through two well-known mechanisms. The authors argue that this is important becausethe lack of nitrogen in plants will lead to a reduction of the protein content <strong>and</strong> thereforethe nutritional quality of <strong>food</strong>. Devereux <strong>and</strong> Edwards (2004) argue that most <strong>climate</strong>models predict catastrophic consequences for <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> in regions, while oftenignoring the potential impacts of improved technology <strong>and</strong> adaptive behaviour. Theynote that this emphasis on models of agricultural consequences is often at the expenseof a more systematic consideration of political responses. Vermeulen et al., (2010)concentrate on some of the ways that agricultural risks associated with increasing<strong>climate</strong> variability <strong>and</strong> extreme events might be better managed. For example improved<strong>climate</strong> information services <strong>and</strong> accelerated adaptation to progressive <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>over decadal time scales through integrated packages of technology, agronomy <strong>and</strong>policy options for farmers <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> systems all have the potential to mitigate the effects<strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>. This literature provides fresh insights into how <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> willaffect <strong>food</strong> production <strong>and</strong> supply but also suggests other mechanisms for adaptation.Australian agriculture is highly dependent on the <strong>climate</strong> <strong>and</strong> its variability <strong>and</strong> isindeed ‘a l<strong>and</strong> of droughts <strong>and</strong> flooding rains’. Climate affects almost every aspect of<strong>food</strong> production from the plants <strong>and</strong> animals used, average production <strong>and</strong> productionvariability, product quality, which areas are farmed, what soil types are preferred, themanagement systems <strong>and</strong> technologies used, input costs, product prices <strong>and</strong> naturalresource management. It follows that if the <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>s, many aspects of <strong>food</strong>production will <strong>change</strong> too (PMSEIC, 2010:12) <strong>and</strong> these anticipated impacts are likelyto be, on balance, negative rather than positive although there may be newopportunities in a <strong>change</strong>d environment.In their review of the connections between <strong>food</strong> systems, <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> <strong>and</strong> health,Edwards et al., (2010) conclude that <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> will affect <strong>food</strong> systems <strong>and</strong> healthby impacting (usually negatively) the quantity, quality <strong>and</strong> affordability of <strong>food</strong>, bearingin mind that Australia… has one of the most concentrated <strong>food</strong> supplies of any country, beingdominated by two large supermarket chains...[in which] the <strong>food</strong> logistics systemis built around the principle of just-in-time movement of freight reducinginefficiency under normal circumstances but which leaves no margins in theevent of a disaster. (p. 20)Using a <strong>food</strong> systems approach (i.e. one which recognises the existence <strong>and</strong>interconnectedness of a range of elements: growing, harvesting, processing,packaging, transporting, marketing, consumption <strong>and</strong> disposal) they note that although‘most Australians have available (albeit not equally accessible) a relatively abundant,diverse, cheap <strong>and</strong> safe <strong>food</strong> supply...diet-related behaviours contribute significantly tothe burden of disease.’ (p. 3). In other words, while we are less exposed to thediseases of malnutrition, we are more exposed to those associated with the overconsumptionof processed <strong>food</strong>s at the expense of fresh fruit <strong>and</strong> vegetables.However, although the Australian <strong>food</strong> system can produce more than enough fordomestic consumption <strong>and</strong> indeed can play an important role in supplying other partsof the world, its internal supply lines are vulnerable to disruption by extreme weatherevents which are likely to get worse as the <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>s.<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 19
This logistics system is dominated by road transport, with almost 95% of all <strong>food</strong> forhuman <strong>and</strong> animal consumption (by total volume) using this mode <strong>and</strong> accounting for22% of the total tonne-kilometres travelled as Australian road freight. Clearly, anydisruption to this network of roads is likely to have a significant negative impact on themovement of <strong>food</strong> around the country <strong>and</strong> ultimately on its cost.Thus, while the long term impacts of <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> on Australian agriculture <strong>and</strong> itscapacity to provide <strong>food</strong> for both domestic consumption <strong>and</strong> international export areprofound, in the shorter term the impact is more likely to be seen in disruptions tosupply lines as roads are damaged as well as to more localised crop failures dueextreme weather events. Edwards et al., notes also that the distribution of fertilisers<strong>and</strong> petroleum products on which Australian agriculture has become increasinglydependent are also exposed to these potential disruptions to the national <strong>and</strong> regionalroad network.In their consideration of possible responses by components of Australian <strong>food</strong> systemsto a changing <strong>climate</strong>, Edwards et al., identify <strong>change</strong>s in the location of production <strong>and</strong>processing sites; <strong>change</strong>s in shopping behaviour (including even more consumption ofunhealthy processed <strong>food</strong>s which cost less than healthier fresh <strong>food</strong>s); <strong>and</strong> communityresponses in <strong>urban</strong> areas such as new forms of production <strong>and</strong> distribution. Here thequestion of scale <strong>and</strong> significance is important <strong>and</strong> they note:Although seemingly meagre set against the sheer scale of the formal economy,these pockets of <strong>change</strong> reveal patterns of community underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong>concern, ideas <strong>and</strong> innovation that have the potential to grow. (p. 24)Furthermore, <strong>and</strong> as part of broader programs to build <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong>, greater <strong>urban</strong><strong>food</strong> growing <strong>and</strong> processing can make a valuable contribution:The <strong>urban</strong> relocation of <strong>food</strong> growing, if well managed, could boost certain fresh<strong>food</strong> supplies while complementing rural crops, in addition to encouraging new<strong>urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> related services, introducing <strong>urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> models <strong>and</strong> <strong>change</strong> in rolesfrom consumer to producer for citizens. <strong>Urban</strong> agriculture could also reducevulnerability to <strong>food</strong> supply disruptions or extended emergency supply situationsby providing diverse sources of perishable <strong>food</strong> supply. (p. 24)We return to these issues later when considering in more detail the role of <strong>urban</strong>agriculture.Overall, there is a tendency in some of the literature to rely on general models of thelikely impacts of <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> on <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> <strong>and</strong> also on the <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> of cities,but not to describe more detailed studies of local impacts in specific places. We can,nevertheless, expect these general models not only to improve over time but perhapsmore importantly to allow the generation of more localised models of impact throughprocesses of downscaling. However, it is likely that without a concerted effort to drawalso on a variety of local studies, the field will continue to be characterised by anunhelpful degree of ignorance <strong>and</strong> fragmentation. While it is unlikely that any oneparadigm of research design will prevail, the challenge of producing coherentsyntheses of methodologically diverse local studies will remain.4.1.3 What do we mean by <strong>urban</strong> agriculture?<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 20
- Page 1 and 2: Synthesis and Integrative ResearchF
- Page 3 and 4: Published by the National Climate C
- Page 5 and 6: ABSTRACTFood security is increasing
- Page 7 and 8: 1. a review of the literature: on n
- Page 9 and 10: its Food for All project. This help
- Page 13 and 14: In response to the existential thre
- Page 15 and 16: 2. OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCHFood i
- Page 17 and 18: debates and to the more systematic
- Page 19 and 20: organisation in the past few years.
- Page 21 and 22: 4. RESULTSIn this section we presen
- Page 23 and 24: increasing productivity. Thus, whil
- Page 25 and 26: people and the origins of their foo
- Page 27: urban food supply chains. Thus, whi
- Page 31 and 32: Like Hodgson et al., as per definit
- Page 33 and 34: esilient, powerful by being locally
- Page 35 and 36: volume or even its contribution to
- Page 37: community food growing can have on
- Page 40 and 41: generations this history has been f
- Page 42 and 43: a stronger focus on addressing the
- Page 44 and 45: The third key aspect is fairness -
- Page 46 and 47: climate (which we live and work in
- Page 48 and 49: agriculture. Eight percent is in ur
- Page 50 and 51: This concept of the ‘spaces in be
- Page 52 and 53: esearch scientist and chair of the
- Page 54 and 55: As discussed above, protection of t
- Page 56: 4.2.5 What is the extent and the im
- Page 60 and 61: no place under the panoply of pract
- Page 62 and 63: increased, the market dominance of
- Page 64 and 65: … the residents of S Park called
- Page 66 and 67: 5. CONCLUSIONSThere is growing conc
- Page 68 and 69: urban resilience. This inevitably c
- Page 70 and 71: In many respects these contrasting
- Page 72 and 73: Many interviewees of both standpoin
- Page 74 and 75: a given area. The rationale for thi
- Page 76 and 77: mapping the location of sources of
- Page 78 and 79:
Australian food policy debates refl
- Page 80 and 81:
APPENDIX 1: URBAN FOOD SECURITY, UR
- Page 82 and 83:
IntroductionGlobally, and in Austra
- Page 84 and 85:
Review methodsThis stage of the res
- Page 86 and 87:
despite many of the causes of food
- Page 88 and 89:
…by 2050… food production will
- Page 90 and 91:
2. How is food security (in general
- Page 92 and 93:
the food security of cities, but no
- Page 94 and 95:
While some see the density of devel
- Page 96 and 97:
when suppliers, distributors, and c
- Page 98 and 99:
a more prominent role in enhancing
- Page 100 and 101:
community gardens webpage on the Co
- Page 102 and 103:
comprehensive description of the ca
- Page 104 and 105:
In both the developed and developin
- Page 106 and 107:
Their review notes a significant in
- Page 108 and 109:
lines of supply from often rural pl
- Page 110 and 111:
1 IntroductionCities have always be
- Page 112 and 113:
Despite some attempts to curb urban
- Page 114 and 115:
the Gold Coast remains a city that
- Page 116 and 117:
ackyard/community gardenernot affil
- Page 118 and 119:
level in local government. VicHealt
- Page 120:
Figure 2: Impacts on Municipal Food
- Page 125 and 126:
security I recognise that the cost
- Page 127 and 128:
United States, he offered the follo
- Page 129 and 130:
This vision highlights the multi-fu
- Page 131 and 132:
An environmental education centre.
- Page 133 and 134:
Melbourne Food ForestA Melbourne ga
- Page 135 and 136:
stakeholder consultations, the repo
- Page 137 and 138:
can. We sense the changes. The earl
- Page 139 and 140:
half-desert environments. We’re g
- Page 141 and 142:
etain its basic function and struct
- Page 143 and 144:
government; and that trying to get
- Page 145 and 146:
the north and the west, where it wo
- Page 147 and 148:
Why do people buy so much food that
- Page 149 and 150:
urban agriculture (however broadly
- Page 151 and 152:
enefits and risks. Before we can co
- Page 153 and 154:
Another important and tangible role
- Page 155 and 156:
coast without any problems whatsoev
- Page 157 and 158:
BIBLIOGRAPHYAECOM (2011) Scoping St
- Page 159 and 160:
Burns, C. I., A. (2007). Measuring
- Page 161 and 162:
Edwards, F., & Mercer, D. (2010). M
- Page 163 and 164:
James, S. O’Neill, P. and Dimeski
- Page 165 and 166:
Millar, R., 2012, ‘Government shi
- Page 167 and 168:
Saltmarsh, N. M., J; Longhurst, N.
- Page 169 and 170:
Walker B., 2008, Resilience Thinkin