11.07.2015 Views

Urban food security, urban resilience and climate change - weADAPT

Urban food security, urban resilience and climate change - weADAPT

Urban food security, urban resilience and climate change - weADAPT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

driven agro-ecology (rather than corporate-driven agribusiness) as the mostappropriate mode of production to secure the right to <strong>food</strong> for vulnerable groups,especially in developing countries (United Nations, 2010). In addition, agro-ecologywas also identified by De Schutter as a mode of production that accrues benefits inrelation to increased productivity at the field level, the reduction of rural poverty,improved nutrition, <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> adaption <strong>and</strong> the better dissemination of agricultural‘best practices’.Food <strong>security</strong> in <strong>urban</strong> settingsAs mentioned in the introduction, more than half of the world’s population now lives incities. This <strong>urban</strong> population has, arguably, not only become increasingly disconnectedfrom the origins of <strong>food</strong>, but is also reliant on an increasingly globalised economy ofmonetary ex<strong>change</strong> to access <strong>food</strong>. Vulnerabilities are exacerbated when economicresources are low, <strong>and</strong> when <strong>food</strong> grown outside of the city is compromised due toclimatic variability <strong>and</strong> extreme weather events. Feeding growing city populationsrequires transporting <strong>food</strong> from outside of its perimeters, sometimes from agriculturalregions outside of the city, but increasingly from distant l<strong>and</strong>s beyond the referentialframe of the recipient. Dixon (2011) refers to this disconnection between people <strong>and</strong>the origins of their <strong>food</strong> as a metabolic rift, a disconnection <strong>and</strong> vulnerability that wasalso highlighted during this project’s fieldwork in Melbourne <strong>and</strong> the Gold Coast.<strong>Urban</strong> agriculture can also be seen as part of a <strong>food</strong> sovereignty movement, wherepeople take control of some of their calorific needs by producing <strong>food</strong> in their backyards<strong>and</strong> community gardens <strong>and</strong> develop informal <strong>food</strong> distribution systems such as <strong>food</strong>swaps, or gleaning. In this respect they are not only reacting to concerns about theavailability of <strong>food</strong>, but also to its inputs. There is evidence that <strong>urban</strong> citizens areincreasingly concerned about the health <strong>and</strong> environmental implications of an industrial<strong>food</strong> system, its reliance on chemical inputs <strong>and</strong> the recent push toward GM <strong>food</strong>.In response to growing awareness of <strong>food</strong> vulnerability many <strong>urban</strong> citizens havebegun develop new approaches to local <strong>food</strong> production <strong>and</strong> distribution, exploringinnovative methods of <strong>urban</strong> agriculture <strong>and</strong> re-applying methods <strong>and</strong> practices thatwere once commonplace in cities. In some local jurisdictions this has been augmentedby local <strong>and</strong> regional state support which has resulted in new partnerships with localcommunity groups. In towns <strong>and</strong> cities appropriate planning policies can help re-insert<strong>food</strong> growing into city life by extending the opportunities for groups in civil society toengage in <strong>food</strong> growing (Burke, 2009).There is great potential for <strong>urban</strong> agriculture to play a bigger part in dealing with <strong>food</strong>in<strong>security</strong>. Kortright <strong>and</strong> Wakefield (2011) report that globally, around 600 millionpeople are engaged informally in <strong>urban</strong> agriculture. With Havana seen as a model for<strong>urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> production with an estimated 90% of the fresh fruit <strong>and</strong> vegetablesconsumed in the city being grown in <strong>and</strong> around the city <strong>and</strong> despite differences in thesocial, political <strong>and</strong> economic context, this Cuban experience offers valuable lessonsfor <strong>urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> production in Australian cities<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!