11.07.2015 Views

Urban food security, urban resilience and climate change - weADAPT

Urban food security, urban resilience and climate change - weADAPT

Urban food security, urban resilience and climate change - weADAPT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A community which is informed about the <strong>food</strong> value chain <strong>and</strong> makingappropriate <strong>food</strong> choices will exert a positive influence on <strong>food</strong> innovation.(PMSEIC, 2010: 60)The consequences of Australian <strong>urban</strong>isation are also noted:Australia has become a highly <strong>urban</strong>ised community with connections toagriculture being eroded <strong>and</strong> fewer people having direct connections to farming.From this perspective, this would appear to have resulted in a loss of respect for<strong>food</strong> with resultant waste, declining support for rural communities <strong>and</strong> lowerintakes in agricultural <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> technology training programs. The recentdroughts <strong>and</strong> water restrictions in major cities have, however, reignited rural links<strong>and</strong> presented an opportunity for increasing interest <strong>and</strong> awareness ofagricultural production. (PMSEIC, 2010: 60)The report notes an apparent waning of interest in agriculture <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> production <strong>and</strong>a rural/<strong>urban</strong> divide, but fails to recognise at all any interest in the production of <strong>food</strong>within <strong>urban</strong> areas, either at a small scale for personal use, via community gardens orat the small to medium commercial scale within or on the fringes of cities. It is not clearfrom the report whether this <strong>urban</strong> dimension was ignored from the outset orconsidered <strong>and</strong> then dismissed as insignificant or irrelevant, but it would appear to besomething of a lacuna in its perspective on the future of Australian <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>.In summary, over the last forty years the concept of <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> has informed policydebate at the international, national <strong>and</strong> local levels. The concept has, however,undergone a number of <strong>change</strong>s <strong>and</strong> challenges although as Maxwell (1996:155)noted some time ago, ‘<strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> had become, it seems, a cornucopia of ideas’ witha plethora of definitions. Indeed twenty years ago, Smith et al, (1993) found close totwo hundred different definitions of the term. Nevertheless, it is possible to identifysome broad categories <strong>and</strong> periods in this definitional development: from the global tothe national to the household in focus; from a <strong>food</strong> supply to household <strong>and</strong> individuallivelihood perspective; <strong>and</strong> from objective indicators to subjective perceptions (Maxwell,1996:156). But in all of these <strong>change</strong>s we see little attention being paid to the <strong>urban</strong>dimension of the issue, except in recognising that <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> <strong>and</strong> poverty areconnected <strong>and</strong> that the poor are increasingly found in cities.We return to this gap below when considering in more detail the role <strong>and</strong> potential of<strong>urban</strong> agriculture in building greater <strong>urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>.4.1.2 How is <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> likely to be impacted by <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>?The effects of <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> are likely to exacerbate a range of existing problems with<strong>food</strong> supply, including the problem of <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> colonisation. Morgan &Sonnino (2010) have coined the phrase ‘the new <strong>food</strong> equation’ to describe theconstellation of complex new developments that have obliged politicians <strong>and</strong> plannersto treat <strong>food</strong> policy more seriously. This constellation includes the <strong>food</strong> price surge of2007/08, which led to a sharp rise in global <strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong>. This contributed to thecurrent framing of <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> as a matter of national <strong>security</strong> <strong>and</strong> may be leading tonew forms of ‘<strong>food</strong> colonialism’ (Morgan & Sonnino, 2009:210) whereby cash rich but<strong>food</strong> poor countries systematically buy up the productive capacity of poorer countries.Rapid <strong>urban</strong>isation in many countries is also raising concerns about the <strong>resilience</strong> of<strong>Urban</strong> <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>, <strong>urban</strong> <strong>resilience</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong> 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!