field research in the twocase study areas of Melbourne <strong>and</strong> the Gold Coast.4.1 Results from literature reviewThe literature review was organised around seven key questions <strong>and</strong> these are used tostructure the findings in this section.4.1.1 What do we mean by <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>?Australia is a major <strong>food</strong>-producing nation, with vast areas of l<strong>and</strong> on which to producebulk commodities such as, beef, grain, wool, <strong>and</strong> sheep meat for export. One of thereasons for the colonisation of Australia by the British was to exploit its naturalresources <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> production began soon after the arrival of the First Fleet in the1780s to feed prisoners deported to Australia – with the aim of reducing the burden onBritain of feeding them (Lawrence, Richards <strong>and</strong> Burch, 2012). Forty years later, <strong>food</strong>from Australia began to be exported abroad, which led later to the popular conceptionof Australia being a ‘l<strong>and</strong> of plenty’ with an economy that was ‘riding on a sheep’s back’– highlighting the dependency of the economy on agricultural exports, particularly wool.Following the second World War, as the <strong>food</strong> crisis in Europe deepened, there was arenewed effort in Australia to produce more <strong>food</strong> for export. Known as the ‘Food forBritain’ scheme, vast areas of l<strong>and</strong> were cleared <strong>and</strong> technological innovations <strong>and</strong>new inputs were introduced to boost production <strong>and</strong> industrialise Australian farming toproduce more goods for export. Today, around 60% of Australia’s total production of<strong>food</strong> is destined for overseas markets, representing 76% of the gross value of farmproduction (Lawrence, Richards <strong>and</strong> Lyons, 2012). While Australia does not subsidisedirectly its agricultural production, opting instead for an ostensibly free marketapproach, there are a number of regulatory mechanisms <strong>and</strong> policy measures, whichmodify market conditions. Nevertheless, government support for agriculture in Australiais among the lowest of OECD member states <strong>and</strong> focuses on product promotion <strong>and</strong><strong>food</strong> safety <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards.These historical origins of an export-led agricultural system in Australia, based uponon-going technological innovations <strong>and</strong> the adoption of European farming practices,helps set the scene for contemporary debates related to <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, includingdebates related to growing <strong>food</strong> for export versus domestic markets, the role of science<strong>and</strong> technology, regulation <strong>and</strong> corporate concentration. Many of these themes arelinked also to broader debates about Australia’s <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, including foreigninvestment in <strong>and</strong> ownership of farms <strong>and</strong> cattle stations.There is broad consensus that one of the major issues confronting society now <strong>and</strong> intothe future is <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> – a term now widely used in policy circles (see for exampleLawrence, Lyons & Wallington, 2010). Concepts of <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> emerged in the 1970s,<strong>and</strong> at that time focussed mainly on the capacity of regions or nations to meet theaggregate requirements of their people for <strong>food</strong>. This scale of focus tends to ignoresubstantial <strong>and</strong> significant variation at more local scales <strong>and</strong> consequently an<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!