2. How is <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> (in general <strong>and</strong> in cities) likely to be impacted by<strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>?The effects of <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> are likely to exacerbate a range of existing problems with<strong>food</strong> supply. These include the problem of <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> colonisation generallyfor example. Morgan & Sonnino (2010) have coined the phrase ‘the new <strong>food</strong> equation’to describe the constellation of complex new developments that have obligedpoliticians <strong>and</strong> planners to treat <strong>food</strong> policy more seriously. This constellation includesthe <strong>food</strong> price surge of 2007/08 which led to a sharp rise in global <strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong>. Thiscontributed to the current position of <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> as a matter of national <strong>security</strong> <strong>and</strong>may be leading to new forms of ‘<strong>food</strong> colonialism’ (Morgan & Sonnino, 2009:210)whereby cash rich but <strong>food</strong> poor countries systematically buy up the productivecapacity of poorer countries. Rapid <strong>urban</strong>isation in many countries is also raisingconcerns about the <strong>resilience</strong> of <strong>urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> supply chains. While the effects of morevariable rainfall patterns, more very hot days, more severe storms <strong>and</strong> changingpatterns of vector borne diseases are likely to have profound effects on traditionalagricultural practices, they will also affect <strong>urban</strong> agriculture.One of the most significant reviews of <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> in Australia is included in the recentreport from the Prime Minister’s Science, Engineering <strong>and</strong> Innovation Council(PMSEIC, 2010), entitled Australian <strong>and</strong> Food Security in a Changing World. Thisnotes that <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> will have a number of direct impacts on <strong>food</strong> production as aresult of changing patterns of rainfall, more very hot days <strong>and</strong> soil erosion. But here arealso likely to be significant indirect effects such as disruptions to supply lines as a resultof floods, cyclones <strong>and</strong> more very hot days.Australian agriculture is highly dependent on the <strong>climate</strong> <strong>and</strong> its variability:Australia is indeed ‘a l<strong>and</strong> of droughts <strong>and</strong> flooding rains’. Climate affects almostevery aspect of <strong>food</strong> production: the plants <strong>and</strong> animals used, averageproduction <strong>and</strong> production variability, product quality, what areas are farmed,what soil types are preferred, the management systems <strong>and</strong> technologies used,input costs, product prices <strong>and</strong> natural resource management. It, therefore,follows that if the <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>s, many aspects of <strong>food</strong> production will <strong>change</strong>too (PMSEIC, 2010:12).And these anticipated impacts are likely to be, on balance, negative rather than positivealthough there may be new opportunities in a <strong>change</strong>d environment... .the predicted environmental <strong>change</strong>s associated with <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> areexpected to have an overall negative effect on agricultural production with seriouscrop declines in some countries (PMSEIC, 2010:21).These negative impacts are varied:Climate <strong>change</strong> will considerably alter the productivity of arable l<strong>and</strong>. As rainfallretreats to the coast <strong>and</strong> inl<strong>and</strong> temperatures rise, the effective rainfall incurrently productive areas will be lowered quickly. Areas currently cropped toproduce grain will become increasingly marginal <strong>and</strong> be turned over to extensivegrazing. Such areas are often characterised by low soil nutrients <strong>and</strong> unable tosustain grazing systems without fertiliser input. Although <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> mayincrease the proportion of marginal arable l<strong>and</strong> due to reduced effective rainfall,l<strong>and</strong> degradation processes such as salinity <strong>and</strong> acidification may slow, as theseare driven by profile water movement. The decreased biomass production,however, significantly increases erosion risks associated with reduced vegetativecover, resulting in dust storms <strong>and</strong> silted dams. L<strong>and</strong> use conflicts are likely to<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 81
ecome more acute in the future. Already population <strong>and</strong> development pressuresin coastal peri-<strong>urban</strong> areas have resulted in the loss of arable l<strong>and</strong> to housing<strong>and</strong> industry. The coastal peri-<strong>urban</strong> zone is predicted to become increasinglyvaluable as rainfall patterns retreat to the coast. As coastal cities exp<strong>and</strong> intoproductive <strong>and</strong> arable areas, viable block sizes for potential horticulturalproduction are reduced to high value parcels of l<strong>and</strong> for housing. As developmentproceeds, neighbouring viable <strong>and</strong> productive parcels of l<strong>and</strong> come underincreasing pressure to cease traditional farming methods (p. 29).These conclusions are echoed by de Zeeuw & Dubbeling (2009) in their review ofglobal trends. They suggest that because of their high dependency on <strong>food</strong> boughtrather than <strong>food</strong> grown by themselves, <strong>urban</strong> consumers are likely to becomeincreasingly vulnerable to a number of global threats. And, of course, the <strong>urban</strong> poorwill be most exposed <strong>and</strong> vulnerable to these new threats:Inevitably, the effects of <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> will hit hardest on the <strong>urban</strong> poor, sincethey are often located in the most vulnerable parts of the cities <strong>and</strong> have thelowest capacity to adapt to such <strong>change</strong>s (de Zeeuw & Dubbeling, 2009, p. 5).However, rural populations will not be unaffected:City economies will suffer as agricultural production in the surroundingcountryside is hit by storms, floods or water scarcity. The decline in agriculturalproductivity will thus not only effect the rural population but also the <strong>urban</strong> poor(de Zeeuw & Dubbeling, 2009, p. 10).Gregory et al.(2005) usefully broaden their consideration of <strong>security</strong> from apreoccupation with <strong>food</strong> availability to issues of access <strong>and</strong> utilisation, or what is oftenreferred to as a ‘<strong>food</strong> systems’ approach:Much climatic <strong>change</strong>/agricultural research has been focussed on assessing thesensitivity of various attributes of crop systems l<strong>and</strong> suitability, crop yields, pestregimes) to specified <strong>change</strong>s in <strong>climate</strong>. These partial assessments most oftenconsider <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> in isolation, focus on bio-physical aspects of production,<strong>and</strong> provide little insight into the <strong>food</strong> accessibility <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> utilisation dimensionsof <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>. (Gregory et al., 2005 p. 2143)Instead they propose a concern also with the capacity of other systems to cope withnew threats <strong>and</strong> challenges,<strong>and</strong>:The vulnerability of <strong>food</strong> systems is not determined by the nature <strong>and</strong> magnitudeof environmental stress per se, but by the combination of the societal capacity tocope with, <strong>and</strong>/or recover from environmental <strong>change</strong>, coupled with the degree ofexposure to stress. (Gregory et al., 2005, p. 2143)… <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> is only one of several <strong>change</strong>s affecting <strong>food</strong> systems <strong>and</strong> thatits relative importance varies both between regions <strong>and</strong> between different societalgroups within a region. Adaptations of <strong>food</strong> systems via interventions inavailability, access <strong>and</strong> utilisation are possible to cope with <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> atdifferent scales although their feedbacks to the earth system have yet to be fullyassessed (Gregory et al., 2005, p. 2147)Overall, there is a tendency in some of the literature to make broad statements aboutthe likely impacts of <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> on <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> in general <strong>and</strong> perhaps even on<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 82
- Page 1 and 2:
Synthesis and Integrative ResearchF
- Page 3 and 4:
Published by the National Climate C
- Page 5 and 6:
ABSTRACTFood security is increasing
- Page 7 and 8:
1. a review of the literature: on n
- Page 9 and 10:
its Food for All project. This help
- Page 13 and 14:
In response to the existential thre
- Page 15 and 16:
2. OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCHFood i
- Page 17 and 18:
debates and to the more systematic
- Page 19 and 20:
organisation in the past few years.
- Page 21 and 22:
4. RESULTSIn this section we presen
- Page 23 and 24:
increasing productivity. Thus, whil
- Page 25 and 26:
people and the origins of their foo
- Page 27 and 28:
urban food supply chains. Thus, whi
- Page 29 and 30:
This logistics system is dominated
- Page 31 and 32:
Like Hodgson et al., as per definit
- Page 33 and 34:
esilient, powerful by being locally
- Page 35 and 36:
volume or even its contribution to
- Page 37:
community food growing can have on
- Page 40 and 41: generations this history has been f
- Page 42 and 43: a stronger focus on addressing the
- Page 44 and 45: The third key aspect is fairness -
- Page 46 and 47: climate (which we live and work in
- Page 48 and 49: agriculture. Eight percent is in ur
- Page 50 and 51: This concept of the ‘spaces in be
- Page 52 and 53: esearch scientist and chair of the
- Page 54 and 55: As discussed above, protection of t
- Page 56: 4.2.5 What is the extent and the im
- Page 60 and 61: no place under the panoply of pract
- Page 62 and 63: increased, the market dominance of
- Page 64 and 65: … the residents of S Park called
- Page 66 and 67: 5. CONCLUSIONSThere is growing conc
- Page 68 and 69: urban resilience. This inevitably c
- Page 70 and 71: In many respects these contrasting
- Page 72 and 73: Many interviewees of both standpoin
- Page 74 and 75: a given area. The rationale for thi
- Page 76 and 77: mapping the location of sources of
- Page 78 and 79: Australian food policy debates refl
- Page 80 and 81: APPENDIX 1: URBAN FOOD SECURITY, UR
- Page 82 and 83: IntroductionGlobally, and in Austra
- Page 84 and 85: Review methodsThis stage of the res
- Page 86 and 87: despite many of the causes of food
- Page 88 and 89: …by 2050… food production will
- Page 92 and 93: the food security of cities, but no
- Page 94 and 95: While some see the density of devel
- Page 96 and 97: when suppliers, distributors, and c
- Page 98 and 99: a more prominent role in enhancing
- Page 100 and 101: community gardens webpage on the Co
- Page 102 and 103: comprehensive description of the ca
- Page 104 and 105: In both the developed and developin
- Page 106 and 107: Their review notes a significant in
- Page 108 and 109: lines of supply from often rural pl
- Page 110 and 111: 1 IntroductionCities have always be
- Page 112 and 113: Despite some attempts to curb urban
- Page 114 and 115: the Gold Coast remains a city that
- Page 116 and 117: ackyard/community gardenernot affil
- Page 118 and 119: level in local government. VicHealt
- Page 120: Figure 2: Impacts on Municipal Food
- Page 125 and 126: security I recognise that the cost
- Page 127 and 128: United States, he offered the follo
- Page 129 and 130: This vision highlights the multi-fu
- Page 131 and 132: An environmental education centre.
- Page 133 and 134: Melbourne Food ForestA Melbourne ga
- Page 135 and 136: stakeholder consultations, the repo
- Page 137 and 138: can. We sense the changes. The earl
- Page 139 and 140: half-desert environments. We’re g
- Page 141 and 142:
etain its basic function and struct
- Page 143 and 144:
government; and that trying to get
- Page 145 and 146:
the north and the west, where it wo
- Page 147 and 148:
Why do people buy so much food that
- Page 149 and 150:
urban agriculture (however broadly
- Page 151 and 152:
enefits and risks. Before we can co
- Page 153 and 154:
Another important and tangible role
- Page 155 and 156:
coast without any problems whatsoev
- Page 157 and 158:
BIBLIOGRAPHYAECOM (2011) Scoping St
- Page 159 and 160:
Burns, C. I., A. (2007). Measuring
- Page 161 and 162:
Edwards, F., & Mercer, D. (2010). M
- Page 163 and 164:
James, S. O’Neill, P. and Dimeski
- Page 165 and 166:
Millar, R., 2012, ‘Government shi
- Page 167 and 168:
Saltmarsh, N. M., J; Longhurst, N.
- Page 169 and 170:
Walker B., 2008, Resilience Thinkin